2021年1月27日 星期三

College Costs Are Less Terrifying Than You Think

You probably won't pay the sticker price, and you can start saving now.

College Costs Are Less Terrifying Than You Think

Author Headshot

By Ron Lieber

Your Money Columnist, Business

Ana Galvañ

With everything else going on in the world, the last thing I want to think about is my kids' college education. Even before the pandemic, paying for college was a downright terrifying prospect, best ignored except during the wee panic hours of the morning.

This week, I'm handing over the newsletter to Ron Lieber, the "Your Money" columnist at The Times, who has a new book out called "The Price You Pay for College," to help talk me and everyone else down from our fears for the future.

—Jessica Grose

Most of us become parents with the hope that our kids will do better and achieve more than we have — or at least be happier. The right kind of higher education can help. But then, at some point, we contemplate saving and paying for it.

If fear is one of the elemental feelings of parenting — first, that we will hurt them and then, as they get older, that they will hurt themselves — fear of the college bill is often the largest looming financial one.

Ever notice how the Department of Agriculture conveniently leaves higher education costs out of its $284,570 estimate of the expense of raising a child? Even as the federal government also has great expectations that it bakes into its unrealistic financial aid formulas about what we'll be able to afford to pay for college?

I noticed. I did when the cost of some state schools crossed the $100,000 barrier for four years and the most expensive private colleges started to top $300,000. But that is not what most people pay. So, a few facts to tamp down the feelings.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to the College Board, the net tuition (after various aid and discounts) and fees that first-time, full-time undergraduates paid this school year was $3,230 at public colleges and universities and $15,990 at private ones. That does not include room, board, travel and books.

How much might it be in 10 years? The experts have proven to be very bad at projecting it, but you can use your own estimates via Vanguard's college calculator.

So that's a far cry from the retail price of $300,000-plus at many private universities. But still, the cost of tuition, room, board and fees today at a public university can easily hit $100,000 if you're at a more expensive school. How best to ease your mind?

A plan helps. I like the one that Kevin McKinley, a financial planner in Eau Claire, Wisc., shared with me years ago — save a fraction, spend a fraction during the college years out of your current income (and eat a lot of rice and beans or skip vacations then) and then borrow some (half in the teen's name, half in yours).

ADVERTISEMENT

Also, have a talk with your parents if they are in the picture. There are so many ways they can help, especially if they can see you are trying to ease your own fear, and not attempting to grab an early inheritance. They probably want you to worry less.

I know this doesn't necessarily solve the more overarching, existential dread. And you are not alone in your concern about your kids' future. The last time the Pew Research Center asked, in 2019, 60 percent of Americans believed that children would do worse financially than their parents had.

However you define "worse," we have a lot more data than we used to on recent trend lines. If parenting is at least in part about prudent risk management, it pays to take a quick look at the actuarial data. Some of the best resides with the researchers at Opportunity Insights, a nonprofit at Harvard. People born in 1940 had over a 90 percent chance of having a household income greater than their parents by age 30. Babies born in the early 1960s saw the likelihood fall below 60 percent. But by the early 1980s, we were close to 50-50.

So it's a coin flip, given that we can't exactly project the trajectory of any given elementary school kid on a piece of blue-lined graph paper.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is uncomfortable for many parents. We don't have many established narratives for downward mobility in America, and none of us want our children to be protagonists in that genre, either.

And perhaps what you really want is to spend more on your kids— the most you possibly can. Many parents do, at least for some things along the way. Nobody should feel shame for wondering whether the most prestigious, expensive version of anything for their kids is the safest choice given our frightening national circumstances at present.

And if you're scared that you won't be able to do that, or anything close to it? One of my favorite parental fear-mitigation tactics is to stare for a couple minutes at a drawing that Carl Richards, the former Sketch Guy columnist for The New York Times, drew years ago. There are two circles representing things that matter and things you can control. And the small area where they overlap? That's what you should focus on.

So first, to flush the things we can't control out of our minds. We don't know where our kids will win admission to college, and no amount of feeding and watering (and spending) will guarantee anything. We can't be sure about who might discriminate against them and for what. We also can't predict what kind of discounts colleges may offer, whether based on financial need or a child's academic or other performance.

But there are things we can control and that matter plenty. One is what we save and are willing to borrow for college. Another is what we learn about the process.

We can start early, years ahead of time, to study up on how need-based financial aid works and how merit aid has changed the financial aid game entirely. I recommend Kalman Chany's book "Paying for College" to learn about need-based aid, along with the Paying for College 101 Facebook group for merit aid, which has no connection to Mr. Chany.

Finally, we can remember that doing better than one's parents may not be the metric that matters to today's children. We of course want our children to be able to meet their basic needs without working themselves to the bone. But beyond that, what will any particular household income figure mean in an unknowable world, with a spouse (or not) or kids or both or maybe neither?

Do enough of that sort of emotional resetting, and something like the opposite of fear can set in. Not outright confidence, perhaps, but the calm that comes from knowing that our kids may not need what we have to be happy themselves. And then, finally, comes hope that whatever that is, wherever they learn, will be enough for them.

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let's celebrate the tiny victories.

Today my 3-year-old daughter pretended to be a hotel owner. She had so much fun scrubbing my entire kitchen with Murphy's Oil Soap. For the first time in a year my kitchen is sparkling. The best part? She wants to clean it again tomorrow! — Bianca DeValeria, Weaverville, Calif.

