2020年9月25日 星期五

The Daily: Night Walks and Letters

As wildfires blaze across the West, a producer and a poet build “a world out of words.”
Author Headshot

By Bianca Giaever

Last Friday’s special episode was recorded in this trailer.Bianca Giaever

The seed for last Friday’s afternoon episode was planted one month and 18 days ago, when I received an email from the writer Terry Tempest Williams, who lives in Utah. She said that she enjoyed a podcast that I had made, and her email ended: “It is brutally hot here — You can burn grasses with your stare. I have taken to Night Walking.”

Listless and lonely in our pandemic bubbles, we decided to embark on a personal project together. From our separate locations, we agreed to go on a night walk every night for 16 nights in a row, from the new moon until the full moon. After the walk, we would write each other a letter, record ourselves reading it and send it.

Each morning I woke up to a new letter — a gift. Terry told me about her cats (Winslow Homer and Issa), the opening of the datura flower and an ant carrying a blossom. For me, the night walks were about establishing a relationship to the natural world, and a capacity to observe it, as an adult.

After the project ended, we didn’t speak for a couple of weeks and I flew to Los Angeles to visit friends. When I got here, the fires began. I stopped exercising, and a few days later I woke up in a panic, wondering: What were we actually losing in the fires? What would grow back and what wouldn’t? What is this anxiety I feel, and do others feel it too?

It felt obvious to ask Terry for her thoughts. She’s written about the American West for decades, and she speaks about the land the way other people speak about their lovers. So I emailed her with a phrase that had popped into my mind: “an obituary to the land.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Terry responded to this prompt, as she had with the letters. Then I called her and started recording.

That phone call lasted an hour. We talked about the smoldering skies, the importance of bearing witness, the hoarseness of our voices in the smoke and her relationship to the West. At our Daily team meeting, I pitched the idea of an afternoon episode that could provide some comfort, in the form of poetry, to our listeners. Terry gave me permission to use the audio from our phone call, and the next night we covered similar ground on a more official call.

It turned out that almost all of the audio we used in the piece was from the first call. As the editor Dave Shaw said: “The first take was from the heart. The second was from the brain.” Through the night walks, we had built a world out of words. When I picked up the phone during this crisis, she was ready to meet me there.

Talk to Bianca on Twitter: @biancagiaever.

ADVERTISEMENT

A landmark week

The night was young, by Daily team standards. It was 10:23 p.m. on Wednesday — meaning there was still a full seven hours before our publishing deadline. Our show on the Trump administration’s influence within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was researched, scripted and recorded. Michael even teased the episode on Twitter.

Then Andy Mills saw the news.

Reports were emerging that two police officers had been shot in Louisville, Ky., during a night of protests. The Kentucky attorney general had announced that no officers would be charged in the death of Breonna Taylor, while one former detective was charged with three counts of “wanton endangerment in the first degree” for his actions during the raid of Breonna’s apartment. So Andy suggested a new show:

ADVERTISEMENT

“As a newer producer on the team, I felt like Andy was asking me to sprout another arm,” the producer Stella Tan said. “But once the surprise wore off, the adrenaline set in.”

So the producers called Rukmini Callimachi, who was on the ground covering the protests in Louisville, and scrambled to contact reporters, like John Eligon, who had been recording their coverage of the protests throughout the day. “Andy and our co-producer Luke Vander Ploeg are pros, and I had faith the team could pull it off with Rukmini’s expertise,” Stella said.

A few hours later, Michael rerecorded the top of the show — and let everyone on Twitter know we’d had a change of plans:

These screen shots capture what happens when a wild news cycle meets our daily turnaround. So instead of our usual newsletter recap, we thought we’d give you a bit more insight into the making of our other shows this week:

Monday: After hearing about the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg last Friday night, our team got on a weekend call. As we wondered how best to understand her legacy, the politics and import of the moment came flooding in as Republican leaders began issuing statements about her replacement. Ultimately, that meant we made two shows for one morning — one about her life, and one about what might happen on the bench after her death.

