2020年9月15日 星期二

On Tech: Apple Watch is a private road

With newer technologies, we risk losing the open highways that have defined our digital lives.

Apple Watch is a private road

Sean Dong

If you’re reading this right now on your iPhone or on a Windows laptop, that’s good for Apple and Microsoft.

It’s also good for Amazon, Zoom, Candy Crush and this newsletter, which can reach you because smartphones, tablets and personal computers created by others gave them a route to billions.

Think about the last quarter-century of computers and the internet like a highway. The companies that made gadgets and software systems controlled the roads, and cars made by other companies drove (with some restrictions) on those roads. Computer devices would be meh if we couldn’t have access to a diversity of apps, websites and software — and vice versa.

But newer technologies for interacting online — smart watches like the Apple Watch, voice activated speakers, internet-connected televisions and robot-piloted cars — mostly pull us into digital features the device maker creates or tightly controls. They are more like private roads than the open highways of the smartphone and PC eras.

These developing technologies could change, and I hope they do. I worry that we’ll miss the next Amazon or Zoom if the future is private roads without a diversity of cars.

Apple plans to show off on Tuesday the latest versions of its Apple Watch. Since it was first sold more than five years ago, the device remains mostly a place for people to live in Apple’s world.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yes, people do track calories with the MyFitnessPal app and look at the Weather Channel on their Apple Watches. But the watch is mostly a way for people to glance at their iPhone messages, use Apple’s activity tracking feature and listen to Apple Music. Other cars are allowed, but in practice it’s a road mostly of Apple vehicles.

Ditto for Amazon’s Echo. If you ask it to play Anita Baker songs or tell a joke, Amazon pulls from its own computer systems for the music or response unless you specify otherwise. Again, people do ask to listen to NPR and order a Domino’s pizza on their Echo speakers. But most people use their Echo devices for functions that Amazon built.

Closed or tightly controlled internet access points are becoming the norm rather than the exception. If you have a Roku or Vizio TV set, you can’t watch the HBO Max video app or Apple’s TV app unless there’s a business contract with the TV maker. (That’s not how computers and smartphones work.)

If internet-connected eyewear and autonomous cars get more prevalent, they’re also shaping up to be less open and more of a creation in which one company controls the physical equipment and what we do with it.

ADVERTISEMENT

This might make sense for complicated tech like cars. And private roads could be a temporary condition. The iPhone started out closed to non-Apple apps before the company changed its mind. I also don’t want to overstate how open our smartphone and computer highways are. Apple still approves or denies every iPhone app, for example.

Still, I think even the iPhone is more open to other software than TVs and the Apple Watch. The proof is in how people use them. Certainly by 2013 — five years after Apple opened the iPhone app store — apps from companies other than Apple were already a big thing. Not so five years into the Apple Watch.

It’s hard to predict how this will all shake out. But I worry that there would be no future Instacart or Netflix if we lost the relatively open highway system that has defined our digital lives for decades or if the companies that make our internet gateways confined them mostly to themselves.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Is Facebook too big to govern?

I have wrestled, as many people have, with whether Facebook makes people and the world worse. This may have been my breaking point.

A relatively junior data scientist who was fired from Facebook wrote a memo detailing how politicians, political parties and others in various countries including Honduras, Bolivia, Ukraine, Brazil and Azerbaijan used automated accounts and other means to mislead people or harass their opponents.

It’s not news that Facebook is used to mislead or bully. But even I was surprised by the scale of the manipulation campaigns that the former employee, Sophie Zhang, described — both the number of countries involved and the amount of manipulation taking place.

BuzzFeed News and my colleague Sheera Frenkel wrote about her memo.

This is the view of one person. It’s also hard to know what impact these misinformation campaigns and abuses had in these countries. Ethnic violence and manipulative politicians were problems long before social media existed. Facebook told Sheera that it removed coordinated influence campaigns, and that it had a large team working on security.

But Zhang’s memo resonated with me because you can feel her torment at how little she was able to do, and how she felt unsupported by her bosses. It made me wonder: Should Facebook be essential communications in much of the world?

