2021年2月5日 星期五

This Is a Primal Scream

America's mothers are in crisis. Is anyone listening to them?

This Is a Primal Scream

Csilla Klenyánszki

Today I am sending a special issue of the NYT Parenting newsletter to tell you about a new package that has been in the works for months. It's called The Primal Scream: America's Mothers Are in Crisis. Read the whole thing here.

**

In early September, as the school year inched closer, a group of mothers in New Jersey decided they would gather in a park, at a safe social distance, and scream their lungs out. For months, as the pandemic disrupted work and home life, these moms, like so many parents, had been stretched thin — acting as caregivers, teachers and earners at once. They were breaking.

As are mothers all over the United States.

By now, you have read the headlines, repeating like a depressing drum beat:

You can also see the problem in numbers: Almost 1 million mothers have left the workforce — with Black mothers, Hispanic mothers and single mothers among the hardest hit. Almost one in four children experienced food insecurity in 2020, which is intimately related to the loss of maternal income. And more than three quarters of parents with children ages 8 to 12 say the uncertainty around the current school year is causing them stress.

Despite these alarm bells clanging, signaling a financial and emotional disaster among America's mothers, who are doing most of the increased amount of child care and domestic work during this pandemic, the cultural and policy response enacted at this point has been nearly nonexistent.

ADVERTISEMENT

The pandemic has touched every group of Americans, and millions are suffering, hungry and grieving. But many mothers in particular get no space or time to recover.

The impact is not just about mothers' fate as workers, though the economic fallout of these pandemic years might have lifelong consequences. The pandemic is also a mental health crisis for mothers that fervently needs to be addressed, or at the very least acknowledged.

"Just before the pandemic hit, for the first time ever, for a couple months, we had more women employed than men," said Michael Madowitz, an economist at the Center for American Progress. "And now we are back to late 1980s levels of women in the labor force." The long-term ramifications for mothers leaving work entirely or cutting back on work during this time include: a broken pipeline for higher-level jobs and a loss of Social Security and other potential retirement income.

"Covid took a crowbar into gender gaps and pried them open," said Betsey Stevenson, an economist at the University of Michigan. Her long-term concerns are even more fundamental: Will watching a generation of mothers go through this difficult time with little support turn the next generation of women off from parenthood altogether?

ADVERTISEMENT

Times editor-at-large Jessica Bennett spent months communicating with three women, who kept detailed diaries of their days, for a look at just how much American mothers are doing every waking second.

"With everything going on, I just don't have time to take care of my mental health right now. I have to keep it together for everyone else," said Dekeda Brown, 41, one of the three mothers featured in Ms. Bennett's piece. "I feel like a ticking time bomb that is constantly being pushed to the breaking point, but then I am able to defuse myself. Goodness, this is taxing."

We wanted to give mothers across the country the opportunity to scream it out like the moms in New Jersey, so we set up a phone line. Hundreds responded with shouts, cries, guttural yells, and lots and lots of expletives. "I don't know how to feel sane again. I'm just stuck in this position for God knows how much longer," said Elise Kelner, 30, a mother of two kids under 4, when she called in from Gilbert, Ariz.

We hope this series serves as a primal scream for America's mothers, a visual representation of their struggles. We're showing all the messy, heartbreaking moments of everyday fear and chaos, and the rays of joy that can sometimes shine through. If nothing else, we want moms to know that someone is listening.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let's celebrate the tiny victories.

When my older daughter came into my room early morning to wake me up on the weekend, my sweet 5-year-old son stopped her outside my room and said: "Let Mommy sleep. She needs some sleep to have a happier day." Considering how sleep deprived I am as a working mom with both kids remote schooling, it was a relief to receive a bit of empathy. — Faye D'Silva, Toronto, Ontario

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for NYT Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

2021年2月4日 星期四

On Tech: Uber for everything

Delivery apps like Uber and Instacart are branching out. How this shakes out will affect all of us.

Uber for everything

David Adrien

One of the technology industry's big bets is that once a company is good at transporting one thing, it should be able to do the same for anything.

Companies including Uber and Instacart are starting to branch out from one area — getting people or groceries to their destination — into delivering restaurant food, prescription drugs, home goods, pet food and convenience store items. In that vein, Uber this week bought Drizly, which delivers from liquor stores.

You can imagine the potential if courier services delivered almost anything under the sun. But will it work, and is it a good thing?

It's impossible to predict whether one-stop delivery behemoths will pan out or what the ripple effects might be — both helpful and harmful. But we should pay attention to these companies' moves and think critically about the stakes for small businesses, our wallets, our communities and the U.S. work force.

