2020年9月1日 星期二

On Tech: Yes to tech optimism. And pessimism.

We need tech optimists to shoot for the moon. But we also need those looking for problems.

Yes to tech optimism. And pessimism.

Tim Peacock

I recently made a promise to myself, and I would like you to join me. When I consider something new bubbling up in technology, I have vowed not to get overly excited about either its potential benefits or its downsides.

I know nuance is rare these days, but please join me in the vast zone of complexity between “wow, cool!” and “that won’t work” or “that’s evil!” I want to live in those shades of gray.

I’ve been thinking about this gray zone because of two things: a tweet and Elon Musk.

Sriram Krishnan, a technology executive whom I respect, tweeted a few days ago asking for more optimistic descriptions in movies and television of people building technology. He didn’t put it quite this way, but I imagined he wanted less fiction like “The Circle,” about a surveillance-state corporate cult, and more like “Iron Man,” in which a tech nerd cobbles together a suit that saves his life and gives him superhero powers.

I get what Krishnan is saying, and there’s a bigger meaning behind it. Right now, there’s a lot of pessimism about the harm of social media, the creepiness of digital surveillance of our smartphones and our faces and the nefarious power of tech giants.

Those downers sometimes drown out the ways that we know technology has made many of our lives immeasurably better. Both “The Circle” and “Iron Man” encompass some form of reality, but it’s easy to see technology as either one or the other.

ADVERTISEMENT

You could see that in reactions to Musk’s flashy demonstration on Friday of brain-implanted computer chips that he hopes may someday help combat serious health conditions like strokes and spinal cord injuries.

Musk is a master showman, and every time he does an act about an underground car tunnel in Los Angeles or bulletproof electric pickup trucks, there is the same reaction: Some people say he is making amazing and life-changing innovations. And other people say that Musk’s promises are unproven and unoriginal hype.

I can’t predict what happens with Musk’s Neuralink company. Musk has repeatedly promised technology that doesn’t pan out or that seems pointless. His companies have also helped advance electric cars, enabled commercial space travel and forced the entire auto industry to rethink what cars combined with computers can do. Sometimes the doubters are right about Musk. But so are the cheerleaders.

That’s why I want both “The Circle” and “Iron Man.” I don’t know how to get the balance right, but it’s worth starting by acknowledging that both sunny and grumpy people have a point.

ADVERTISEMENT

We need tech optimists to shoot for the moon — literally, in Musk’s case. But I sometimes think tech companies also need to give more voice to chief pessimism officers who ask, what if this technology doesn’t work? Who might be harmed by this technology, and how can we prevent that? And do we need this at all? Give those Eeyores a corner office.

The tech downers and the “Iron Man”-loving optimists need each other more than ever. Technology is not something that exists in a bubble; it is a phenomenon that changes how we live or how our world works in ways that help and hurt.

That calls for more humility and bridges across the optimism-pessimism divide from people who make technology, those of us who write about it, government officials and the public. We need to think on the bright side. And we need to consider the horribles.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Your Lead

Support for Apple’s control over apps

I wrote in Monday’s newsletter about some app makers’ complaints that Apple has too much control over what iPhone apps people can download and charges unfairly high fees on some app purchases.

Some readers emailed to say that they sided with Apple exerting its power to keep the App Store safe, and that app makers get a good deal for the commissions Apple charges them. Here is selection of what they said:

“I really like that Apple closely scrutinizes apps before allowing them on the App Store. I had an Android previously and felt like it was more of the Wild West in terms of what apps might actually do or if they were in fact harmful. I therefore didn’t download many at all. I hope that things that matter to us users aren’t overlooked in how this squabble gets resolved.” — Vicki Rundquist, McHenry, Ill.

“What you specifically do not talk about is the convenience Apple gives it developers for placing an app within their environment. Apple does a whole lot of work to make it easy to use the App Store. I want Apple to control what is offered to us within its App Store. They want Apple to do a whole lot of work and then not even get paid for it." — Gordon Musch, Richmond, Va.

