2020年7月14日 星期二

On Tech: How to fight health ‘cures’ online

Junk health information that preys on people's fears spreads online. Here's how we can stamp it out.

How to fight health ‘cures’ online

Erik Carter

Anne Borden King had already battled online health misinformation as a parent of a child with autism. Then, as a patient, she was barraged on Facebook by bogus cancer “cure” advertisements after posting about her diagnosis.

Borden, a co-founder of the Campaign Against Phony Autism Cures, talked to me about what we and Facebook can do to stamp out the worst kinds of junk health information that preys on people’s fears. It requires us to have some uncomfortable conversations, and for Facebook to fundamentally change how it works.

Stories like Borden’s feel distressingly familiar. Internet grifters looking to make money have been responsible for spreading false vaccine conspiracies online or selling illegal drugs. And because our health is a perennial anxiety, there’s a big market for false hope.

“You can’t get rid of the impetus for pseudoscience, but you can stop a lot of vulnerable people from being exploited,” Borden said.

First, let’s discuss what Facebook can do to stop this. “Only take as many ads as they have time for humans for review,” Borden said. “That’s the only ethical thing they can do.”

This one is a doozy. Advertising online tends to be more automated than it is for TV or newspapers. Facebook and Google do have people and computer systems to weed out some inappropriate ads, but many are purchased without much human intervention.

ADVERTISEMENT

Borden is essentially saying that automated advertising is too risky, at least for health-related products. (A Facebook spokeswoman declined to comment.)

Like many proposed fixes for our popular internet hangouts, Borden’s suggestion boils down to making social media more like conventional media. That’s what critics of Facebook or other online companies mean when they say that these companies should add context to politicians’ inflammatory statements posted on their sites, or that they shouldn’t be a forum for all ideas.

Borden is less worried about your friends spreading bogus health information online, and wants Facebook to focus on stamping out financially motivated people behind the ads she saw or what she called “stealth marketing.” Borden said companies set up Facebook groups that promote themselves as online support networks but really serve to push unproven health treatments.

As for what we can do about junk health ads, Borden said that every time you see what looks like a sketchy health advertisement on Facebook, you should report it. That flags the ad for review by Facebook and possible removal.

Borden also had advice for how to talk to people we know about health misinformation.

She said she waited a long time to tell people about her cancer diagnosis because she dreaded friends or acquaintances telling her about “alternative” treatments. We might want to brush off unhelpful advice, but these personal conversations can be a starting point to steer people away from pseudoscience. (These tips on how to talk to loved ones about conspiracy theories might help, too.)

ADVERTISEMENT

Borden said, however, that she saw arguing with strangers online about health misinformation as pointless.

She is heartened that the pandemic has made all of us, government officials and internet companies more aware of the dangers of health misinformation.

“Some of those people that we’ve been complaining about for years are finally being regulated, because of coronavirus,” Borden said.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Digital changed everything. That’s the problem.

There’s a paradox behind many of the digital services we love: The qualities that make them successful and useful can also make them risky or exploitative.

Take those precisely targeted Facebook ads that pitched bogus cancer cures as soon as Borden posted about her diagnosis. They’re a result of Facebook gathering huge amounts of information about us to pinpoint product ads at those of us who might be most receptive to the message.

If you’re a small business and those finely targeted ads help you sell your homemade patterns to sewing hobbyists, the Facebook system is incredibly useful. The dark side is this same setup makes Facebook like candy to modern-day snake-oil salesmen.

And it’s not just Facebook. Uber and Lyft let almost anyone be a self-employed taxi driver. But now some drivers and government officials are asking whether treating drivers as independent contractors rather than employees with the right to receive benefits is fair.

Amazon’s sprawling network of merchants lets it sell almost any product imaginable. That’s incredibly useful, and also extremely dangerous, for shoppers like us.

I don’t know how to resolve this. These companies and other digital powerhouses brought us something different because they ditched the usual conventions about how advertising should work, what a job looks like and the limits of store shelves. It’s wonderful. And also awful.

Before we go …

  • Should you delete TikTok? A Washington Post columnist looked under the hood of the app and found it siphoned no more data from your phone than Facebook did. (This is not a compliment, and he has suggestions to limit the snooping.)This doesn’t solve, however, what some American politicians fear — that because TikTok is owned by a Chinese company, it is beholden to a government that might force it to spy on Americans or censor people to China’s liking. TikTok says it wouldn’t do that.
  • Also in fears of Chinese spying: After pressure from the U.S. government, Britain said it would ban equipment from the Chinese technology giant Huawei from the country’s high-speed wireless network, my colleagues Adam Satariano and Stephen Castle reported. As with TikTok, one big government fear is that Huawei’s home country might order the company to use its equipment for espionage or to disrupt telecommunications. Huawei has disputed this.
  • Google isn’t a front door to the internet. It’s the whole house: Bloomberg News traces Google’s slow march from directing people elsewhere online to keeping us inside its digital walls for weather, random facts, news, shopping and more. This has implications for government investigations into whether Google unfairly uses its power to help itself.

Hugs to this

Uncertain times call for … a long Twitter thread of cat photos. (Plus one cuttlefish, I think, and a dog with bat wings.)

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you’d like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

A plague of petty grievances

People having fun isn't the reason the virus is winning.
A bartender in Corpus Christi, Texas where cases of COVID-19 have recently spiked.Christopher Lee for The New York Times
Author Headshot

By Paul Krugman

Opinion Columnist

The great re-closing has begun. California is entering a de facto second lockdown. Many southern states, which actually have worse outbreaks than California, should be doing the same, although it seems all too likely that Republican governors will, true to form, wait too long to take effective actions. Nonetheless, it’s now clear that the rush to resume normal life was an act of immense folly, for which we will pay a heavy price in both lives and money.

