2020年12月18日 星期五

What a new map tells us about the election

As a former Illinois state senator once said, there's no such thing as red states or blue states.
Author Headshot

By Jamelle Bouie

Opinion Columnist

A quick note: Starting with the next edition, the newsletter will come to you every Saturday. This is also the last newsletter of the year. I’ll be back in 2021!

I am a big fan of maps, and the best I’ve seen this year comes from Randall Munroe of the web comic “XKCD.” It is a map of the 2020 presidential election results, but not the traditional blue/red Electoral College map, nor is it a county-level map of the United States or even a map that weights the size of each state by its population. Instead, it simply shows where the votes were.

A map of the 2020 presidential election.Randall Munroe

The goal of the map, Munroe says, is to show where voters are. “My map isn’t great for telling at a glance who won a given state,” he explained on Twitter, but it will help answer a “basic question like ‘Where do most Trump voters in Illinois live?’” To that end, each red or blue figure on the map represents 250,000 votes, and they are placed in a way to show where each cluster is located within each state. There are obviously some voters in the white space of the map, but they are few and far between.

I think this way of representing votes makes Munroe’s map still infinitely more useful than the typical election-result map. First of all, it illustrates the basic truth that few people live in the interior of the country, something even the most detailed red/blue maps tend to obscure.

ADVERTISEMENT

Second of all, Munroe’s illustration of the results shows how talk of secession — of “red states” and “blue states” going their separate ways — is deeply misguided. Every state, every city, every county, every community has Trump voters and Biden voters. Even in my strongly pro-Biden enclave of Charlottesville, Va., thousands of my neighbors voted for President Trump. As Munroe says, ”You can be a Biden voter in a Trump household in a Biden precinct in a Trump county in a Biden district in a Trump state in a Biden country.” Traditional maps leave the false (and dangerous) impression that we are a nation of rival, sorted, easily definable camps. In truth, however, the political geography of the United States is layered, and there’s no easy way to divide the country into partisan camps.

Like many on the left, I think the Republican Party and its voters have turned a blind eye to truly unconscionable behavior by President Trump. After he was elected, I wrote that his supporters would bear some responsibility for the eruption of racism and bigotry that would come and that it was wrong to solicit sympathy on their behalf simply because they disliked the names and labels that came with supporting a racist demagogue.

The thing is, those people aren’t going away (the reverse is also true, for those conservatives who feel similarly about left-leaning Americans). There will be no split. As Munroe’s map shows, we are bound to each other, whether we like it or not. The challenge for the next decade, then, is how do we live together, and more important, how do we govern when even living together is such a challenge?

What I Wrote

It took six weeks for key Senate Republicans to acknowledge reality and congratulate Joe Biden and Kamala Harris on their win. I wrote about what that might mean for the immediate future of American democracy.

ADVERTISEMENT

To affirm Joe Biden and Kamala Harris as the winners of the election more than a month after the end of voting — as Mitch McConnell did, on Tuesday morning, when he announced that “our country officially has a president-elect and vice-president elect” — is to treat the outcome as unofficial pending an attempt to overturn the result. In short, Republicans are establishing a new normal for the conduct of elections, one in which a Democratic victory is suspect until proven otherwise, and where Republicans have a “constitutional right” to challenge the vote in hopes of having it thrown out.

Now Reading

Frank Guan on Rage Against the Machine for New York magazine.

McKay Coppins on Mormonism for The Atlantic.

Alissa Wilkinson on the best films of 2020 for Vox.

Tommy Craggs on the unavoidable reality of cultural politics for Mother Jones.

Noreen Malone on how the debate on school reopening has torn one liberal community apart, in Slate magazine.

ADVERTISEMENT

Feedback
If you’re enjoying what you’re reading, please consider recommending it to your friends. They can sign up here. If you want to share your thoughts on an item in this week’s newsletter or on the newsletter in general, please email me at jamelle-newsletter@nytimes.com.

Photo of the Week

Kristen Finn

Since this is the last newsletter of 2020, I will leave you with a photo of the family, taken over the summer as part of a “porch portrait” project by a few local photographers. It’s been a difficult year, and we hope that you’ve weathered it as best as possible. Here’s to a happy holiday and a much-improved new year.