“I think Apple could resolve the dispute with Epic and avoid a possible finding that they are a monopoly by allowing users to sideload apps, but only after the users have received a series of scary warnings about how they are giving up the protection Apple gives them from malware. If the warnings are scary enough, I think most people would rather download from the App Store, even if they could sideload apps for less money.” — Blaine

(Note from Shira: “Sideloading” refers to downloading apps outside the official Android or Apple smartphone app stores. Apple doesn’t permit people to sideload apps. Android phones do, but Epic said that Google made it unfairly difficult.)

Before we go …

  • Pay attention to Australia’s proposed law on online news: Facebook (and Google) are suggesting that they might make it harder for people to share news stories online in response to a proposed Australian bill that would require the companies to pay news organizations for articles that appear on their sites. This is essentially a negotiation in public over the details of the proposed law.My colleagues Dai Wakabayashi and Mike Isaac write that the Australia example shows how government measures to restrain tech companies threaten to further erode the principle of a single unified internet.
  • The perfect encapsulation of the gig job market: Delivery drivers for Amazon and its Whole Foods supermarket have figured out a way to get first in line for orders. Some of them are perching smartphones from trees near grocery stores or delivery outposts, Bloomberg News found, because the software that dispatches Amazon delivery couriers doles out jobs to people who seem to be closest.
  • A pioneer of online learning is worried about online learning: Salman Khan, the creator of Khan Academy online learning videos, has tips for parents and schools doing remote learning: Opt for shorter online learning sessions for younger kids with more breaks, and have open conversations with schools about whether students are being asked to do too much.Khan also tells The Washington Post that he’s worried about children who are being left behind by remote school, and parents who are taking on too much.

Hugs to this

You might need a dose of good news as much as I do. Here is how people teamed up to rescue a young humpback whale that was stuck in a tangle of fishing gear.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you’d like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/

2020年8月31日 星期一

On Tech: Apple’s app war needs peace

Changes to Apple's app store could make developers' lives — and our smartphones — better.

Apple’s app war needs peace

Timo Lenzen

Your tween might be freaking out that she can’t play a new Fortnite video game on her iPhone. Or maybe you’ve heard that Spotify, Tinder, Facebook and a small email company are fuming about how Apple treats their apps.

Apple has an iron grip on what apps people can download on their iPhones, and some app makers are complaining loudly about this arrangement as well as the fees that Apple collects from some apps.

This feels like an intractable standoff, with app users caught in the middle. But there are nuts-and-bolts changes that Apple could make to tackle the bureaucracy, unpredictability and unfairness of the app world.

These changes won’t end all of these conflicts, which are starting to deprive people of apps or make them confusing and expensive to use. But the app system could be made better even without a truce.

I asked for ideas on how Apple could improve the app store from Jacob Eiting, a founder of RevenueCat, which helps app makers design in-app purchases and knows what drives developers crazy.

Specify how developers can fix rejected apps: Apple says yes or no to each new iPhone app or app update, based on the company’s 12,700-word app rule book — not including addendums. (The United States Constitution plus all the amendments runs for 7,600 words.)

ADVERTISEMENT

Eiting said developers sometimes get rejection letters that simply recite a portion of Apple’s rules. He said it would be more helpful if Apple’s staff offered specific suggestions for what developers could change — sometimes as minor as tweaking a menu — to get the app approved.

Improve Apple’s payments technology: Eiting said it could take weeks or longer for app makers to write software that links their app to Apple’s proprietary system for people to pay for stuff with a fingerprint or face scan. Creating software hookups with other payments technology is much simpler, Eiting said.

Clarify the gray zone: Apple has two categories of app purchases: When you buy something virtual, like an e-book, Apple collects from the app maker a fee of up to 30 percent on the purchase. When you buy something to use in the real world, like a physical book or an Uber ride, Apple doesn’t charge a fee.