Zhang wrote that she believed the Facebook bosses meant well but couldn’t deal with all but the highest profile misuses of the site outside the United States and Western Europe.

She also echoed what we already knew. It’s relatively easy to sow chaos on Facebook, but harder to rein it in, with sometimes deadly effects.

Now what? Is such a toxic stew of misleading information an inevitability? Is any gathering spot of billions of people too sprawling and dangerous to exist — is Facebook “too big to govern responsibly” as my Opinion colleague Charlie Warzel wrote? I don’t know. I need to sit with this one for a while.

Before we go …

  • They use technology to make technology better and less exclusionary: Young people who work in technology are teaming up to counterbalance what can be an insular industry, and combat abuses of technology products, my colleague Taylor Lorenz wrote.One teenager built a tool to protect people from harassment on Twitter. A group built an online bulletin board aimed at spreading positivity. The goal of this loose collective, one person told Taylor, is to “build a more positive internet, things that help people.”
  • This was all rather pointless: The latest on the tug-of-war over the Chinese video app TikTok from my colleagues: People involved in the company decided on a compromise that didn’t involve ownership moving to the United States or a change to TikTok’s contentious software, as the White House previously insisted on. In short, not much happened after months of drama and wasted time and money. (Here’s my take on it from Monday’s newsletter.)
  • ‘Jeopardy!’ in Zoom: The quiz show is adapting to the moment by filming new episodes with detached booths replacing the typical contestant podiums, people’s photos on sticks as audience members and auditions conducted over Zoom video. The Ringer takes us inside a game show remade for a pandemic.

Hugs to this

I love this cat sitting on the low note keys to “help” play a Van Halen tune. (Here’s the original song. Without cat.)

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you’d like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/

2020年9月14日 星期一

On Tech: TikTok was a wasted opportunity

The TikTok battle was a chance to debate big questions about technology and government. Not anymore.

TikTok was a wasted opportunity

Kiel Mutschelknaus

Creeping closer to resolving a monthslong saga over the future of TikTok in the United States, the Chinese video app looks likely to have a new American partner. TikTok will stay open in the United States. Probably.

Behind the mess over TikTok were profound questions for Americans: What should we do about technology companies that can influence our understanding of the world — whether it’s TikTok or Facebook? And what should the United States do about a future in which technology is becoming less American?

The future of TikTok might be — maybe! — close to a resolution, but those important questions remain untouched. We learned nothing from this big, ugly drama.

Let me catch you up: TikTok, an app for short videos that took off in the United States and other countries, is owned by the Chinese internet giant ByteDance. It’s one of the first popular global internet gathering spots to have originated in China, and that has caused consternation in the United States and some other countries.

Because there’s not much daylight between corporations and the state in China, some American officials worried that TikTok could become a way for China’s government to gather information about Americans or spread a Chinese-friendly view to the world. ByteDance has said it acted independently from China’s government.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the last few months, the U.S. government seemed to decide that TikTok must either sell its U.S. operations to an American company and untangle itself from China, or shut down in the United States. This ordeal became strange, political and confusing.

And then over the weekend it got stranger. Microsoft, which seemed like the likeliest new American owner for TikTok, said ByteDance turned it down. China’s government might have been behind this decision.

It looks like Oracle, another American tech company, is going to step in as a red, white and blue partner for TikTok. It’s not clear how this Oracle arrangement will work, but the U.S. treasury secretary on Monday gave his qualified support for the deal.

For now it seems that TikTok’s data on Americans will run over Oracle’s computers — Oracle will be a hall monitor, presumably giving TikTok a buffer from China.

ADVERTISEMENT

If this is the outcome for TikTok, I’m not sure this resolved any of the concerns about its links to China. TikTok will still be owned at least in part by a Chinese company, so the possibility of Chinese government interference remains.

Even more, this whole ordeal feels like a wasted opportunity to tackle big-picture questions that go far beyond this one app.

