2020年7月15日 星期三

They Go to Mommy First

How the pandemic is disproportionately disrupting mothers’ careers.

They Go to Mommy First

Monica Garwood

Maggie Levine was on maternity leave from her job as a children’s librarian in Boston for the first few months of the pandemic, but she started working again in the middle of May. She and her husband, James Maher, an engineer, had no outside child care between mid-May and early July, while she was working from home and he was working part time from home and part time from the office. They were both caring for their baby, who is now 9 months old.

“I’m usually expected to do 35 hours a week, and I have been hitting, I would say, 10,” Levine said, “which would be a really generous way of thinking about the time I’m able to put in.”

When I asked Maher how many hours a week he worked in pre-pandemic times, compared to how many hours he works now: “My usual is around 40, and I’m probably hitting around 40,” he said.

Levine and Maher are representative of a nationwide trend. A pre-print of a study soon to be published in the academic journal Gender, Work & Organization showed that in heterosexual couples where both the mother and father were continuously employed and have children under 13, mothers “have reduced their work hours four to five times more than fathers.” This has exacerbated the gender gap in work hours by 20 to 50 percent, the study found.

ADVERTISEMENT

William Scarborough, Ph.D., an assistant professor of sociology at the University of North Texas and a co-author of the study, said that he and his colleagues analyzed data from the Current Population Survey, because that data set followed the same group of families from February to April.

“It created this good empirical opportunity to see what mothers' and fathers’ work hours were prior to the pandemic, and how they changed at the peak when schools and day cares across the country closed down,” Dr. Scarborough said.

While the parents examined in this study were not a nationally representative group — they are dual earning, straight married couples who tended to be middle or upper class, and many had jobs that could be done from home — the study’s findings were consistent with other research about who handles the majority of child care during the pandemic.

A Syracuse University research brief examined data from the Census Household Pulse survey, conducted in late April and early May, and found that over 80 percent of U.S. adults who weren’t working because they had to care for their children who were not in school or day care were women.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr. Scarborough said that their study did not examine why women whose work circumstances were the same as their husbands were doing more of the child care. However, he said that his co-author, Caitlyn Collins, an assistant professor of sociology at Washington University, speculated that part of the issue may be that “when a child needs help, they go to mommy first,” and over days and weeks, that has a cumulative, undermining effect.

Nick Kahl, the dad of a 2-year-old in Portland, Ore., and a lawyer in private practice, said his son doesn’t interrupt him as much as he interrupts his wife, Jenny Smith, who is the communications director of a state agency.

Terri E. Givens, a mom of two boys in Menlo Park, Calif and the chief executive and founder of a company that provides career development for academic leaders, had another explanation for the gender disparity: Moms are the emotional barometers for the household, and they’re managing an unseen amount of extra work, thinking about child care, dentist appointments and the happiness of their children, even when men are making an effort. “My husband is one of the best you’ll find,” she said of her spouse, who is an engineer. “But it’s that emotional labor that’s really hard to quantify.”

Sandi Villarreal, the executive editor of Sojourners, a Christian social justice magazine, said that her husband, Michael Middaugh, a pastor of a Lutheran church in Silver Spring, Md., is doing the same amount, if not more, of the caretaking for their three children, ages 6, 4, and almost 1, because his schedule is more flexible than hers — for now.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t know what’s going to happen when church starts to reopen in August,” Villarreal said. Her husband will no longer be able to solely telecommute and he will have to go in for services. They have a nanny coming one day a week right now, but the situation is not sustainable.

“I think at some point it’s going to give,” Villareal said of their tenuous arrangement. “I think the hard part is there’s no end in sight.”

Want More on the Gender Gap in Child Care and Working from Home?

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let’s celebrate the tiny victories.
When my 2-year-old fell and started to cry, I said, “Can you show me your Hulk muscles?” Tears were replaced by superhero grunts and muscle displays! — Sarah Bielecki, California

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for NYT Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

2020年7月14日 星期二

On Tech: How to fight health ‘cures’ online

Junk health information that preys on people's fears spreads online. Here's how we can stamp it out.

How to fight health ‘cures’ online

Erik Carter

Anne Borden King had already battled online health misinformation as a parent of a child with autism. Then, as a patient, she was barraged on Facebook by bogus cancer “cure” advertisements after posting about her diagnosis.

Borden, a co-founder of the Campaign Against Phony Autism Cures, talked to me about what we and Facebook can do to stamp out the worst kinds of junk health information that preys on people’s fears. It requires us to have some uncomfortable conversations, and for Facebook to fundamentally change how it works.