In today’s column, I emphasized, in particular, the folly of permitting large gatherings and opening bars. This was in part, I have to admit, because I liked the rhetorical device of suggesting that we compromised our children’s future so we could go out drinking. But it’s also true that drinking in groups, a situation in which people naturally become loud and boisterous, has to be among the activities most likely to fuel a pandemic spread by airborne droplets.

It occurs to me, however, that some readers might think that I have a problem with the idea of people having fun, or that I think we got into this mess because people wanted to have a good time. I plead not guilty on both counts.

There may be an element of censoriousness in some critiques of reopening; enough with the photos of crowded beaches! But Puritanism, which H.L. Mencken famously described as “the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy,” wasn’t a major factor in the alarm I and others felt as we barreled toward our current crisis.

ADVERTISEMENT

And for what it’s worth, while bars aren’t my thing, indie music concerts — lots of people standing in a small space, beers in hand while the performers and sometimes the audience sing — are. Today’s music selection is a video I shot eight months, and an eternity, ago.

Nor do I believe that the natural human desire for a good time is what got us into our current crisis.

People are people, and can’t be expected to behave with inhuman self-restraint. Anyone who imagines that we can reopen colleges and expect undergraduates to practice social distancing has forgotten what it was like to be 19.

But fun-loving young people didn’t drive the disastrous March/April push to LIBERATE (as Donald Trump put it) states under lockdown. Much of that push, instead, came from the top down — from Trump and his allies who wanted to goose the stock market, from business interests who wanted to bring back lost profits.

ADVERTISEMENT

And the psychology behind grass roots opposition to social distancing — behind all those people raging against being required to wear a face mask — doesn’t have much if anything to do with a desire to enjoy life.

What it reflects, instead — or at least that’s what I believe — is a pervasive resentment among some Americans at the idea that they might be asked to bear any burden, even a small inconvenience, for the sake of others. In fact, the small inconveniences seem to provoke the biggest displays of rage.

I first noticed this phenomenon decades ago, when I was living in Massachusetts and saw how a local talk radio host whipped up rage against the state’s mandatory seatbelt law. (The law was reinstated after a surge in deaths.) I’ve seen it on environmental issues, with right-wing pundits suggesting violent action against local officials over things like the ban on phosphates in detergents — hey, this was meant to prevent toxic algal blooms, but possibly means that your dishwasher doesn’t work quite as well.

In other words, the problem isn’t people who want to enjoy themselves, it’s people who act out their petty grievances — encouraged and empowered by the pettiest, most grievance-filled man ever to occupy the White House. And in the face of a pandemic, pettiness can be lethal.

ADVERTISEMENT

Quick Hits

How New York and its governor, after a bad start, rose to the occasion.

Arizona’s governor didn’t, and the public has noticed.

The president doesn’t need experts, he can listen to game show hosts.

Of course Stephen Moore is leading the smear campaign against Anthony Fauci.

Feedback

If you’re enjoying what you’re reading, please consider recommending it to friends. They can sign up here. If you want to share your thoughts on an item in this week’s newsletter or on the newsletter in general, please email me at krugman-newsletter@nytimes.com.

Facing the Music

I’m not into bars, but I am into concertsYouTube

I shot this on my phone at Rockwood Music Hall last November — without magnification. (I got a friend to hold my beer.) How long it will be before we can have experiences like this again?

IN THE TIMES

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Paul Krugman from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

2020年7月13日 星期一

Top 18 Best Websites To Learn Hacking 2018

  • Black Hat: The Black Hat Briefings have become the biggest and the most important security conference series in the world by sticking to our core value: serving the information security community by delivering timely, actionable security information in a friendly, vendor-neutral environment.
  • Hack Forums: Emphasis on white hat, with categories for hacking, coding and computer security.
  • HackRead: HackRead is a News Platform that centers on InfoSec, Cyber Crime, Privacy, Surveillance, and Hacking News with full-scale reviews on Social Media Platforms.
  • DEFCON: Information about the largest annual hacker convention in the US, including past speeches, video, archives, and updates on the next upcoming show as well as links and other details.
  • NFOHump: Offers up-to-date .NFO files and reviews on the latest pirate software releases.
  • Metasploit: Find security issues, verify vulnerability mitigations & manage security assessments with Metasploit. Get the worlds best penetration testing software now.
  • Makezine: Magazine that celebrates your right to tweak, hack, and bend any technology to your own will.
  • SecurityFocus: Provides security information to all members of the security community, from end users, security hobbyists and network administrators to security consultants, IT Managers, CIOs and CSOs.
  • Phrack Magazine: Digital hacking magazine.
  • Hackaday: A hardware hack every day.
  • Exploit DB: An archive of exploits and vulnerable software by Offensive Security. The site collects exploits from submissions and mailing lists and concentrates them in a single database.
  • The Hacker News: The Hacker News — most trusted and widely-acknowledged online cyber security news magazine with in-depth technical coverage for cybersecurity.
  • KitPloit: Leading source of Security Tools, Hacking Tools, CyberSecurity and Network Security.
  • SecTools.Org: List of 75 security tools based on a 2003 vote by hackers.
  • Offensive Security Training: Developers of Kali Linux and Exploit DB, and the creators of the Metasploit Unleashed and Penetration Testing with Kali Linux course.
  • Packet Storm: Information Security Services, News, Files, Tools, Exploits, Advisories and Whitepapers.
  • Hakin9: E-magazine offering in-depth looks at both attack and defense techniques and concentrates on difficult technical issues.
  • Hacked Gadgets: A resource for DIY project documentation as well as general gadget and technology news.