2020年10月16日 星期五

On Tech: Brace for holiday ‘shipageddon’

The pandemic and the holidays will make shipping a zoo. Shoppers, listen up.

Brace for holiday ‘shipageddon’

Loïc Schwaller

Online shopping has exploded during the pandemic. The holidays are approaching. What happens when these two forces collide?

The combination of our reliance on online shopping during a pandemic and our eagerness for online shopping during the holidays has made some e-commerce experts predict a “shipageddon” in the United States — delays and chaos as parcel companies already stretched thin also tackle a surge in holiday packages.

Retailers are sweating over how they’re going to move merchandise among their stores and handle extra expenses to deliver orders. And people who rely on home delivery might need to plan ahead for possible bottlenecks.

The potential for hiccups shows the complications when our zeal for shopping from home meets the physical limits of humans, warehouses stuffed to the rafters, roadways and ocean freight shipping. There’s always been a war to get stuff to our door. It’s just been one we usually ignore.

The problem is simple: Many of our buying habits completely changed in the pandemic, and our delivery networks cannot keep up. You might already have encountered this with weekslong delays on some Amazon orders or waking up at 4 a.m. to get an open slot from a grocery delivery company.

ADVERTISEMENT

Parcel companies like FedEx and UPS already struggle to handle extra orders each holiday season, and they’re expecting Christmas 2020 to stretch them to the limits. To try to discourage deliveries they can’t handle, the delivery companies have announced larger-than-usual additional fees for larger retailers during the holiday.

The practical tips for people planning their holiday shopping: If you’re that person who waits until the last minute … don’t. Really.

If you’re buying online or sending holiday gifts to loved ones by mail, it might take far longer than it has in previous years. The Postal Service is almost pleading with people to mail Christmas gifts early. (And if you rely on e-commerce sites for diapers or other household essentials, it’s probably not a bad idea to build a buffer ahead of potential end-of-year shipping delays.)

Jason Goldberg, the chief commerce strategy officer at the advertising giant Publicis who goes by the nickname “Retail Geek,” also said that retailers have less merchandise stocked up than usual for the holidays because the pandemic disrupted their typical inventory planning.

ADVERTISEMENT

That means you’re not likely to get cut-rate prices on Black Friday or the week before Christmas, because stores won’t discount merchandise that’s already in short supply. If there is a particular gift that you have your heart set on, it might not be there if you wait.

People may also want to consider alternatives to home delivery around the holidays. Ordering online for curbside pickup at stores, for example, skips strained delivery systems. Retailers are also trying alternative delivery options, including sending orders from local stores via couriers working for companies like Instacart and Shipt.

Scot Wingo, co-founder of ChannelAdvisor, which helps businesses sell online, said companies like Target that both have physical stores and ship a lot of home deliveries from their stores don’t rely as much on overwhelmed parcel companies. “That gives them an escape valve for shipageddon,” he said.

One silver lining in the potential holiday shopping drama is that it makes the invisible more visible. Just as the pandemic has made me appreciate the work of grocery clerks, health care workers, bus drivers, restaurant staffers and other sometimes overlooked people, it has also made plain the complexities of our shopping lives.

ADVERTISEMENT

Those mouse clicks on Amazon or Target have always set in motion a chaotic ballet of warehouse workers, truck drivers, parcel delivery couriers and more, but we mostly didn’t think about it. The shipping delays this year might reveal the strains at the seams, but they’ve always been there.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

YOUR LEAD

Ransomware is not your fault

After last week’s newsletter about “ransomware” attacks, in which criminals freeze organizations’ computer systems and demand a payment to unlock them, a number of readers asked about ways to prevent these hacks.

Ken Gruberman in Altadena, Calif., told us an orthopedics practice he used was locked out of its computer system for months because of a ransomware attack:

“The attack was enabled because a new employee clicked on a pop-up window which then allowed the thieves in … I learned that the IT staff at the practice never created simple guidelines for all employees on what to do when confronted with a bogus pop-up, message, web page or other anomaly.”