But an increasing number of apps offer services that are somewhere between real and virtual — personal training or cooking classes conducted over an app, for example.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eiting said Apple needed to clarify when the company will assess commissions on apps that offer these hybrid activities. Confusion over this question is stopping some apps before they even start, he said.

Consider an independent app review: There are inevitable questions about conflict of interest between app makers and Apple’s own apps that compete with them. The founders of Blix, an email app maker that has fought with Apple, suggested to me that Apple create an independent app review process to make sure it isn’t unfairly punishing rival apps.

Apple has in the past made changes to its app system to respond to developers’ complaints, and the company told me it’s always open to more. Any tweaks, though, won’t go as far as some app makers want: essentially, to blow up Apple’s control over what apps are allowed on people’s iPhones.

But it’s still possible to revamp the app system in ways that could bring more calm for Apple, developers and our smartphone-dependent lives.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tip of the Week

How to make smartphone apps less annoying

Brian X. Chen, the consumer technology columnist for The New York Times, offers these helpful tips to tame the apps that nag us too much or bog down our phones:

Apps can make our lives better. But some pester you with too many notifications, and others hog too much battery life or device storage.

Here are four steps you can take to minimize app nuisances:

1) Declutter: Purge all the apps you haven’t used for a long time.

2) Find and eliminate the storage hogs: On iPhones, go to Settings > General > iPhone Storage to see a list of the apps that are taking up the most space on your device. Select each one of them and follow the recommendations to reduce their load.

On Android devices, use Google’s tool called Files, which has an option to sort apps on your device by the biggest storage hogs.

3) Minimize notifications: On iPhones, go to Settings > Notifications to see a switchboard of apps that send notifications. On Androids, do the same thing by opening Settings > Apps & Notifications > Notifications.

From there, turn off notifications for all but the most important apps such as messaging and email.

4) Find the battery suckers: Be on the lookout for apps that are active for extended periods, even when you’re not using them, as this can drain your battery life.

On iPhones and Android phones, open the Settings app, and in the Battery menu, there are sorted lists of apps that are using the most energy.

On the iPhone’s battery usage screen, tap on an app to reveal information about how much of your battery life it is consuming when you’re actively using it (“on screen”) compared with when you’re not (“background”).

On Android devices, the most useful information is the timers for “CPU total” and “CPU foreground.” Foreground is how much time you had the app open; subtract “foreground” from “total,” and you’ll know how much time it has been chipping away at your battery even when you haven’t been using it.

When you find a battery-sucking culprit, go to the app’s individual settings and turn off some features to minimize its power usage.

Before we go …

  • We have no clue what’s happening with TikTok: The app might be shut down in the United States soon, or get sold and stay alive, or face something else entirely. The latest twist my colleagues reported: The government of China, the home country of TikTok’s current owner, ByteDance, revised its rules in ways that might — as the U.S. government has done — dictate who gets to own TikTok based on national security guidelines.
  • Episode 4 zillion of tech companies’ reality contradicting their idealism: Erin Griffith, who writes about young tech companies for The Times, takes us inside the conflicts at Carta. This start-up was built to give workers more power at their companies and help close gaps in pay and workplace treatment for women. But Erin reported that some of Carta’s employees — many of them women — said that they were mistreated and underpaid by their own employer, and that their complaints were ignored or worse.
  • Virtual school might mean missing out on special education: With many school districts in the United States restarting at least in part online this fall, it’s not clear whether children with disabilities will be able to receive physical or occupational therapy or other forms of specialized instruction that they often get in school, The Wall Street Journal reported.

Hugs to this

I recently learned that a shore bird called the Wilson’s Phalarope spins in the water to create a vortex that sucks in insects and other tasty treats. A whole marsh of these spinning birds, as this 2013 video shows, is quite a sight.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you’d like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/