2021年2月22日 星期一

On Tech: A city with Amazon at the center

Plus, when to replace your gadgets.

A city with Amazon at the center

Jérôme Dubois

What happens when Amazon becomes a fixture in America's towns and cities?

Erika Hayasaki wrote a recent article for The New York Times Magazine about Amazon's influence on the Inland Empire, a region east of Los Angeles where the company is the largest private employer. More than 40,000 people in the region handle or deliver Amazon orders, about double the number from two years ago.

I spoke with Hayasaki, a professor in the Literary Journalism Program at the University of California, Irvine, about what she learned researching Amazon workers in the region and what the effects are — good and bad — when Amazon comes to town.

Shira: What made you interested in writing about Amazon in the Inland Empire?

Hayasaki: My family moved to a city there called Eastvale in 2018, and Amazon's presence was immediately apparent. Near the Costco, you see twin giant Amazon warehouses with more than 6,000 employees in total. You see Amazon semi-trucks and new homes with Amazon products like Alexas built in.

Officials at the nearby Ontario International Airport showed me runways that were under construction partly for Amazon merchandise flying in and out. We see Amazon all the time as shoppers, but it's different here. I started to talk with workers about what it was like for them.

What did Amazon warehouse employees tell you that they like and don't like about their jobs?

They appreciate that Amazon offers them health and retirement benefits — and that they have jobs at a time when many others have lost work.

ADVERTISEMENT

The biggest concern that I heard was safety. That's not new, but when the pandemic hit it was intense to hear workers' fears for their lives.

And some Amazon-related jobs are precarious. I rode around with an Amazon delivery driver who also worked for an app-based delivery company. His girlfriend did, too. They were stringing together multiple forms of income for themselves and their five children. It's not an easy way to live.

Amazon is creating many new jobs with starting pay that's more than double the minimum wage. Isn't that good?

Most of the workers I spoke with would say that Amazon can do better given the company's financial success. I heard workers ask why the company increased pay by $2 an hour but only temporarily. They're working harder than ever and it's still a pandemic.

For Eastvale, what has been the effect of having Amazon there?

City officials said that they appreciated the new jobs Amazon created, but they were fearful that automation might slowly eliminate the work. And because of the way state taxes are structured, the city is getting less tax revenue than it expected from Amazon's presence.

ADVERTISEMENT

City officials also said there's a lot of wear and tear on roads with so many Amazon vehicles. And with so many people at the Amazon site, it generates a lot of calls to police and emergency services for worker injuries or just fender benders. That's a pull on local resources.

Your article discussed "company towns" — cities like Hershey, Pa., that were once dominated by a single employer. Is Eastvale like that?

No, unlike company towns of the past, Amazon doesn't control housing for employees or replace functions of the government. But in the Inland Empire there are some elements that are reminiscent of company towns. One that struck me was an Amazon career program for high school students. People spoke highly about it, but others in the community raised questions about teenagers being put on a pathway to an Amazon job.

Shoshana Zuboff, a professor emeritus at Harvard Business School, told me that Amazon goes beyond the company town phenomenon. It's a company world. Given Amazon's presence in our lives, its size and how many people the company employs, that's a combination unlike anything we've seen before.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

ADVERTISEMENT

TIP OF THE WEEK

When to replace your gadgets

Are you wondering how old is too old for that television set or internet router in your living room? The New York Times personal technology columnist Brian X. Chen explores when to consider replacing four of the important gadgets in our lives.

I'm an advocate for making your technology last as long as you possibly can. But at some point, it's time to replace your phone, computer, TV set and internet router. It's hard to know when, though. Here is a cheat sheet for when to consider retiring your current models:

Smartphones: It's wise to replace your device when your phone can no longer receive operating system updates. When that happens, some of your favorite apps may stop working properly, and you won't easily be able to get security enhancements that protect you from attacks and malware.

Apple iPhones typically can get software updates for five years, and Android phones normally get software updates for two to three years.

Computers: Similarly, when your computer can no longer get important software updates, it's probably time for it to go. But Windows and Mac PCs tend to get these updates for far longer than smartphones — from nine to 15 years. (I'm still rocking an iMac that I bought nine years ago.)

Within that time frame, though, other parts like your hard drive, laptop battery or screen may fail. When repair costs add up to become impractical, it may be time to look for a newer model.

Television sets: You could hold on to a TV for decades if you don't mind missing out on improvements in video quality. But also think about what connects to your set. If your TV is so old that you can't plug in modern devices that you want to use — video game consoles, streaming video sticks and audio equipment — then it's probably time to retire it.

Internet routers: Your Wi-Fi hub is a critical piece of infrastructure that affects everything that connects to your home internet. Generally, new Wi-Fi technologies hit the market every five years. If your router is more than five years old, you'll want to get on the latest Wi-Fi technology, because you'll probably see meaningful improvements to speed and coverage.

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times. Your support makes our work possible.

