2020年12月4日 星期五

A long reading list for your weekend

Words to relax to, sort of.
Author Headshot

By Jamelle Bouie

Opinion Columnist

I was out of commission with a bad cold for most of this week, which meant I didn’t do much writing, but did do a lot of reading. And since I don’t want to leave you hanging, this week’s newsletter will have more links than usual to reflect that. As of this writing I am on the mend, and I look forward to sending you more of my own takes next week!

ADVERTISEMENT

Now Reading

Rachelle Hampton on how the radio host Charlamagne tha God became the go-to “voice” of Black America for politicians, in Slate magazine.

Samuel Goldman on the meaning of “liberty” in Law & Liberty.

Rich Yeselson on the future of union power in Dissent.

Eleanor Cummins on the sheer scale of the Covid-19 tragedy in The New Republic.

Ellen Wayland-Smith on Ron Howard’s adaptation of “Hillbilly Elegy” in the Boston Review.

Julia Gaffield on Atlantic slavery in Public Books.

Hannah Giorgis on the Washington, D.C., football team for The Atlantic.

Shirley Elizabeth Thompson on her Atlanta childhood in The New York Review of Books.

Kim Kelly on essential workers for The Baffler.

John Thomason on Hannah Arendt for Commonweal magazine.

ADVERTISEMENT

Feedback

If you’re enjoying what you’re reading, please consider recommending it to friends. They can sign up here. If you want to share your thoughts on an item in this week’s newsletter or on the newsletter in general, please email me at jamelle-newsletter@nytimes.com.

Photo of the Week

I took this with my iPhone at the Virginia Science Museum in Richmond. The museum used to be a train station and some of that infrastructure, as you can see here, remains. In the late-afternoon light, the passageways and sky and grass and concrete create a compelling mix of tones and angles that translates very well to black-and-white.

ADVERTISEMENT

Now Eating: Pasta e Ceci

I don’t have any comments about this recipe (from NYT Cooking) other than it’s good! If you eat animal products, be sure to use a good chicken stock; if you don’t, cook dried chickpeas with aromatics and a lot of water, and use the leftover broth as the base for your soup. I added a cup or so of diced carrot and extra chopped garlic. I recommend you do the same.

Ingredients

  • 3 tablespoons olive oil, plus more for drizzling
  • 1 medium yellow onion, finely chopped
  • 3 garlic cloves, finely chopped
  • 2 teaspoons chopped fresh rosemary
  • ½ teaspoon red-pepper flakes
  • Kosher salt and black pepper
  • 1 packed cup canned whole tomatoes, drained
  • 1 (15-ounce) can chickpeas, rinsed
  • 1 cup ditalini pasta
  • 4 cups roughly chopped escarole, Tuscan kale or radicchio
  • Grated pecorino, for serving

Directions

Heat the oil in a large stockpot or Dutch oven over medium. Add the onion and cook, stirring occasionally, until softened but not taking on any color, 4 to 5 minutes. Add the garlic, rosemary and red-pepper flakes, and cook 1 minute more. Season well with salt and pepper.

Stir in the tomatoes and the chickpeas, breaking up the tomatoes with the back of a spoon or spatula and smashing about ½ cup of the beans.

Add 3 cups water and bring to a boil over high. Add the pasta and simmer, stirring often to make sure nothing sticks to the bottom of the pan, until the pasta is al dente, about 10 minutes. The water will mostly be absorbed by the pasta, but if you prefer it brothier, you can add ½ to 1 cup water and simmer until warmed through, 1 minute more. Season to taste with salt and pepper.

Add the escarole and stir until wilted. Taste and adjust seasonings accordingly. Ladle into bowls and top with grated cheese and a drizzle of olive oil.

IN THE TIMES

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Jamelle Bouie from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/

On Tech: Why ‘Wonder Woman’ at home matters

The Netflix model is winning, and the entertainment industry may be changed forever.

Why ‘Wonder Woman’ at home matters

Bernice Liu

If this is the moment when entertainment changes forever, it won’t only be because streaming won. It will also be because total control is irresistible.

Warner Bros., the Hollywood powerhouse whose films include the “Wonder Woman” and “Harry Potter” series and “Casablanca,” said on Thursday that all of its new films in 2021 would come out at the same time in movie theaters and on its sibling streaming service, HBO Max, my colleagues Brooks Barnes and Nicole Sperling wrote.

Before now, some new movies in the United States have been available for us to watch at home on the day they debuted in theaters. But never at this scale.

