2020年12月16日 星期三

On Tech: Vaccines need effective messengers

How health care professionals and internet companies can help in the fight against misinformation.

Vaccines need effective messengers

Brandon Blommaert

Getting the science right is only one element of having coronavirus vaccines be successful. People must also trust them, and that requires an effective communications mobilization.

My colleague Davey Alba co-wrote an article on Tuesday about a recent increase in misleading claims about vaccines for the coronavirus. She spoke with me about the challenge for health professionals and others to spread the message about vaccines’ effectiveness and safety and the role of internet companies in slowing misleading information.

Shira: You can’t blame people for being cautious about new vaccines to prevent a virus that scientists don’t completely understand yet.

Davey: Absolutely not. I want to distinguish between misinformation narratives and the understandable caution that we all have about new vaccines.

Here’s an example. Regulators are keeping tabs on whether the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine causes an adverse health reaction in people who have a history of a specific type of severe allergic reaction. The misinformation narratives capitalize on that to spread the concern that allergic reactions from the vaccines are widespread, which isn’t true.

(New York Times journalists have answers to people’s common questions about coronavirus vaccines.)

There’s a history of Black Americans being mistreated or abused in health care. Is that legacy showing up in misinformation about the pandemic or vaccines?

ADVERTISEMENT

Past misinformation campaigns have tried to capitalize on people’s existing fears or divisions. In 2016, for example, Russian disinformation targeted Black Americans and immigrant groups because they believed it was an effective tactic to try to widen existing social divisions. I’ve seen some early signs that people might try to exploit vaccine hesitancy among Black Americans.

How much blame do the internet companies deserve for the spread of misleading information about vaccines?

This year internet companies have seemed willing to be more aggressive to combat urgent risks of misleading information. Facebook and YouTube have said they will remove content about coronavirus vaccines that have been debunked by public health experts, and Twitter says it’s working on its own policy.

But writing policies is one thing. Whether they are effective and how the companies enforce their policies are another.

ADVERTISEMENT

Once misleading information starts to spread widely — as we saw with false claims of voter fraud in the recent U.S. election — it’s a Band-Aid for internet companies to take action after the fact. Companies also often enforce their own rules unevenly, and some people take advantage of loopholes.

The fundamental problem is that the internet platforms depend on maximizing people’s attention. And false information is effective at getting people’s attention.

The misinformation researcher Renée DiResta wrote that health care officials haven’t done enough to make reliable health information compelling and understandable. Are any health professionals or government officials trying to fix that?

I’m grateful to the health professionals who take the time to communicate with people about the coronavirus and vaccines in ways that are clear. News organizations have a role to play in this, too, by making health messages accessible and relatable.

ADVERTISEMENT

(Here’s Shira’s interview with a doctor who makes popular TikTok videos to teach people about the coronavirus and vaccines.)

In the pre-internet days, people absorbed important information mostly from friends and family, others they interacted with personally and traditional news outlets. Would we be better informed about coronavirus vaccines in a hypothetical world without the internet?

I don’t know. The wealth of information that’s available now — both good and bad — does place more of a burden on us to be more careful consumers of information.

It also makes it more important for researchers, science and health professionals, journalists and others to dream up ways to effectively communicate information so people aren’t out there all on their own trying to understand what’s happening.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Failure isn’t all bad

I’m going to give Periscope, an app you’ve probably never used, a moment in the (newsletter) sun.

Periscope was among the first breakout apps to give anyone the option to easily broadcast whatever they wanted to the world in real time. Twitter, which bought the app in 2015, said on Tuesday that Periscope would be unplugged by March.

Periscope has been on death’s door for awhile, partly because most of us don’t want to post live videos of whatever is happening. But its influence lives on, because live video is everywhere. If you have in this pandemic year hung out on Zoom, strummed along to real-time guitar lessons on Instagram or interacted with sexual performers live on websites like OnlyFans, then Periscope deserves a little credit.

My big question is not why some ideas like Periscope fail, but why relatively similar ideas have widely different outcomes.

Why did Periscope wither, but Twitch built a thriving community of people livestreaming themselves playing video games or just sitting around talking? Why did live video not really catch on for Facebook — though the company tried hard — but it has for Facebook-owned Instagram?

(On a side note, live video remains a feature I feel conflicted about, because of the real and hard-to-control danger of people posting live videos of horrible things.)

There will be post-mortems about what went wrong for Periscope, and surely Twitter deserves at least some of the blame. Twitter is notorious for taking a fresh concept and ruining it by failing to invest in it, neglecting to make feature changes or making other management bungles.

But accurately diagnosing failure or success is not easy. There’s some magic alchemy of a good idea, good execution and good luck for why some products live on and others don’t. And sometimes, as with Periscope, failure is not the end of the story.

Before we go …

  • We haven’t heard the last of the massive cyberattack: My colleague David E. Sanger explained on “The Daily” what was behind the computer attack that hit multiple U.S. government agencies, and why this keeps happening.
  • Technology is not the answer, example infinity: The Markup selected the worst algorithms of 2020. The losers include data-based systems that influence who receives important medical treatments, a police department’s misuse of facial recognition technology to wrongly arrest a man in Detroit and educators who used software to assign grades.
  • But sometimes people can use tech for good: This is a remarkable tale of Ben Gardiner, who harnessed the early internet to help people share information about AIDS, find support and organize to change government policies. “His legacy lives on in anyone who now takes to the internet in good faith to deliver information and support to the suffering,” OneZero wrote.