Now Eating: Slow-Simmered Field Peas

Like every born-and-bred Southerner, I have a bowl of black-eyed peas and collard greens (with cornbread) to start the new year. This, from Steven Satterfield’s “Root to Leaf,” is my base recipe for the peas. In the likely event you cannot get fresh-shelled field peas, dried black-eyed peas are fine. Just be sure to soak them overnight to speed up cooking. If you’re something of a culinary traditionalist, you could use Sea Island red peas instead of black-eyed peas. Satterfield’s recipe calls for onion, celery and fennel; I like to add a diced jalapeño. And instead of ham or smoked ham hock, I use smoked turkey necks.

Ingredients

  • 4 cups fresh shelled field peas such as black-eyed peas, crowder peas or lady peas
  • 3 tablespoons extra virgin olive oil
  • ½ cup finely diced yellow onion
  • ½ cup finely diced celery
  • ½ cup finely diced fennel bulb
  • kosher salt
  • freshly ground black pepper
  • 1 thick slice country ham or 1 small piece of smoked ham hock
  • 1 spring fresh thyme

Directions

If using fresh peas, place in large pot, cover with water, and agitate them gently. Pull them out in small handfuls and check for blemishes or debris. Set the washed peas aside. If using dried peas, soak for 8 hours, drain and rinse when ready to use.

In a large saucepan or Dutch oven, heat the oil over medium heat. Add the onion, celery and fennel; season with a little salt and pepper; and sauté until translucent, about 5 minutes. Add the ham (or turkey neck), peas and thyme, and then add water (or chicken stock, preferably homemade) to cover by 1 inch. Simmer on low heat until the peas are tender, skimming all the while, 45 to 60 minutes.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Jamelle Bouie from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

On Tech: Big Tech should try radical candor

As the power of tech giants grows, the companies should do more to explain how they work.

Big Tech should try radical candor

Jinhwa Oh

This is the last edition of On Tech for 2020. Thank you for reading, please be well and I’ll see you back here on Jan. 4.

A large part of my job is explaining the inner workings of big and powerful tech companies. I want them to put me out of a job.

OK, not really. My rhetorical point is that by design, mortals don’t really understand the complex, sometimes garbage-prone sea of independent merchants selling on Amazon. Few of us comprehend the full measure of data collected by Google and Facebook. People may not get why their iPhones keep pushing them to Apple Music.

Knowing the messy details often isn’t essential. I don’t understand internal combustion engines, and I still drive.

But as Big Tech superpowers command more of our attention and money and shape how the world operates, it would be beneficial to us and the companies for them to be better understood. And that may mean acknowledging uncomfortable truths.

When I looked this week at the new nutrition-label-like descriptions that Apple now requires about the data that apps collect, happy jolts fired in my brain. The labels try to communicate in plain language something that is murky — how apps track us and for what — and put that information in a prominent place.

ADVERTISEMENT

Facebook complained about the labels and a similar Apple feature that’s intended to give iPhone owners the choice of whether companies can track them across different apps and websites.

Facebook said that these disclosures would hurt businesses that buy ads based on data that Facebook collects. It’s probably right, but that’s not the full truth. The company is more likely worried that if people grasp all the data that it collects, they might panic and not use Facebook’s apps.

I’m not sympathetic. But I would be happier if Facebook tried frank talk instead. It could explain, in detail, the trade that Facebook (and Google) are essentially asking us to make.

We use their apps and probably get cheaper picture-framing services or hotel rooms because Google and Facebook give businesses affordable ways to pinpoint the most receptive customers. And to do this, the companies record every hamburger we’ve eaten since 2002.

ADVERTISEMENT

People do understand the generalities of this trade. But Facebook’s freak out about Apple shows that it doesn’t believe we’re really making an informed bargain.

Well, let’s have that honest conversation. Let’s hear more about these companies’ products, their business models and their corporate practices.