One significant feature of TikTok is software that decides to show me videos about tortoises, and someone else videos filled with conspiracies. This personalized software makes TikTok engaging, but it also gives the company enormous influence over what we see and ultimately what many people believe.

Secret software formulas derived from databases of our behavior also drive Facebook, Google and many other internet companies. It appears that nowhere in the political fighting about TikTok did anyone in the U.S. government or industry take the opportunity to ask what should U.S. lawmakers, regulators and the public do about this software power of persuasion.

ADVERTISEMENT

(I don’t want to take this equivalence too far. Americans understandably might be more concerned about a Chinese company helping shape people’s views than an American one like Facebook or Google.)

Anxiety about TikTok — and Huawei, the Chinese company that is increasingly building the backbone of the world’s internet and mobile phone networks — also boiled down to another big question: After a half century of American technology and corporations ruling the world, what should the U.S. government do about important technology coming from other countries, particularly those that we believe have values contrary to our own?

Can and should the United States try to wall off technology that doesn’t respect borders? Maybe the U.S. government should be investing more in developing homegrown technology — something it didn’t do years ago in telecommunications tech, arguably setting the stage for Huawei to dominate this area.

The fight about TikTok wasn’t only about TikTok. It should have been a moment for engaged debate about what Americans should expect out of our technology and our government. Instead, the big questions went unasked and unanswered.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

What 5G really means

Brian X. Chen, the consumer technology columnist for The New York Times, explains what the next generation of wireless internet technology called 5G will mean for us. Read this before you buy a new smartphone that you think is “faster.”

Phone companies like AT&T have done a poor job explaining what 5G can do — and what it can’t do. It’s not as simple as “5G is faster” because there are different types of the technology, and some phones will work with only some variations.

Here’s a primer on 5G. I’ll explain using ice cream flavors:

The ultrafast type of 5G known as “millimeter wave” is like rocky road.

Data moves around on rocky road so fast that you could download a movie on your phone in seconds. But rocky road can travel only short distances, covering a park but not a whole city.

Millimeter wave also has trouble penetrating walls in your home or other obstacles.

Because of these limitations, most Americans won’t have rocky road available soon, if ever.

Instead, this year our cellular networks will broadly shift to a less exciting version of 5G. Think of it as vanilla 5G.

Vanilla 5G will surf the internet slightly faster — like 20 percent faster — than current cellphone networks. The main benefit will be less lag time, known as latency. In theory, when you do a web search on your phone using this, the results should load after a few milliseconds rather than hundreds of milliseconds.

AT&T and Verizon say their 5G networks, which will be mostly vanilla 5G with small scoops of rocky road, should be activated nationwide this year. T-Mobile, which put a priority on vanilla, said its 5G network was available nationwide last year.

Technologists say that in the long run, 5G will enable self-driving cars and virtual reality. For now, you and your smartphone probably won’t be blown away by it.

Before we go …

  • She has the best or worst job in technology: Vanessa Pappas, the executive who was named the boss of TikTok six weeks ago, is trying to cater to the people who keep the apps filled with fun and creative videos. My colleagues Mike Isaac and Taylor Lorenz write that this hasn’t been easy with TikTok stuck between two global superpowers and challenged by a copycat from Facebook.
  • A potential new smartphone kingmaker entered the picture: The British computer chip company whose designs are baked into almost every smartphone agreed to sell itself to the American chip company Nvidia. My colleague Don Clark wrote that this combination “would instantly transform Nvidia into one of the most influential players in smartphone technology.” It’s also a safe bet that governments are going to worry about Nvidia’s power over essential technologies.
  • Internet companies shape reality, example infinity: Facebook over the weekend said it started to take down posts that helped spread false rumors about wildfires, including that left-wing activists started some of the fires.This step — plus actions like Facebook, Google and Twitter trying to limit election misinformation — shows that these companies are increasingly aware of their role in exacerbating people’s anxieties in difficult times.

Hugs to this

Please admire Lancelot, the young heron who couldn’t fly very well or care for himself and needed some human help.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you’d like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/