Hugs to this

“I do my hair toss, check my nails …” Boston Medical Center staff members danced to celebrate distributing the first batch of coronavirus vaccines to their colleagues. (I definitely chair danced to Lizzo as I typed this.)

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you’d like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Smells Like Tween Armpit

How to reach the nirvana of a hygienic teenager.

Smells Like Tween Armpit

Kati Szilagyi

As stay-at-home orders return and each day seems to blend into the next, I’m hearing from colleagues and readers alike that their older kids are resisting shower time. While the littler ones can get by with a full bath once or twice a week, unless they’ve decided to make mud pies, the older ones get … let’s say, fragrant. If you’re nestled up beside them doing online learning, that makes for a distinctly unpleasant familial experience.

It’s not unusual for children this age to resist bathing, even when there’s not a pandemic going on. Tweens have control over their own bodies, said Dr. Nia Heard-Garris, a pediatrician and a researcher in the pediatrics department at Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, and not showering may be a way to assert their independence. “Just like you can’t force a 3-year-old to eat all the peas on their plate, you can’t force a 9- or 10-year-old to shower,” she said.

Indeed, I recall that during my first year of sleep-away camp when I was in late elementary school, an entire bunk of boys my age refused to bathe for our entire four-week stay, and they were extremely pleased with themselves. “It’s not new with the pandemic, but it is exaggerated,” said Tori Cordiano, a clinical psychologist in private practice based in Ohio who specializes in children and adolescents.

That’s because kids are out of their normal routines, and if they’re doing remote school, they’re not getting feedback from their peers. “The first time a friend says to them, ‘You have B.O.’ or ‘Your hair looks terrible,’ that would be the feedback to get them to change their ways,” said Dr. Elizabeth M. Alderman, chief of the division of adolescent medicine at The Children’s Hospital at Montefiore in New York. “Because of Covid, they don’t really have that.” Body odor is the first sign of puberty in about 20 percent of children, Dr. Alderman said, and typically happens earlier for girls than it does for boys.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tweens and teens may also feel like showering is “the one thing in a totally chaotic, messed up year I can control,” Dr. Heard-Garris said. While we can all be sympathetic to the desire to regain some semblance of power, we also have to live with these smelly little creatures. So here are some ways to encourage your shower-resistant kid to bathe.

Ask them why. The first step is to have a conversation with your kid about why they don’t want to shower. Do not have this conversation at 8:30 p.m., when you’re nagging them to wash up before bed, Dr. Cordiano said. You want to have the chat when things are calmer and the stakes feel a little lower. “Enter with curiosity,” she said, “If we can enter into it neutrally, and take it in nonjudgmentally, and reach for empathy, it makes for a smoother collaboration.”

Their reasons for not wanting to bathe may be something you can fix easily: Maybe they’d prefer to shower in the morning and you’re asking them to shower at night, or maybe they hate the shampoo you bought. “You can cooperate with the kid,” Dr. Heard-Garris said. “You don’t have to punish or berate them. You can work on solving it together.”

Frame hygiene positively: Taking good care of yourself is part of being a bigger kid, Dr. Cordiano said. You won’t feel your best unless you get exercise, eat good food and, yes, take a shower. Dr. Alderman emphasized the importance of maintaining routines during the pandemic. It’s especially important as we enter these dark winter months that we keep up a routine for our mental health and model those behaviors for our kids, which means getting dressed every day, having regular meals and bathing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Set up smooth transitions. One reason for not bathing may be difficulty switching gears, Dr. Heard-Garris said. If you have a child who has problems going from one activity to another, visual cues such as a timer or a written-out schedule can help, she said.

Offer other sources of guidance. Sometimes kids just don’t want to listen to advice from their parents. Dr. Cordiano suggested giving your kid books explaining early puberty and hygiene like “The Care and Keeping of You: The Body Book for Younger Girls” and “Guy Stuff: The Body Book for Boys.” These choices are “grounded in science and really practical and accessible for kids, and a good jumping off point,” she said.

Try a compromise. If your child is still resistant, try to come up with a compromise. While there’s usually no medical reason that kids need to bathe a certain number of times a week, figure out the bare minimum you can live with. Dr. Heard-Garris suggested cleaning underarms and privates every day, and taking a full bath or shower three times a week.

Look for red flags. All three experts I consulted said that not bathing could potentially be a sign of depression — something we should particularly be on the lookout for during this difficult time. If this is a new behavior for your child, and you’re seeing other concerning changes in your kid, get in touch with your pediatrician as soon as possible.

ADVERTISEMENT

P.S. Follow us on Instagram @NYTParenting. If this was forwarded to you, sign up for the NYT Parenting newsletter here.

Want More on Hygiene?

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let’s celebrate the tiny victories.

My toddler screams and writhes every time I take him out of the beloved bath. Last night we stood next to the tub and said, “Goodbye bath!” for about five minutes and then he walked happily out of the bathroom. — Elizabeth Cowie, New York City

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for NYT Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018