Before we go …

Hugs to this

Beware the terrifying sight of … a cat riding a Roomba pirate ship. (Turn the sound on for this one. And thanks to my colleague Erin McCann for tweeting this.)

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

2021年2月20日 星期六

Is the Group Chat Sacred?

Heidi Cruz learned the hard way that text chains can be leaked.
A roundup of new guidance and stories from NYT Parenting.
Golden Cosmos

My moms message group has long been a solace to me, especially in this pandemic year. It is a place to vent and plan and strategize, and I have definitely said many things I would not want to be blasted out into public.

ADVERTISEMENT

I thought of my own potentially embarrassing messages on Thursday night. That's when I saw the anonymously leaked texts from a chat group, which included Heidi Cruz, the wife of Senator Ted Cruz. Through this leak, we learned additional details about the Cruz family's ill-advised trip to Cancún.

The Cruzes were photographed hopping on a plane to Mexico on Wednesday, while many of the Senator's constituents in Texas lacked heat, water and power. Mrs. Cruz had invited her neighbors to come along with her to flee the "FREEZING" weather, and discussed the rates at the Ritz-Carlton in Cancún. It has been a public relations disaster for Senator Cruz.

Whatever your stance is on Cruz's politics, the chats entered the internet discourse in a big way, and struck fear in the hearts of those of us who like to be messy in our texts. "Are we all up in our group chats now, looking around, wondering who the 'most likely to snitch' might be?" wondered Allison P. Davis, a writer at New York Magazine.

As the politics reporter Ashley Parker put it in The Washington Post, "Group text chains, after all, are among the most intimate and sacred forms of communications, and if you can't trust your 'friends' not to leak them, then who can you trust?"

ADVERTISEMENT

I decided to ask two experts about their thoughts on this very modern debacle. Was leaking the chats ethical? Do you have a reasonable assumption of privacy when you're texting the moms on your block, or should you assume that the world is going to know when you step in it?

Kwame Anthony Appiah, the in-house ethicist at The New York Times Magazine and a professor of philosophy and law at New York University, said that the situation "strikes me as a pretty substantial breach of norms about confidentiality." Even though Ted Cruz is a public figure, he didn't do anything terrible enough to warrant a breach of such norms, Mr. Appiah said. We already knew that Senator Cruz had taken the trip to Cancún a day before the leak of the texts, and that his poodle, Snowflake, had been left at home in the cold.

The public gain from the additional information — which allowed people to know that Mr. Cruz was not being honest when he implied his trip was only meant to last a day — did not make it worth breaking the secrecy of the group, Mr. Appiah said. "It is unwise to wander off to a luxury hotel," during a crisis in your state when you're an elected official, "but it's not like killing somebody," he said.

Catherine Price, the founder of Screen/Life Balance and the author of "How to Break Up with Your Phone," had a different take. "It's unquestionably not a nice thing to do, and in most circumstances would be morally wrong," she said. But Ms. Price thought that because she is the wife of a public figure, Heidi Cruz should not have assumed that any of her written communication would remain private. "Unless it's encrypted, you can't assume anything is private," she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Still, "How nice would it be to feel fully safe in our correspondence with people?" mused Ms. Price. A rule of thumb for feeling safe comes from the Times's own Astead Herndon, who Tweeted, "The key to every group chat is mutually assured destruction. If you're the only one dropping tea, you're at risk. If one person is a little too silent, they gotta go." I recommend you spend your time this weekend reviewing your chats, culling the parents who are keeping it close to the vest.

Thanks for reading!

— Jessica Grose, columnist, NYT Parenting

THIS WEEK IN NYT PARENTING

Article Image

 

What Loss Looks Like: Share an Object of Remembrance

Show us the artifacts that help you memorialize a person or experience lost during the pandemic. Your submission may be included in an upcoming project.

Article Image

Ike Abakah for The New York Times

Meet the Women Who Become Surrogates

New York State will now allow gestational surrogates to carry babies for other parents. Here's why they do it.

By David Dodge

Article Image

Tim Gruber for The New York Times

My Teens Are Coronavirus Vaccine Guinea Pigs

A health journalist is getting a front-row seat to one of the most-anticipated pediatric trials in history.

By Sheila Mulrooney Eldred

Article Image

Getty Images

When Vagisil Targeted Teens, the Backlash Was Swift

Experts say the brand's new intimate care line shames young people and might even pose potential health risks.

By Dani Blum

Article Image

Kazuhiro Nogi/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Would Americans Have More Babies if the Government Paid Them?

One policy goal of a child allowance is to reverse declines in fertility, but some experts say improving families' well-being is more important.

By Claire Cain Miller

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let's celebrate the tiny victories.

My 4-year-old likes to arrange each of his stuffed animals with a book, and then we take turns "reading" their stories. Yesterday he asked if I'd like to quietly sit and read my own book, while he read to them on his own! — Erin Wedepohl, Austin, Texas

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for NYT Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018