While I don’t know what happened at this practice, it’s true that ransomware attacks tend to start when someone in an organization clicks on an email attachment or web link that gives the criminals a route into the computer network.

But the security expert I spoke with, Charles Carmakal of FireEye Mandiant, said attacks should not be blamed on people who make a mistake. (Still, here are tips to avoid falling for hackers on your work account or your home computer.)

Just because criminals were able to trick their way into one person’s computer doesn’t mean they can take over the entire organization’s network. Hackers usually take days or weeks to get access to the right parts of an organization’s computer network for a ransomware attack, Carmakal said. That gives the organization many opportunities to spot and stop the criminals.

The key, Carmakal said, is for organizations to think and plan ahead for potential attacks and invest in technology that can help spot unusual computer activity. My colleague Brian X. Chen had useful advice for businesses in a 2017 column.

So, yes, Carmakal said, it’s important for workers to learn how to spot potential malicious emails or documents, but ransomware is never one person’s fault.

Before we go …

  • Facebook makes lots of rules. It’s harder to enforce them. Facebook acknowledged it erred when it didn’t delete a majority of the content flagged by The Wall Street Journal that violated the company’s guidelines against things like depicting violence and posting dangerous misinformation. Lots of people take issue with Facebook trying to limit online conversations — see this article from my colleagues — but the company also often fails to act quickly or make fine distinctions in deciding what material breaks its own rules.Related: The New York Times technology columnist Kevin Roose says that the blowback Facebook and Twitter are facing for limiting distribution of an unsubstantiated article about Joe Biden shows that “tech platforms have been controlling our information diets for years, whether we realized it or not.”
  • Here is something to make you feel guilty about your inbox: The best way to prevent overstuffed online email and document accounts that nag you to pay for more storage is to delete unwanted emails, photos, songs and digital files regularly, says a writer for Medium’s consumer technology publication. Here is how to do it. (Personally, I will wallow in my chaotic online file cabinets FOREVER.)
  • Have you seen the “How it started … How it’s going” meme? My colleague Sandra E. Garcia explains this internet phenomenon, which shows “the passage of time through oppositional bookends.” Also it is just dumb fun. This is my favorite version of the meme.

Hugs to this

Wilbur the pig can play soccer with his snout. Well, sort of.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you’d like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

2020年10月15日 星期四

On Tech: Ignore phone companies about 5G

The cellular networks might be life-changing in the future. Not today.

Ignore phone companies about 5G

James Marshall

There might not be smartphones in billions of pockets today if the phone companies had their way.

Now they’re again standing in the way of progress.

This week’s unveiling of new iPhone models started the typical selling season for smartphones. What’s different in 2020 is Americans are getting pitched hard on buying a new phone to get access to the next generation of cellular networks, known as 5G.

The message is: 5G = Good! Fast! Get it now!

Reality: It is not that good or that fast at the moment and most people in the United States don’t need to get it now.

Americans should be angry about marketing blather winning over clarity about 5G. I fear people will waste their money on half-baked technology and grow disillusioned by 5G’s potential to improve lives.

My message for U.S. phone companies: Communicate more effectively about 5G or go away.

I’ve seen these problems before. In the pre-iPhone age, we had years of clunky mobile devices, and phone providers like AT&T deserved a lot of the blame.

Phone companies dictated almost everything about flip phones and early smartphones, including their features, look and speed. People had to put up with crummy software from the phone company to surf the web or download songs and ringtones. (Remember ringtones?!) It stank.

ADVERTISEMENT

One of the secrets to the iPhone’s success is Apple simply said no to all of that. Apple’s chief executive at the time, Steve Jobs, gave wireless phone companies an ultimatum: Stay out of every decision about the iPhone or lose a shot at selling a potential blockbuster.

Apple got its way, the iPhone was eventually a success and phone companies got rich from it alongside Apple.

