2021年3月3日 星期三

On Tech: What job sites reveal about the economy

Plus, the fight over online piracy.

What job sites reveal about the economy

Simone Noronha

This software sales job isn't really in Remote, Ore., a tiny town 200 miles south of Portland. This internship isn't either. This job is probably not in Remote, Mich., a place that doesn't appear to exist.

When the pandemic hit and millions of Americans left physical workplaces, some employers left blank the location fields in online job listings or filled in "remote." Career websites' computer systems still went through the motions of tying a do-from-anywhere job to a city and state.

That's how, as Brian Feldman wrote in the BNet newsletter a few days ago, Remote, Ore., seems to have become America's job capital.

This is a relatively trivial example of computers not being as smart as we'd like. But there's something profound here, too. Career websites reflect the collective mood of millions of American job seekers and companies. If you want a glimpse at our complicated feelings about work during and after the pandemic, job search sites are a good place to start.

I talked about this with Julia Pollak, a labor economist at the career website ZipRecruiter, who told me that she had a window onto how quickly Americans' work preferences changed at the beginning of the coronavirus crisis. She noticed a mismatch between what employers and the rest of us want.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the last year, Pollak said, the most common job search term by far on ZipRecruiter has been — you probably can guess — remote work or similar terms. There has been a big increase. For every 100 searches for remote work before the pandemic, now there are 330, Pollak said.

She said that many don't want remote work to be temporary. In ZipRecruiter's surveys of job seekers, 45 percent of respondents indicated that they preferred to find a job that would let them work from home after the pandemic is over. (An article on Wednesday from my colleagues cited similar survey results.)

To give job hunters what they were looking for, ZipRecruiter completely reprogrammed its computer systems to try to parse whether job listings that offered remote work were intended to be jobs from anywhere temporarily or permanently.

I'll add an important reminder: The debate about whether remote work will become permanent is only about a fraction of jobs. About one in four Americans who worked outside the home in July 2020 had done at least some work remotely in the prior four weeks because of the pandemic.

ADVERTISEMENT

That means three-quarters of American workers aren't doing their jobs from home, and working from anywhere will not be the reality for most Americans. (The added wrinkles are whether remote work means doing a job away from the workplace five days a week or occasionally, and whether employees or companies make that choice.)

But for the types of work that might be done remotely, there is a mismatch. A significant percentage of job hunters are saying that they want to work remotely. Employers aren't sure they want that. Career websites are seeing this tug of war firsthand.

Job postings have indicated that while initially many employers didn't want to commit to letting people work from anywhere forever, that's starting to change. "We're seeing a gradual shift to more and more jobs that can be done remotely that are listed as such," Pollak said.

ZipRecruiter now classifies about 8 or 9 percent of job postings as permanent work from home jobs, up from about 2 percent before the pandemic. The job listing websites Monster and LinkedIn also told me that remote jobs are still a fraction of open positions but have sharply increased.

ADVERTISEMENT

The career sites' computer systems are starting to adapt to job seekers' desire for more flexible work. The human bosses will still have the last word.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

The fight over online piracy

Some people have long complained that copyright law is being abused to protect people and companies from accountability.

This is one of the longest running debates over the internet, and I don't know how to resolve it. But I wanted to chew it over as an example of the high-stakes fights over internet expression that most of us don't often think about.

Vice News has recently reported on several instances of police officers playing songs on their phones while bystanders record interactions with them. Civil rights activists have said that they believe this is an effort to ensure that the videos will be taken down from websites like Instagram and YouTube.

Many internet companies have automated systems that block people from posting material that contains popular songs or movie clips. Sites like Google and Facebook also handle billions of requests each year from people, organizations and companies big and small to remove material that they say belongs to them and that they didn't give permission for others to post.

This is all in response to a 1998 law, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which requires online companies to remove copyrighted material. There are many gripes about how the law has played out.

Big entertainment companies in particular frequently say that the law and the ways that internet companies enforce it are too lax about pulling down material that they believe is improperly posted online. They also don't like having to make so many requests to enforce their copyrights.

As we've seen from Vice's reporting, some digital rights activists and smaller fish in music and entertainment effectively say the opposite — that internet companies' copyright policing too often errs in ways that protect powerful institutions or removes newsworthy information from the public record.

Writing laws is difficult. The DMCA shows that it's even harder for laws related to the internet to both keep up with people's fast-changing habits and get enforcement right.

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times. Your support makes our work possible.

Before we go …

  • When being online is your job: My Times Opinion colleagues made a short film chronicling the demands on internet celebrities in China who livestream their every move. Related: Taylor Lorenz wrote about the new bureaucracy building around professional internet stars.
  • Fancy exercise classes for cheap: My colleague Brian X. Chen tried to create the experience of a Peloton-style internet-connected indoor bicycle without spending big bucks. Don't miss the awkward moment when Brian's barbell routine was interrupted by a YouTube ad for soap.
  • A homage to internet desserts: Eater's fun history of decorative cakes said that the creative desserts now swarming Instagram and other social media sites are "a trend fueled by quarantine baking, but inspired by everything from the Instagram- and Pinterest-famous bakeries of South Korea to the video game Animal Crossing."