What if Amazon engaged head-on with the criticisms that it’s creating bad jobs? What if Apple justified why it complies with government rules in China that it wouldn’t accept in the United States? Not in rosy P.R. speak but in real and repeated talk in their marketing, on their websites and in other prominent spots.

Google did on Thursday fairly frankly say that it squashed competitors as it changed web search displays but that it gave us better information. Google did not say that sometimes those changes have made searching worse for us AND it squashed competitors. It was a candid half truth, so … half credit?

ADVERTISEMENT

I bet you’re asking why any company would illuminate its own dark corners. My answer is: to keep people’s trust.

Americans tend to express low confidence in large institutions — particularly U.S. lawmakers and news outlets, but big tech companies are approaching a similar range, according to a recent Gallup survey.

A loss of public confidence may be inevitable for anyone with power, and maybe people wouldn’t like giant tech companies even if they understood them. But faith in Big Tech is likely to further erode with more ugly headlines and government lawsuits.

So why not try winning confidence with radical candor? It would feel refreshing, even if truth telling by powerful tech companies makes my job obsolete.

Because of a Gmail outage, a number of you may not have received On Tech several days this week. We apologize. If you’d like to catch up with anything you missed, click here for all the On Tech editions online.

TikTok shopping with Walmart

I’ve written before about predictions that the QVC-like shopping webcasts that are big in China are going to hit it big elsewhere.

I’m still not sure.

Walmart and TikTok are going to try. On Friday, Walmart will host a one-hour live webcast on TikTok, during which some popular TikTok creators will show off clothing from Walmart. People can buy the merchandise without leaving the app.

I am very curious to see how TikTok’s first U.S. fashion webcast works. What else am I going to do on a Friday night in 2020?

(Yes, this is the same TikTok the U.S. government said it would block from the country. Then President Trump negotiated a sale out loud between the app’s owner and an odd collection of American companies including Walmart. And since then … the deal has gone nowhere.)

Anyway, Walmart. I swear I have heard people tout click-to-buy shopping in entertainment programming for 15 years — first on entertainment television like daytime talk shows, then on the desktop web and now in apps like Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok.

Even though live entertainment mixed with social media and shopping is huge in China, I’m simply not sure that Americans’ habits and the country’s digital payments systems provide a fertile ground for this phenomenon to catch on here.

If you watched your favorite TikTok star do a dance-off to pitch her line of leggings, would you want the leggings enough to spend 10 minutes typing your credit card number into a tiny box in the TikTok app?

I am prepared to be wrong about livestream shopping. Popular online stars including those on TikTok and YouTube are adept at persuading their fans to buy their merchandise from established online stores. It makes intuitive sense that they would be able to do so in live video shows or something similar. And some people will probably use digital payments or saved credit card options in the app to make shopping easier.

But still, I have my doubts. We’ll have to watch and see.

Before we go …

  • Good gracious, the hack keeps getting worse: My colleagues David E. Sanger and Nicole Perlroth reported that a computer attack by hackers believed to be working for the Kremlin struck more U.S. government agencies and companies — and was far more complex — than investigators initially believed.
  • Good games, a bad game and “Grinch bots”: Here are video games that my colleagues played incessantly this year. Cyberpunk 2077, a much-awaited game, was so glitchy that Sony removed it from its PlayStation store. These people are trying to make video gaming more inclusive and accessible. And some people are deploying automated software, or “Grinch bots,” to skip ahead of online lines for the latest PlayStation console.
  • A saga for a shower curtain: After I wrote this week about the exhausting complexity of online shopping, an On Tech reader, Polly Tita, recounted her simple task gone awry. First, Polly ordered and received a shower curtain that turned out to be too small for a conventional shower. A replacement ordered for pickup from a hardware store turned out not to be in stock. Finally success came from ordering from a different hardware store. “Lots more time spent researching and ordering for this small purchase than our computer or TV,” wrote Polly, who lives in Berwyn, Ill.

Hugs to this

Let’s watch a hamster navigate an elaborate maze to escape from zombies. We are the hamster, and 2020 is the zombies. (Good news: The hamster wins.)

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you’d like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018