First, the promise of Uber for everything, and then some of the complications.

This could be awesome. Couriers could have more work if they can pick up passengers, deliver burritos and drop off cases of beer. Selling more types of stuff could reverse losses at app-based companies like Uber and DoorDash. And it's handy for people who like shopping from their sofas. Win-win-win.

PAID POST: A MESSAGE FROM NCTA

America's cable industry is building the 10G network of the future

The 10G broadband cable network will be able to support whatever tomorrow brings. It will feature speeds of up to 10 gigabits per second, increased capacity to support more devices, and enhanced reliability and security.

Learn More

It could be good for local businesses and our communities, too. Imagine if a local toy shop or grocery store could more easily serve both the people shopping in person and those nearby who prefer delivery. Our favorite businesses could have a second life without going broke competing against Amazon or shipping orders hundreds of miles by mail.

My colleague Kate Conger told me that the pandemic has shown that many of us are eager for home delivery of everything, and that has made more tech industry watchers believe that app-based companies can successfully become one-stop delivery machines.

It's also possible that the Uber model for anything won't work out, or that if it does it will entrench the worst aspects of delivery-by-app companies.

For all Uber's talk about its beautiful dual businesses in restaurant food delivery and moving people, they are wildly different. The customers might overlap, but signing up restaurants and keeping them feeling satisfied is a whole different game than moving people around.

ADVERTISEMENT

Plus, each new type of delivered goods — groceries, convenience store items, home improvement stuff and booze — have different operations and logistics. Can one generalist be good at them all?

Also worth mentioning: Many restaurants have said that app-based delivery services have been a bad bargain. Will businesses in other industries feel the same?

If one-stop delivery companies aren't viable, it could hurt shoppers that have relied on them, businesses that have bet their futures on them — and especially the workers who are lowest in the gig-economy hierarchy.

If you hang around Silicon Valley long enough, you'll probably hear a line stolen from Ernest Hemingway that change often happens gradually and then suddenly. One order of Cheetos and beer at a time, we and app companies may be remaking our habits, communities and the labor force.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Apple cars! (Maybe.)

In 2015, my colleague Dai Wakabayashi reported for The Wall Street Journal that Apple was working on an electric vehicle. And today, the company may still be at least half a decade away from its cars hitting the roads.

I'm excited about the possibility of an Apple car. More electric cars, yes! But Apple's history shows that it's not easy being a car newcomer. And Apple may have unique disadvantages that make its brand of car no sure thing.

The latest news is that the maker of Hyundai and Kia cars is negotiating to eventually make Apple vehicles at a Kia factory in Georgia, CNBC reported on Wednesday. Teaming up with an experienced car manufacturer is probably necessary.

Apple has been here before, however. About five years ago, the company worked on car engineering with Magna International in Canada. That didn't go anywhere, because Apple's car project has been a shambles.

ADVERTISEMENT

The company has repeatedly staffed up its car initiative, changed its mind about its strategy and fired a bunch of people. Apple went back and forth, too, on whether to try for fully driverless cars, and whether it should create the car or just design the technology for it. Driverless technology is apparently back on.

Never count Apple out. But I wonder if the company's dithering reflects underlying and unfixable problems. And Apple has a cultural disadvantage here. Steve Jobs sprung the iPhone on a world surprised by it, but the company's predilection for secrecy and delight doesn't — or shouldn't — apply to driverless cars.

A driverless car has to be rigorously tested on public roads and win the confidence of regulators and the public. Apple has to clue in an army of allies on its product road map — something it doesn't do to the same extent with its gadget partners. (Apple has conducted driverless car road tests, but far less than others have.)

I hope it works. But G.M.'s whole fleet might be electric before Apple gets a single car off the factory floor.

Before we go …

  • Amazon's new boss is "Nice!" or maybe "Nice!!!!": Karen Weise and Dai have a fun glimpse at Andy Jassy, who in a few months will become the chief executive of Amazon. Jassy was a "brain double" of Jeff Bezos, one person said, and staff obsessed over Jassy's email replies of "Nice," followed by a seemingly random number of exclamation points.
  • We are living in the "attention economy" that he predicted: The New York Times's Opinion columnist Charlie Warzel chats with Michael Goldhaber, who a quarter century ago began explaining the grueling demands digital life makes on our attention and the rewards for people who are best able to command it.
  • This is a unique customer service complaint: A 90-year-old California man was so outraged by his subpar AT&T internet service that he bought an ad in The Wall Street Journal to complain about it.

Hugs to this

Scientists have discovered a new species of chameleon that is about the size of a sunflower seed.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018