2021年2月9日 星期二

On Tech: You can’t find a laptop. Or a car?

Plus, advice for video game die-hards.

You can't find a laptop. Or a car?

Robert Beatty

Are you tired of me yammering about computer chips and how important they are? Too bad.

For a host of reasons, shortages of chips are limiting production of everything from cars to video game consoles and maybe airplanes(?!). Several big automakers, including Ford and Volkswagen, have slowed or temporarily stopped manufacturing because they couldn't get the required computer chips.

Let me walk us through what's happening, how this chip hiccup might affect what we buy and some advice on what people can do.

As I wrote on Friday, computer chips are the essential electronic brains or digital memory in jet fighters, satellites, smartphones, refrigerators and more. Because making computer chips is complicated, it's tricky for factories to respond quickly when demand suddenly increases or dips.

That became a problem during the pandemic. Drastic buying surges for some types of electronics, including laptops, printers and video game consoles, made it tough for companies to have enough materials and manufacturing capacity to keep up. That's why you may have found it difficult or more expensive than you expected to buy a computer for your child's school or a webcam to work from home.

But the shortage that struck first in consumer electronics has spread to other goods.

The New York Times's reporters have been writing about the difficulty that automakers have had getting all of the computer chips they need. When a brief slowdown in car sales at the start of the pandemic boomeranged into a sales increase, automakers and their chip suppliers were caught off guard. Some chip makers had already shifted their focus to the electronics industry.

ADVERTISEMENT

The shortages for auto chips have now attracted the attention of government officials, and chip makers are racing to respond. But it can take many months for a chip to go from raw materials to the final product.

Automakers' pain trickles down to us, too. It could become harder to find the model you want, or to buy it at a price you can stomach.

And now, perhaps, the chip shortages that first hit electronics then moved on to cars will whipsaw back into electronics. Stephen Baker, who tracks the consumer hardware industry for the market research firm NPD Group, told me that the chip shortages are "a big deal." He said it probably wouldn't become easier to find the electronics that were already in high demand.

For shoppers, I'll relay the wisdom of my colleagues: Be patient. You may have to shop around. And maybe try not to break anything important because it may be tougher than you expect to find a replacement. (I joked to a colleague about encasing my smartphone in Bubble Wrap. Maybe I wasn't kidding?)

Let me leave you with an overarching question: Are our supply chains too fragile?

In the past year, we've seen bottlenecks for high-grade medical masks, computer chips, toilet paper and more. Maybe this crisis is an opportunity to reconsider the wisdom of having sprawling global networks of parts and slim quantities of products on hand — both of which leave little room for unpredictability.

ADVERTISEMENT

We've seen the risks of this before, but there have simply been too many cost advantages to ditch our "just in time" manufacturing and retail economies. Maybe that calculation will change. As we've seen this year, when there is an inevitable big disruption, it means that we're at the mercy of the cascading effects of supply hiccups.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Advice for video game die-hards

I asked Andrew Cunningham from Wirecutter, The New York Times's product recommendation site, to offer suggestions for video game fans who are looking for hard-to-find game consoles and souped up personal computers tailored to gamers. His tips have the same manic energy as advice for people trying to find coronavirus vaccines:

Anything related to video games, whether on a PC or a new console like a PlayStation 5 or Xbox Series X, is difficult to track down. Games have been more popular during the pandemic, and video-game oriented PCs and consoles also rely on more advanced chips that fewer suppliers offer.

ADVERTISEMENT

If you're buying a new model of PlayStation or Xbox and don't want to resort to paying scalpers, patience is a virtue. Call the local retail stores in your area to see if they'll tell you the days that they receive new shipments.

The store tracking website nowinstock.net is clunky, but it can alert you when online stores have consoles available. The Wario64 Twitter account also keeps tabs on that sort of thing — as well as sales for all kinds of games and accessories. It's still difficult to find consoles this way, but it's your best bet.

For gaming PCs, the conventional wisdom is that they are cheaper for you to put together from processors and graphics cards rather than buying premade gaming setups from companies like Dell. That advice doesn't apply now because the best processors and graphics cards are so hard to find — or expensive if you can get them.

If you can delay buying video game gear right now, do it! AMD and Nvidia, which make most graphics cards and the chips that go into PlayStation and Xbox consoles, are saying that they expect supply problems to last until at least this summer. It may be a bit easier — and cheaper — to buy then.