Tuesday: Making polls interesting can be hard. And capturing the nuance behind the numbers? Even harder. This week, the producer Robert Jimison had the idea to call voters to hear the opinions, and life experiences, that informed their responses to The Times’s recent polling of swing states. And after the death of Justice Ginsburg, we wanted to ask voters directly if their vote had changed. When we asked our colleagues at The Upshot about respondents who said they could be contacted, they gave us a list of nearly a hundred. Listen in on our conversations with swing voters across the country.

Wednesday: In covering the current battle over Justice Ginsburg’s open seat, “we wanted to understand the perspective of someone who was viewing this moment as an opportunity and a culmination of a decades-long effort,” our producer Rachel Quester said. So we called Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, an anti-abortion group, who believes this moment will help her organization shape the future of abortion rights in America for years to come.

Friday: Our series The Field returned today, with the familiar voices of Austin Mitchell, a producer, and Astead Herndon, who covers national politics, reporting from the ground in Minneapolis on whether police reform may become a defining issue in the election. Here’s a behind-the-scenes look at what it took to get out in the field, pandemic style:

Austin en route to Minneapolis, face shield in check.Austin Mitchell

Introducing ‘Sway,’ a new podcast from Opinion

Nancy Pelosi.Damon Winter/The New York Times

This week, our colleagues in Opinion Audio kicked off a new podcast called “Sway,” hosted by Kara Swisher. It’s a podcast about power — who has it, who has been denied it and how it shapes our lives.

In the premiere episode, Kara interviewed the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, about the ambitions — and limits — of her influence. “If the election were held today, we would win it all,” Ms. Pelosi notably told Kara. And on Thursday, Kara spoke with the California governor, Gavin Newsom, about how, 20 months into his term, he’s confronting the state’s dual crises of the pandemic and the wildfires.

Subscribe to Sway for a new episode every Monday and Thursday.

That’s it for The Daily newsletter. See you next week.

Have thoughts about the show? Tell us what you think at thedaily@nytimes.com.

Were you forwarded this newsletter? Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox.

Love podcasts? Join The New York Times Podcast Club on Facebook.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for The Daily from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

The Shook Ones

Why President Trump and his allies are so desperate to attack the election.
Brendan Smialowski/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Author Headshot

By Jamelle Bouie

Opinion Columnist

If Donald Trump were ahead in the polls, he wouldn’t shut up about it. Every tweet, every quip or comment would be about his lead over Joe Biden. He would gloat and brag from here until Election Day.

Of course, Trump is not winning. He trails Biden by seven points in FiveThirtyEight’s national average and by an average of six points in the three states (Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania) that will determine the election. He’s tied or slightly behind in must-win states like Florida and Ohio, and he may well lose competitive states like Arizona and North Carolina. More important, Biden is consistently above 50 percent support in national polling, and Trump struggles to outperform his historically low disapproval.

The president is in bad shape, which is why he spends all of his time attacking the election itself. It’s why he’s on a crusade against mail-in ballots. And it’s why his campaign is plotting ways to install Trump as president in defiance of the will of the voters. One of those plots, reported Barton Gellman in The Atlantic, involves Republican legislatures in contested states unilaterally assigning electoral votes to President Trump.

According to sources in the Republican Party at the state and national levels, the Trump campaign is discussing contingency plans to bypass election results and appoint loyal electors in battleground states where Republicans hold the legislative majority. With a justification based on claims of rampant fraud, Trump would ask state legislators to set aside the popular vote and exercise their power to choose a slate of electors directly.

There’s no denying this is scary, as is President Trump’s clear desire to throw the election to a Supreme Court stacked with his appointees. But it is important to remember, as my colleague Michelle Goldberg notes, that Trump is working from a position of weakness. These are the last graspings of a desperate would-be autocrat. They’re still dangerous — perhaps even more dangerous than what you would see if Trump were stronger — but they’re also a sign that the president’s opponents have the upper hand. Trump and his allies, to borrow from the rap group Mobb Deep, are shook.