Stories like Borden’s feel distressingly familiar. Internet grifters looking to make money have been responsible for spreading false vaccine conspiracies online or selling illegal drugs. And because our health is a perennial anxiety, there’s a big market for false hope.

“You can’t get rid of the impetus for pseudoscience, but you can stop a lot of vulnerable people from being exploited,” Borden said.

First, let’s discuss what Facebook can do to stop this. “Only take as many ads as they have time for humans for review,” Borden said. “That’s the only ethical thing they can do.”

This one is a doozy. Advertising online tends to be more automated than it is for TV or newspapers. Facebook and Google do have people and computer systems to weed out some inappropriate ads, but many are purchased without much human intervention.

ADVERTISEMENT

Borden is essentially saying that automated advertising is too risky, at least for health-related products. (A Facebook spokeswoman declined to comment.)

Like many proposed fixes for our popular internet hangouts, Borden’s suggestion boils down to making social media more like conventional media. That’s what critics of Facebook or other online companies mean when they say that these companies should add context to politicians’ inflammatory statements posted on their sites, or that they shouldn’t be a forum for all ideas.

Borden is less worried about your friends spreading bogus health information online, and wants Facebook to focus on stamping out financially motivated people behind the ads she saw or what she called “stealth marketing.” Borden said companies set up Facebook groups that promote themselves as online support networks but really serve to push unproven health treatments.

As for what we can do about junk health ads, Borden said that every time you see what looks like a sketchy health advertisement on Facebook, you should report it. That flags the ad for review by Facebook and possible removal.

Borden also had advice for how to talk to people we know about health misinformation.

She said she waited a long time to tell people about her cancer diagnosis because she dreaded friends or acquaintances telling her about “alternative” treatments. We might want to brush off unhelpful advice, but these personal conversations can be a starting point to steer people away from pseudoscience. (These tips on how to talk to loved ones about conspiracy theories might help, too.)

ADVERTISEMENT

Borden said, however, that she saw arguing with strangers online about health misinformation as pointless.

She is heartened that the pandemic has made all of us, government officials and internet companies more aware of the dangers of health misinformation.

“Some of those people that we’ve been complaining about for years are finally being regulated, because of coronavirus,” Borden said.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Digital changed everything. That’s the problem.

There’s a paradox behind many of the digital services we love: The qualities that make them successful and useful can also make them risky or exploitative.

Take those precisely targeted Facebook ads that pitched bogus cancer cures as soon as Borden posted about her diagnosis. They’re a result of Facebook gathering huge amounts of information about us to pinpoint product ads at those of us who might be most receptive to the message.

If you’re a small business and those finely targeted ads help you sell your homemade patterns to sewing hobbyists, the Facebook system is incredibly useful. The dark side is this same setup makes Facebook like candy to modern-day snake-oil salesmen.

And it’s not just Facebook. Uber and Lyft let almost anyone be a self-employed taxi driver. But now some drivers and government officials are asking whether treating drivers as independent contractors rather than employees with the right to receive benefits is fair.

Amazon’s sprawling network of merchants lets it sell almost any product imaginable. That’s incredibly useful, and also extremely dangerous, for shoppers like us.

I don’t know how to resolve this. These companies and other digital powerhouses brought us something different because they ditched the usual conventions about how advertising should work, what a job looks like and the limits of store shelves. It’s wonderful. And also awful.

Before we go …

  • Should you delete TikTok? A Washington Post columnist looked under the hood of the app and found it siphoned no more data from your phone than Facebook did. (This is not a compliment, and he has suggestions to limit the snooping.)This doesn’t solve, however, what some American politicians fear — that because TikTok is owned by a Chinese company, it is beholden to a government that might force it to spy on Americans or censor people to China’s liking. TikTok says it wouldn’t do that.
  • Also in fears of Chinese spying: After pressure from the U.S. government, Britain said it would ban equipment from the Chinese technology giant Huawei from the country’s high-speed wireless network, my colleagues Adam Satariano and Stephen Castle reported. As with TikTok, one big government fear is that Huawei’s home country might order the company to use its equipment for espionage or to disrupt telecommunications. Huawei has disputed this.
  • Google isn’t a front door to the internet. It’s the whole house: Bloomberg News traces Google’s slow march from directing people elsewhere online to keeping us inside its digital walls for weather, random facts, news, shopping and more. This has implications for government investigations into whether Google unfairly uses its power to help itself.

Hugs to this

Uncertain times call for … a long Twitter thread of cat photos. (Plus one cuttlefish, I think, and a dog with bat wings.)

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you’d like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018