2021年3月12日 星期五

The Daily: The Children in Government Detention

Artwork from children depicting the emotional toll of family separation. Plus, how we booked Officer Harry Dunn.

By Lauren Jackson

Hi, everyone, and welcome to Friday. Our team is grateful to be inching toward spring and ready to say goodbye forever to this pandemic winter (at least in the Northern Hemisphere). We hope it's sunny wherever you are.

This week in the newsletter, we're following up on Monday's episode to take a closer look at the emotional toll of the United States' recent border policies. Then, our producer shares how she found our guest from Wednesday, Officer Harry Dunn of the U.S. Capitol Police.

Let us know what episode stood out to you this week — our team would love to hear from you.

Behind the statistics in Monday's episode

This undated drawing depicting one child's perception of government detention was created by a migrant child at the Catholic Charities Humanitarian Respite Center in McAllen, Texas.American Academy of Pediatrics, via Associated Press

Few words were as evocative during the Trump era as "family separation." The policy, aggressively pushed by President Trump and his top aides in 2018, was one part of a zero-tolerance approach to immigration enforcement that separated nearly 3,000 migrant children from adults.

So when Joe Biden ran for the presidency, he had an easy promise to make: If elected, he would treat migrants with compassion and provide them the opportunity to request protection in the United States. But, as we described in our episode on Monday, actually delivering on that promise requires reforming a knotty and complicated system that predates the Trump administration.

"Biden's intent to create a more humane approach" to the United States' border policy, reporter Zolan Kanno-Youngs said, "is bumping up against all kinds of challenges that are making it difficult to not recreate the same problems of Trump and Obama."

ADVERTISEMENT

The perception of a friendlier stance on migration has led to a surge in attempted border crossings — including thousands of families as well as unaccompanied children. In January, Border Patrol agents caught nearly 6,000 unaccompanied children crossing the border, and many are now being confined in government shelters. Families and unaccompanied children are still being processed through a system that is stretched beyond capacity, and short-term crisis response at the border is complicating the administration's attempts at structural reform.

While we discussed these statistics in the show, we wanted to offer some context on the emotional toll of extended detention for children, both those who have been separated from their families and those who arrive unaccompanied. So we reached out to organizations working to place migrant children in shelters, and they shared with us some art produced by children who have been detained over the last few years. We selected a diary entry, a drawing and a poem that reveal how two children — one young girl and one teenage boy — have perceived the passing of time during their detention.

Take a look below, then listen to our episode to hear Zolan detail how the Biden administration is addressing the current crisis.

ADVERTISEMENT

Counting the days

In this diary entry, a seven-year-old girl counted the number of days she remained separated from her family while she was in immigration custody in 2018. She was reunited with her father after a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to reunite some separated families. Unlike some parents, her father, Daniel Paz, was still in the country when the court order was issued, allowing the government to reunite him with his daughter before he could be deported back to Honduras.

Courtesy of the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project

'Melting into an hourglass'

In this drawing and poem, David, a teenager from Central America, depicts his experience longing for his family while spending 671 days in federal custody, first in Illinois and later in Virginia. According to the Young Center for Immigrant Children's Rights, David was recently released and reunited with his sister, who also entered the country as an unaccompanied child. He is now concurrently seeking asylum and special immigrant juvenile status.

ADVERTISEMENT

Courtesy of the Young Center for Immigrant Children's Rights

An excerpt from David's poem titled, "Te Amo":

"I only want to be with you and forget about the past

Thank you for the care you have given me

And for your heart and your love that you have given me

I only want to fall apart with you

When I think of you, even my heart falls asleep

I just pass the time thinking that you and I are hugging

We're melting into an hourglass"

How we found Officer Harry Dunn

"It was a traumatic, traumatic historical event," Officer Harry Dunn of the Capitol Police said of the attack on Jan. 6.Stefani Reynolds for The New York Times

By Desiree Ibekwe

When our producer Jessica Cheung saw a video of Eugene Goodman, a Black Capitol Police officer, fending off rioters inside the Capitol on Jan. 6, she knew she wanted to talk to an officer who had been on the front lines.

"I was particularly interested in hearing from a Black officer, given the Confederate flags and white supremacist symbols we were seeing on the Hill that day," Jessica said. So, she set out to find police officers who were willing to talk openly about their experiences. She contacted officers, but none were quite ready or willing to share their stories. She had heard from others that they were forbidden to speak with the press and that they feared retaliation from their employers. And, in fact, the Capitol Police press office said officers would not be granting interviews at this time. But after multiple tries, Jessica found Officer Harry Dunn.

"It was about a week after the riots that I reached Officer Dunn," Jessica said. "He sounded pretty shaken up as he recounted his experience being called the N-word multiple times by rioters, fighting against them while being punched at and pepper sprayed with his eyes closed. I knew when I got off the phone with him that his was the story people needed to hear."