ADVERTISEMENT

What I Wrote

My Tuesday column was a call to weaken the power of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution:

If Democrats are willing to treat a Republican-dominated Supreme Court as a partisan and ideological foe, if they’re willing to change or transform it rather than accede to its view of the Constitution — two very big ifs — then they’re one important step along the path to challenging judicial supremacy, the idea that the courts, and the courts alone, determine constitutional meaning.

My Friday column was a look at the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the current Supreme Court fight and the underlying dispute over the nature of the Constitution:

There is no one-to-one comparison from the past to current events; there never is. But drawing on the Missouri controversy, I do have an observation to make about our present situation. Once again, under the guise of ordinary political conflict, Americans are fighting a meta-legal battle over the meaning of both the Union and the Constitution.

Now Reading

James Oakes on slavery and capitalism at The Economic Historian.

Lili Loofbourow on the limits of the hypocrisy critique in Slate magazine.

Jefferson Cowie on the differing meanings of “freedom” in The Boston Review.

Mae Ngai on immigration reform in Dissent magazine.

ADVERTISEMENT

Feedback

If you’re enjoying what you’re reading, please consider recommending it to friends. They can sign up here. If you want to share your thoughts on an item in this week’s newsletter or on the newsletter in general, please email me at jamelle-newsletter@nytimes.com.

Photo of the Week

Jamelle Bouie

This is from my personal archive, a shot from the Taos Pueblo in New Mexico. I think we took this vacation in 2017, although it may have been 2016. Time has lost all meaning these days.

ADVERTISEMENT

Now Eating: Red Bean Stew

In the Bouie household, cold weather is soup and stew weather and specifically bean weather. This is a simple and tasty stew, best served with a drizzle of good olive oil, a dollop of sour cream and warm, crusty bread. A glass of red wine (maybe a Cabernet Franc) wouldn’t hurt either. Recipe from The New York Times’s Cooking section.

Ingredients

  • 1 pound (2¼ cups) red beans, washed, picked over and soaked for 6 hours or overnight in 2 quarts water
  • 2 tablespoons extra virgin olive oil
  • 1 medium or large onion, chopped
  • 2 carrots, peeled and chopped
  • 1 large or 2 small green bell peppers, diced
  • 6 garlic cloves, minced
  • 2 tablespoons sweet Hungarian paprika
  • 2 tablespoons tomato paste
  • 1 bay leaf
  • salt to taste
  • 1 teaspoon oregano
  • Pinch of cayenne
  • 2 tablespoons red wine vinegar
  • ½ teaspoon sugar
  • Freshly ground pepper
  • ½ cup minced fresh parsley, or a combination of parsley and dill

Directions

Drain the beans through a strainer set over a bowl. Place the beans in a large soup pot or Dutch oven. Measure the soaking water in the bowl, and add enough water to it to measure 2½ quarts. Add this to the pot with the beans, turn the heat to medium-high and bring to a gentle boil. Skim off any foam and/or bean skins.

Meanwhile, heat 1 tablespoon of the oil over medium heat in a large, heavy skillet and add the onions, carrots and peppers. Cook, stirring often, until the vegetables are tender and fragrant, about 8 to 10 minutes. Add 2 of the garlic cloves and continue to cook for another minute or so, until the garlic is fragrant. Season to taste with salt, add another tablespoon of oil and add the paprika. Cook, stirring, for a couple of minutes, until the vegetables are well coated with paprika and the mixture is aromatic. Add a ladleful of simmering water from the beans to the pan, stir with a wooden spoon or heatproof spatula, scraping the bottom and sides of the pan to deglaze, then stir this mixture into the beans. Add the tomato paste and bay leaf, reduce the heat, cover and simmer 1 hour.

Add the oregano, the remaining garlic cloves, salt to taste, cayenne, vinegar and sugar, and continue to simmer for another hour. The beans should be thoroughly tender and the broth thick and fragrant. Taste and adjust salt, and add more cayenne if desired. For a thicker stew, strain out 1 heaped cup of beans with a little liquid and purée. Stir back into the stew.

Just before serving, stir in the parsley.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Jamelle Bouie from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018