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for NYT Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/

2021年1月26日 星期二

On Tech: What is a blockchain? Is it hype?

A technology based on a decentralized network may offer more control over what people do online.

What is a blockchain? Is it hype?

Timo Lenzen

Maybe you've read about the blockchain and don't get the fuss. (I am sheepishly raising my hand.) Maybe you've never heard of it.

My colleague Nathaniel Popper will explain what you need to know and separate the blockchain hope from the hype.

Nathaniel spoke to me about why some technologists can't shut up about the blockchain and, in researching his latest article, what he found about how it might — or might not! — help people remodel the internet with less control by giants like Google and Facebook.

Shira: I need this explained to me repeatedly. What is the blockchain? And how is it different from Bitcoin?

Nathaniel: The blockchain in the simplest terms is a ledger — a method of record keeping — that was invented for Bitcoin, which is a cryptocurrency. Unlike conventional records kept by one bank or accountant, the blockchain ledger uses a bunch of computers that each add new entries visible to everyone.

The blockchain design that Bitcoin inspired has been adapted for other kinds of records. The underlying principle is there is no central authority controlling a single ledger. Everyone who is part of the system controls a decentralized and shared record.

What's an example of how this might work?

A normal currency exchange might take your money, hold it and also hold the currency you buy. If it gets hacked, you could lose your money. With decentralized financial exchange based on the blockchain design, like what Bitcoin uses, you don't have to trust an authority with your money. Two people are automatically matched up through software, and they make the exchange directly with one another.

Blockchains sound pie-in-the-sky.

That's what I believed for a long time. But these blockchain ideas are shifting from concepts to living — though still clunky — experiments.

ADVERTISEMENT

On social networks like LBRY and Minds, people can see for themselves how it's different from YouTube or Facebook. The concept is that no company is in control or can delete your account. Each user can see that a posted video or other material wasn't altered by anyone else.

Whether you agree or disagree with Twitter for kicking out Donald Trump's account after the attack on the Capitol, it's an interesting idea that under a blockchain-based design, he might have been able to take his more than 80 million Twitter followers to another social network instead of losing them all.

It's going to be awhile before people can assess whether these blockchain applications really do what they propose and are an improvement over the status quo. Bitcoin has been around for a while and smart people still disagree about whether it's useful.

There are always downsides. What are they for the blockchain?

One big downside is that central authorities are efficient at building reliable software and fixing it when things break. With a decentralized network of computers and programmers, there's no boss to say that this flaw must be fixed in 20 minutes.

ADVERTISEMENT

And when there's a centralized system in finance or social networks, a government or another authority can stop terrorists or other criminals from using it. With blockchain-based designs, it's harder to exercise control.

Why is there such fanatic devotion to Bitcoin and blockchains?

Bitcoin is like a social movement. The people using the system feel like they're in charge because in essence they're making the system run. That's true for blockchain designs, too. They make people feel empowered in a way they aren't with conventional software.

Bitcoin started with a lofty idea to democratize money. But now it's like Beanie Babies — a thing people buy to make money. Will the blockchain concept also degrade into something less pure?

ADVERTISEMENT

It's true, many people using Bitcoin are just betting it will go up in value. But Bitcoin also gives people an incentive to get used to the weird concept of big systems that aren't controlled by a single authority. It's likely that the excitement and even some of the greed around Bitcoin helped fuel these blockchain experiments.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Everything is internet life, including stock fights

I've been transfixed for days by the saga of a Reddit message board and its crusade involving the video game retailer GameStop.

The short version: Several Wall Street professionals are betting that the price of GameStop stock will fall and are smugly confident they're right. A Reddit group called Wall Street Bets has been trying to prove them wrong or just mess with them by organizing to drive up GameStop's share price. The company's shares are going haywire. It's all weird and there are no heroes in this tale. (Check out Matt Levine's column in Bloomberg Opinion about this.)

When I see the Redditors versus the Wall Street dudes, I'm reminded of how being online has changed the way we relate to one another. There is no bright line between internet life and real life.

Wall Street Bets exhibits the same kind of engaged, hyper-online social momentum that helped drive the presidential candidacies of Mr. Trump and Andrew Yang and is behind the Korean pop fans who make sure their favorite bands trend online and who engage in political activism.

The GameStop campaign's swarming behavior, unity around a common cause and inside jokes — like the one about chicken tenders — have similar mechanics as the gaggles who harass gay and transgender video creators on TikTok and got a research ship named "Boaty McBoatface" a few years ago. (To be clear, stock trading campaigns aren't the same as harassing teenagers.)

Ryan Broderick, an internet culture writer, wrote in his Garbage Day newsletter that the GameStop saga showed the similarities between social media and the stock market. "If you can create enough hype around something, through memes, conspiracy theories, and harassment campaigns, you can manifest it into reality," he wrote.

My colleague Nellie Bowles wrote this week about the ways that working through screens has started to infuse office culture with the worst elements of aggressive internet conversations. That's not dissimilar to what's happening with this dark corner of stock market speculation. Humans are adapting to online life in ways that sometimes feel thrilling — and other times nihilistic and horrifying.

Before we go …

Hugs to this

May we all experience the joy that Nia Dennis, a U.C.L.A. gymnast, is having in this routine. (Thanks to our California Today writer, Jill Cowan, for featuring this video.)

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/