Warner Bros. said that its movies-plus-streaming approach was a temporary measure while the pandemic made some people wary of movie theaters. But don’t be fooled. It will be almost impossible to go back to the old ways of doing things, as Brooks and Nicole wrote.

You and your binges of “The Great British Baking Show” know why. “This is about turning HBO Max into a Netflix,” Brooks told me.

Conventional entertainment companies like AT&T, which owns Warner Bros., Walt Disney and basically anyone who ever made a TV show are trying to become Netflix, and fast. (The media writer Peter Kafka of Recode, who has said another factor of Warner Bros.’ online film releases was the weaknesses of movie theater chains, wrote about the urge to catch up to Netflix several weeks ago.)

ADVERTISEMENT

But it’s also important to understand an underappreciated motivation behind the Netflix envy. This isn’t only about streaming beating cable television companies and movie theaters. The Netflix model represents a complete reordering of entertainment into self-contained empires that control as much as possible from the first frame of a film shoot to the last pixel of a movie you watch on your phone.

The old model of entertainment involves constant handoffs of control. A company that makes a movie relies on a cineplex to release it and then turns over its product again to video rental stores (remember them?), movie download services, TV channels and other outsiders to make sure it gets seen.

This new approach dispenses with a bunch of that. Instead, Netflix tries to control almost everything from beginning to end. It’s not there yet, and AT&T isn’t going that far with HBO Max — yet — but that’s the direction everyone is headed.

It’s as if Ford aspired to make every part that went into its cars, assemble the vehicles and sell them instead of buying parts from a bunch of different suppliers and going through car dealerships.

ADVERTISEMENT

There has been almost nothing like this before, and that’s why this reordering of the entertainment industry is different from the history of big changes that has made Hollywood predict its own demise many times before.

To be frank, I don’t know if the self-contained empire model that Netflix inspired will last. Even Netflix has to constantly borrow money because it typically spends more cash each year than it takes in from our subscriptions. But as every major company in entertainment tries to control its own destiny, don’t underestimate how big a deal this is.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Google is not a normal workplace

A well-respected Google researcher, Timnit Gebru, said she was fired by the company after criticizing its approach to minority hiring and the biases built into artificial intelligence systems, my colleagues Cade Metz and Daisuke Wakabayashi reported.

ADVERTISEMENT

(You can read here the email that Dr. Gebru wrote to a group including Google employees, and one that Jeff Dean, who oversees Google’s A.I. work, wrote to the company.)

We’re seeing clashes between technology company workers and their employers spill out into the open more and more, over issues including workplace safety, diversity and the ethics of technology.

This is probably not because Google, Facebook or Amazon have more disagreements between management and workers than a restaurant chain or an accounting firm. It’s that Big Tech companies are not ordinary employers. The outside world pays more attention to what they do, and we should.

These gigantic companies set trends for everything from how offices are designed to what workers are paid, and they should be held to a higher standard. The companies often say they want the extra attention and deserve it, but I’m not sure they mean it.

When Dai wrote an article in 2017 about an analysis that found that Google paid male employees more than women at most job levels, the company’s head of human resources at the time told him: “I do believe Google, because of its size and perhaps our size or our prominence in people’s everyday lives, I think we’re in the spotlight. It feels a little unfair.”

I have not forgotten this quote. I think this executive was expressing out loud something that most of her peers believe but keep to themselves. She was right that Google is in the spotlight. She was wrong that it’s unfair.

Google’s parent company has a stock market value nearly equivalent to the gross domestic product of Spain. It is therefore completely fair for it to get the same attention as a large country.

Before we go …

  • Speaking of a spotlight on Big Tech workplaces: The federal government sued Facebook, accusing it of being un-American by favoring foreign workers with visas over those from the United States, my colleagues Cecilia Kang and Mike Isaac wrote. This lawsuit, they said, shows that Big Tech companies are not in the good graces of American politicians of either major party.
  • Can small nudges make the internet nicer? YouTube said it would start popping up reminders to people before they post potentially offensive comments on videos, Axios reported. Many popular internet services have tried methods like this to encourage people to think twice before they post something they might regret or share inaccurate information. There’s mixed evidence on whether it’s working.
  • We love stores — to return stuff we bought online: Recode wrote about why Amazon and other e-commerce sellers are offering more options for people to return merchandise in person, often in physical stores that compete with e-commerce merchants.

Hugs to this

A couple in Australia returned home after an outing and found this koala clinging to their plastic Christmas tree. The koala was VERY GRUMPY about being pulled from its perch by wildlife rescuers, but she was relocated to a real tree outside.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you’d like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/