Before we go …

Hugs to this

Paul, a retired racing greyhound, is still getting used to winter. He may look slightly odd in his warm hat and clothes, but at least he's not cold.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

The covert unifier that America needed

Biden's policies have remarkably broad support.
President Biden delivers remarks at the State Department in Washington on Feb. 4.Stefani Reynolds for The New York Times
Author Headshot

By Paul Krugman

Opinion Columnist

In his inaugural speech, President Joe Biden talked a lot about "unity" — which made many progressives, myself included, very nervous. Would he do what President Obama did, scaling down his economic plans and wasting time in a vain effort to win bipartisan support?

It turns out that we needn't have worried. As I wrote in today's column, Democrats appear to have learned some lessons from the Obama years, and Biden's Congressional allies are moving fast on what seems likely to be a big economic relief package — one that seems almost certain to pass the Senate, barely, on a straight party-line vote.

Inevitably, some in the media are chiding Biden for, as they see it, going back on his promise to seek unity. But anyone who paid attention in 2009 knows that there was never a chance of getting support for economic relief, or for that matter almost anything else, from Republicans in Congress. If Biden had tried to move their way, they would simply have moved the goal posts, keeping compromise forever out of reach.

Yet there is a sense in which Biden actually is delivering on unity. He isn't giving any ground to Republican politicians; but his main proposals for Covid-19 relief draw broad support from ordinary voters, including many self-identified Republicans. So he isn't winning over any G.O.P. apparatchiks, because that's an impossible task, but he's unifying most of the country behind his agenda all the same. That is, he's a stealth unifier, with his cross-party appeal flying under the radar of pundits focused only on what politicians and activists say.

ADVERTISEMENT

In fact, public support for Biden's agenda is so strong that it poses some puzzles. For Biden's economic plans have much broader support than Obama's did at this stage of his presidency. Why? And why won't any Republican politicians go along with plans this popular?

Here's a chart I find eye-popping. It compares the public's views on the Obama stimulus in 2009, as reported in a CNN poll, with recent views on Biden's relief package, as estimated by Quinnipiac:

Americans like Biden's policiesCNN/Quinnipiac

In case you're wondering, that 2009 poll was taken while Obama was still in his honeymoon period, with personal favorables substantially higher than Biden's now (although Biden fares decently, certainly compared with his predecessor). So this reflects popular judgments on the policies, not the men. What's going on?

ADVERTISEMENT

Well, I have a theory. I've spent pretty much the whole pandemic shouting, to mainly deaf ears, that economic relief isn't "stimulus." My guess is that despite the best efforts of many in the news media to conflate the two, most voters get that; they see Biden's American Rescue Plan as, well, a rescue plan, not an attempt to pump up demand.

Not that there's anything wrong with pumping up demand, which was in fact exactly what the nation needed (and didn't get enough of) in 2009. But Keynesian economics, which underlies the case for stimulus in a depressed economy, is hard. Many people — including some professional economists — just can't wrap their minds around the idea that deficit spending can create jobs and make the nation richer. Even F.D.R. tried to balance the budget in 1937, with disastrous results.

On the other hand, the idea of helping people when disaster strikes is intuitive, and at least for now most Americans are feeling generous.

Republican politicians, of course, don't share that feeling. And they don't see any need to pretend otherwise. They're much more afraid of the party's base, which doesn't even accept Biden's legitimacy, than they are of being seen obstructing aid to Americans in need.

ADVERTISEMENT

But that more or less by definition means that they can't be won over, no matter what Biden does. The reality of where we are politically, hidden in plain sight, is that on policy Biden actually has unified a surprisingly large majority of Americans.

Quick Hits

Even Republicans used to support those $2000 checks.

But the Republican base hates compromise.

After all, their leaders blame Nancy Pelosi for the attack on the Capitol. Really.

Conservative think tanks hate the idea of helping children.

Feedback
If you're enjoying what you're reading, please consider recommending it to friends. They can sign up here. If you want to share your thoughts on an item in this week's newsletter or on the newsletter in general, please email me at krugman-newsletter@nytimes.com.

Facing the Music

Actually, we don't know the endYouTube

Scream along to some America first rap.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Paul Krugman from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018