Phone companies did eventually play an important role in making smartphones affordable, useful and available across the globe. But a lesson from that crucial beginning was that phone companies needed to be taken down a peg before a new technology could catch on.

I’m getting bad 2000s vibes from what’s happening now with smartphones.

My colleague Brian X. Chen has written about 5G marketing hot air. This wireless standard should, in theory, allow us to download videos or buy stuff on our phones in a snap. At some point the fast wireless speeds might make it easier for cars without drivers to safely navigate city streets and for more surgeons to operate on patients remotely.

ADVERTISEMENT

But in the United States right now, 5G is not available in many places nor is it a significant improvement in zippinessif it’s faster at all — for most people. Phone companies are not being clear about that, mostly.

If you’ve decided to buy a new smartphone, it makes sense to buy one that works on 5G cell networks. Most Americans, however, should not buy a new phone just for 5G. (People in other countries: This may not apply to you.)

Given Apple’s history, I was disappointed that Apple this week echoed the confusion about 5G at its unveiling of new iPhones. Jobs’s successor, Tim Cook, let the boss of Verizon hype 5G. Cook said that 5G is “super fast.” It is! If you stand under just the right light pole on that one block in Chicago.

These 5G cellular networks will get better soon. I worry, though, that in the meantime Americans will grow cynical about the networks’ potential. And if they do, it will mostly be the phone companies’ fault.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

ADVERTISEMENT

How will the pandemic change food growing and shopping?

At a Times Talk event this week about how the pandemic is changing our food system, two topics came up that are tech relevant: A shift to grocery shopping online and the growth of vertical farms, highly mechanized and often tiny indoor produce labs close to population centers. (You can watch a replay of the event here.)

Greg Lehmkuhl of Lineage Logistics, which moves fresh and frozen food around the world, said he believed that many people who did more grocery shopping online during the pandemic will stick with that habit when the virus risk abates.

That means, Lehmkuhl said, that grocery sellers with the most money to invest in new food ordering systems and delivery methods — think Amazon, Walmart and other big box stores — will do better than retailers with fewer resources.

And he said that the changes in how Americans shop for groceries have prompted food sellers to make major adaptations, including setting up more mini-stores not for shopping but for assembling grocery orders for home delivery.

Sara Menker, the founder and chief executive of the agriculture software company Gro Intelligence, said that vertical farms were an efficient and less wasteful way of growing some produce like leafy greens, but they aren’t a viable alternative to traditional agriculture in many cases.

“There is only a subset of food that can still grow in a vertical farm,” Menker said. Vertical farms typically can’t grow staples like rice or corn, she said. And while prices have decreased as people get more adept at growing food in vertical farms, the farms are probably not viable everywhere.

“It will work in some markets, and in others it won’t because it will still be too expensive,” Menker said.

Before we go …

  • Take a breath. Be skeptical. Brian X. Chen has a helpful guide to how to spot — and hopefully not share — false or emotionally manipulative information we see online. Among the tips: Stick to a handful of news sources you trust and do some of your own fact-checking.Related: Following Facebook and Twitter, YouTube said it would take steps to block videos related to QAnon, the sprawling conspiracy theory community that espouses that child-eating cabals control powerful institutions, my colleague Kevin Roose reported.
  • A political allegation prompted pushback from social media companies: Facebook and Twitter limited access to a New York Post report based on unverified material about Joe Biden, my colleagues reported. The companies’ actions provoked strong reactions from Republicans, who accused the social media platforms of censoring them.
  • I have panic-purchased multiple computer cables for some reason: My colleague John Herrman writes that a brutal 2020 has made people gadget freaks — whether they meant to be or not. People have scoured the internet for scarce school laptops, noise canceling headphones, video game systems and (gulp) pulse oximeters to make it through difficult times.

Hugs to this

Truly, what day is it? No one knows. Even this TV news anchor.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you’d like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018