2021年3月3日 星期三

My 4-Year-Old Is a Destroyer

Here's why I'm OK with it.

My 4-Year-Old Is a Destroyer

By Jessica Winter

Klaus Kremmerz

I'm handing over today's newsletter to Jessica Winter, an editor at The New Yorker and the author of "The Fourth Child," a new novel that is in no small part about the struggles of parenting. This week, Jessica writes about her 4-year-old's penchant for taking apart everything in her apartment, and her delight in his endless curiosity.

— Jessica Grose, columnist, NYT Parenting

**

When Grace Hopper, the trailblazing computer scientist and U.S. Navy rear admiral, was 7, she tried to figure out how her alarm clock worked by taking it apart. Still unsure after the thing was in pieces, she broke down another clock and then another. She eventually wrecked seven alarm clocks by the time her mother noticed what she was doing.

My son's timepiece of choice is battery-operated wall clocks. I often find their metal entrails artfully scattered on the living-room floor, evoking the occult rock arrangements in "The Blair Witch Project."

But if he ever attains the bona fides of Grace Hopper, he will have other childhood origin stories to choose from. There's the time he disassembled our apartment's doorbell, leaving behind a peephole in the door that he argued should be left intact, "for the fresh air." Recently, when I was speaking on an evening Zoom panel, I cut out midsentence when he attempted to reroute the Internet connection using Magna-Tiles.

And he's only 4.

My son explores his world by dismantling it. Hand him a child-size screwdriver and he can remove several light switch plates and begin unburdening a door of its hinges before you have time to reconsider your options. One morning after I'd grabbed a quick shower, I entered his bedroom to find he had removed the mattress from his bunk bed and propped it against a wall in order to examine how the bed was constructed. (The mattress weighed more than he did at the time.)

ADVERTISEMENT

I sometimes feel as though I live with Mr. Fixit from my son's beloved Richard Scarry books, ready to smash a helpful hammer into any available lighting fixture. While the mess and stress can be exasperating, it's more often hilarious. Currently, part of our apartment is taped over with supermarket circulars and garbage bags, as my son believes that these upholsteries offer enhanced sound insulation for the benefit of our cooped-up neighbors.

I've consulted all the relevant child-development texts about how to encourage yet contain my budding infrastructure guru, and I've assembled a reliable script: eliminate dangers; facilitate his passions; set firm limits for how much chaos I can stand. (Sometimes, the chaos can be strangely beautiful, as when he murdered a toner cartridge by printing endless black squares in an apparent homage to Kazimir Malevich's suprematist period.)

But the pandemic, which now accounts for one-quarter of his life, has shifted what my boundaries might have been otherwise.

My son has been more fortunate than many of his peers: His preschool has managed to stay open for much of the Covid-19 crisis, and he enjoys the company of a (mostly) indulgent older sister and a (mostly) attentive single parent who can work from home. But still: no indoor play dates, no library, no swim or gymnastics classes, no visits to his grandparents' house.

ADVERTISEMENT

To a greater extent than I would have thought possible a year ago, what stokes his imagination is contained within our apartment's 900 square feet. Maybe it's my responsibility as his parent to let him do a little renovation. After all, who else is going to see the results, and how else am I going to grab a shower?

In a time of enforced isolation, my son's chatty fixation on how things work also means that he takes up a bit more space in other people's imaginations than he might otherwise. As his mother, this pleases me. Friends and relatives send him little just-because gifts, like kid-size tool kits and old fire alarms; a former colleague recently mailed him a vintage subway map.

Current colleagues aim their laptops toward their smoke detectors whenever he joins a Zoom call, respectfully acknowledging that the fire safety inspector has logged on.

I find it bracing how his curiosity lays bare my lack of it — I'm chastened by how stumped I can be by a 4-year-old's questions about how we source the gas that cooks our food, what forces make our radiator pipes go clank in the night, how the Q train tunnel ever got dug or the basic properties of the glittering metropolis he calls "Electric City." Everything that surrounds him is an alarm clock, and he has to know how it works. My son doesn't accept the world merely for its surfaces. Really, why should anyone?

ADVERTISEMENT

Jessica Winter, an editor at The New Yorker, is the author of the new novel "The Fourth Child."

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let's celebrate the tiny victories.

My 2-year-old daughter saw the iPad charging at the dinner table once and started asking to play with it. Out of whim, I said, "It's still sleeping." She turned to me, put an index finger to her lips and said, "Shhhh," and didn't ask again. — Sarah Yuvienco, Seattle

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for NYT Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/

2021年3月2日 星期二

On Tech: A golden age of local digital stars

Plus, what if we knew the cost of convenience?

A golden age of local digital stars

Nicholas Law

The global internet is becoming a little less American, and this can be both thrilling and unsettling.

I'm a tiny bit obsessed with regional e-commerce stars like Coupang in South Korea and Jumia in parts of Africa, and how they are managing to out-Amazon Amazon (so far).