Hugs to this

Gurdeep Pandher makes incredible videos of his Bhangra dances. His latest is a celebration of his coronavirus vaccination filmed on a frozen lake.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

My 4-Year-Old Is a Destroyer

Here's why I'm OK with it.

My 4-Year-Old Is a Destroyer

By Jessica Winter

Klaus Kremmerz

I'm handing over today's newsletter to Jessica Winter, an editor at The New Yorker and the author of "The Fourth Child," a new novel that is in no small part about the struggles of parenting. This week, Jessica writes about her 4-year-old's penchant for taking apart everything in her apartment, and her delight in his endless curiosity.

— Jessica Grose, columnist, NYT Parenting

**

When Grace Hopper, the trailblazing computer scientist and U.S. Navy rear admiral, was 7, she tried to figure out how her alarm clock worked by taking it apart. Still unsure after the thing was in pieces, she broke down another clock and then another. She eventually wrecked seven alarm clocks by the time her mother noticed what she was doing.

My son's timepiece of choice is battery-operated wall clocks. I often find their metal entrails artfully scattered on the living-room floor, evoking the occult rock arrangements in "The Blair Witch Project."

But if he ever attains the bona fides of Grace Hopper, he will have other childhood origin stories to choose from. There's the time he disassembled our apartment's doorbell, leaving behind a peephole in the door that he argued should be left intact, "for the fresh air." Recently, when I was speaking on an evening Zoom panel, I cut out midsentence when he attempted to reroute the Internet connection using Magna-Tiles.

And he's only 4.

My son explores his world by dismantling it. Hand him a child-size screwdriver and he can remove several light switch plates and begin unburdening a door of its hinges before you have time to reconsider your options. One morning after I'd grabbed a quick shower, I entered his bedroom to find he had removed the mattress from his bunk bed and propped it against a wall in order to examine how the bed was constructed. (The mattress weighed more than he did at the time.)

ADVERTISEMENT

I sometimes feel as though I live with Mr. Fixit from my son's beloved Richard Scarry books, ready to smash a helpful hammer into any available lighting fixture. While the mess and stress can be exasperating, it's more often hilarious. Currently, part of our apartment is taped over with supermarket circulars and garbage bags, as my son believes that these upholsteries offer enhanced sound insulation for the benefit of our cooped-up neighbors.

I've consulted all the relevant child-development texts about how to encourage yet contain my budding infrastructure guru, and I've assembled a reliable script: eliminate dangers; facilitate his passions; set firm limits for how much chaos I can stand. (Sometimes, the chaos can be strangely beautiful, as when he murdered a toner cartridge by printing endless black squares in an apparent homage to Kazimir Malevich's suprematist period.)

But the pandemic, which now accounts for one-quarter of his life, has shifted what my boundaries might have been otherwise.

My son has been more fortunate than many of his peers: His preschool has managed to stay open for much of the Covid-19 crisis, and he enjoys the company of a (mostly) indulgent older sister and a (mostly) attentive single parent who can work from home. But still: no indoor play dates, no library, no swim or gymnastics classes, no visits to his grandparents' house.

ADVERTISEMENT

To a greater extent than I would have thought possible a year ago, what stokes his imagination is contained within our apartment's 900 square feet. Maybe it's my responsibility as his parent to let him do a little renovation. After all, who else is going to see the results, and how else am I going to grab a shower?

In a time of enforced isolation, my son's chatty fixation on how things work also means that he takes up a bit more space in other people's imaginations than he might otherwise. As his mother, this pleases me. Friends and relatives send him little just-because gifts, like kid-size tool kits and old fire alarms; a former colleague recently mailed him a vintage subway map.

Current colleagues aim their laptops toward their smoke detectors whenever he joins a Zoom call, respectfully acknowledging that the fire safety inspector has logged on.

I find it bracing how his curiosity lays bare my lack of it — I'm chastened by how stumped I can be by a 4-year-old's questions about how we source the gas that cooks our food, what forces make our radiator pipes go clank in the night, how the Q train tunnel ever got dug or the basic properties of the glittering metropolis he calls "Electric City." Everything that surrounds him is an alarm clock, and he has to know how it works. My son doesn't accept the world merely for its surfaces. Really, why should anyone?

ADVERTISEMENT

Jessica Winter, an editor at The New Yorker, is the author of the new novel "The Fourth Child."

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let's celebrate the tiny victories.

My 2-year-old daughter saw the iPad charging at the dinner table once and started asking to play with it. Out of whim, I said, "It's still sleeping." She turned to me, put an index finger to her lips and said, "Shhhh," and didn't ask again. — Sarah Yuvienco, Seattle

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for NYT Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018