Their success is evidence of what may be an evolution away from online services as a homogeneous — and largely American-dominated — global blob. And it shows we may now be on the cusp of a golden age for country-specific or regional digital specialists.

At a time when many people and elected officials are anxious about the power of mostly American and Chinese technology giants to shape what people believe and remodel economies, it's good that there are more alternatives to Big Tech dominance. But there is also something magical about globally shared internet services.

Let's start with a brief internet history: For the first quarter-century of the modern internet, American companies — and more recently, Chinese ones — have largely been the dominant global forces. Facebook and its Instagram and WhatsApp apps, Netflix, Uber and China's Didi Chuxing and TikTok have gotten traction in many countries.

The global digital titans don't seem to be losing, but they are increasingly challenged by country-specific or regional power players. There are the regional e-commerce companies like MercadoLibre in Latin America and Tokopedia in Indonesia. Twitter is influential in India, but Twitter-like Koo is gaining ground. American tech powers look with envy at Southeast Asia's Grab and Gojek, which offer scooter rides, a hair blowout or a home loan without leaving the apps.

There are a mix of reasons for the rise of local digital stars.

First, countries are putting up more roadblocks to foreign internet services. India blocked a bunch of Chinese apps including TikTok last year during a border standoff, and that helped create a rush of made-in-India digital services. Russia's government has tried to nudge people to use homegrown internet services as a way to keep dissent from going viral at moments of crisis, as my colleague Anton Troianovski has written.

ADVERTISEMENT

But the flowering of local internet services is not always a result of protectionism and nationalism. In some cases, homegrown companies are thriving or kicking the butts of global tech superpowers because they're really good at what they do.

It can be great to have alternatives to the tech giants, but I worry about what we lose if we don't even have moments of shared culture on YouTube or an affection for Amazon in common. Maybe you think that I'm silly, but I believe that there are elements of a global internet that bring us a little closer. (And sometimes, rip the world apart. It's all complicated.)

In part because YouTube and Spotify are popular in Bogotá, Bangalore and Boise, a fractured world shares a love of reggaeton and K-pop music. When much of the world uses internet sites like Facebook and Twitter, pro-democracy demonstrations in Hong Kong help galvanize regional protest movements in Thailand and Myanmar.

I'm glad that Coupang can thrive by catering to South Koreans' love of online shopping. Indonesians deserve local corporations that know what they need better than some faraway tech giant. I also hope that we can manage to retain those fine threads of shared internet life.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

ADVERTISEMENT

What if we knew the cost of convenience?

In the Before Times, a couple times a month I would open the Grubhub app and order too much food from a burger place around the corner from me. One day I looked at the restaurant's own menu and realized that my burger and fries cost a couple dollars more in the app.

If you've used a food or grocery service like Grubhub, Instacart or DoorDash, you might have had a moment when you realized that the prices are higher than they are in the restaurant or store. Or you might have wondered what those "service fees" are.

(Read my colleague Erin Griffith's new article about Instacart's popularity during the pandemic and the company's expansion plans.)

That's because in the rush to grow as fast as possible, these apps nearly universally hide what their convenience services really cost us. What if — mind-blowing suggestion coming — we knew the real price of having a burger or groceries delivered to our door?

ADVERTISEMENT

That's not how it works. My colleague Brian X. Chen last year found that the same food ordered from four different delivery apps cost 7 percent to 91 percent more than what he would have paid if he had bought the meal directly from the restaurant.

The higher costs come from a mix of padding the prices on menu items, a muddle of service or other fees, and even a divergence in sales taxes. Courier "tips" have sometimes gone into the companies' pockets as well.

The result is that it's almost impossible to know what these services really cost or to decide for ourselves if we're paying a fair price for convenience.

I assume that my burger place around the corner marks up the prices of orders coming in by app to offset the commissions that the restaurant pays. Fair enough. Some people are choosing to use Instacart or restaurant delivery apps to avoid the risk of contracting the coronavirus. I get it. What's not fair is not knowing the true cost.

I still get takeout burgers from that place around the corner. But now I call it on the phone — the telephone! — and know that more money is staying in my pocket and the restaurant's, too.

Before we go …

  • Like voters in swing states ahead of an election: My colleagues Michael Corkery and Karen Weise reported on a drive to unionize Amazon warehouse workers in Alabama and how they're being besieged by arguments from advocates on both sides. Even the timing of a traffic light has been a point of contention.
  • Nope, tech companies can't fix everything: NBC News and Bloomberg wrote about Microsoft's struggles to help operate government vaccine websites in New Jersey, Iowa and Washington, D.C. "It was too difficult even for a tech giant like Microsoft to combine the patchwork of existing digital infrastructure across 99 counties," NBC News wrote.
  • The last purely good day on the internet: It was Feb. 26, 2015, when people were glued to the minute-by-minute saga of llamas on the loose in Arizona and a debate about "the dress." My colleague Charlie Warzel flashed back to something he wrote on the first anniversary of that great day.

Hugs to this

This giant dog and this teeny dog are best buddies, and I love it.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/