But getting him on the show wasn't easy.

He had already shared his story anonymously with another publication but feared retaliation if he were to go on the record. Jessica went back and forth with the standards team, which advises newsroom reporters and editors on ethics, fairness and style for our journalism, trying to work out how we could get him on the show. She wondered whether The Times could offer him anonymity. Perhaps we could alter his voice on The Daily? Ultimately, he decided against it. But she didn't let up.

Jessica called Officer Dunn every couple of weeks to check in on him. Then, finally, after the Capitol Police changed its policy on officers speaking to the press, he agreed to go on the record with The Times. He acknowledged that his decision was not without risk (on the night of the interview, he said he'd had a new security system installed), and Officer Dunn remains one of the only Capitol Police officers to go on the record about his experience on Jan. 6.

For your playlist this weekend

On The Daily this week

Monday: In part two of our look at President Biden's early dilemmas: How will the deal with the surge of unaccompanied children at the U.S.-Mexico border?

Tuesday: A universal child benefit had long seemed impossible in the U.S. This week, it passed. How did we get here?

Wednesday: The storming of the Capitol from the perspective of Harry Dunn, a Capitol Police officer who was on duty when it all happened.

Thursday: In explosive interviews separated by 25 years, Princess Diana and Meghan Markle forced the royal family to confront the truth about itself.

Friday: In Part 2 of Odessa, one high school tries to bring back football during the pandemic.

That's it for The Daily newsletter. See you next week.

Have thoughts about the show? Tell us what you think at thedaily@nytimes.com.

Were you forwarded this newsletter? Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox.

Love podcasts? Join The New York Times Podcast Club on Facebook.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for The Daily from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/

On Tech: Our pandemic year

The pandemic has showed how much we need technology, and its limits.

Our virtual pandemic year

Brenna Murphy

The pandemic, which officially hit the one-year mark on Thursday, showed how much we need technology — but also that it's probably not the solution to our biggest challenges.

Here are three things that I've learned in the past 12 months: Technology showed its utility by helping people and businesses manage through a crisis. Our increasingly digital lives have also created new problems that will be hard to fix. And the most important things have nothing to do with technology.

Let's talk about each of these.

First, I am grateful that technology helped many millions of us muddle through work, school and family life. It also kept us informed when little seemed to make sense.

I'm glad that my apartment was able to become On Tech's headquarters. I entertained myself with digital books and streaming videos, and I stayed in touch through screens with friends and family. I chose to shop at local businesses based on whether I could place online orders and reserve a time for pick up. Technology has helped many of us retain shreds of normalcy in a pandemic.

One big question, as my colleague Steve Lohr wrote this week, is how much this past year has permanently changed work and consumption patterns. (The most honest answer: Who knows?)

ADVERTISEMENT

People who follow technology and people's habits pretty much all say that the pandemic invented some digital behaviors out of the blue, but that mostly it fast-forwarded digital trends that had already been percolating.

More people learned to order their groceries online, tried and liked restaurant delivery services, connected with pals over video games, became used to meetings over Zoom and had appointments with their doctors by video call. A lot of this was by necessity, but there were helpful aspects to digital life. Stores, fitness studios and many other businesses have been forced to adapt faster to what consumers want.

I hope we can keep the best of these new behaviors and attitudes. I also worry that those benefits came with profound downsides — and that the upsides haven't been shared equally.

It is my everlasting fury that so many Americans, particularly Black and Latino people and those living in rural areas, cannot access the internet from home. And we don't really know exactly the size of the problem.

ADVERTISEMENT

And the technology that promised to bring restaurant owners, product merchants and job seekers more income during challenging times also created new and unwelcome dependencies on the digital middlemen, such as DoorDash, Amazon and Uber. The influence and economic might of the Big Tech superpowers become even more glaring. It will be a failure if the new digital economy — like the old economy — does not work for everyone.

And my lasting memory of the past 12 months is that technology often does not matter very much.

Humans and human-run institutions pulled off last year's presidential election with few problems. Humans also were largely responsible for undermining credibility in the election outcome.

Humans looking out for one another as well as policymakers' choices were the most important factors in keeping people safe — or not — during the pandemic. And the magic of coronavirus vaccines and the protests that demanded a more fair country had little to do with what we think of as technology.

ADVERTISEMENT

It's been a long, awful year and let's hope that the next 12 months will be brighter. And also let us hold in our minds that people, not technology, change the world.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

What's your new tech habit?

We want to hear about a tech habit that you started during the pandemic. Share with On Tech how it's helped you manage the past year or unleash your creativity. What do you like (and hate) about your new virtual behavior? Do you see yourself keeping it?

Please include your full name and where you live (city or town and state or country). We may publish a selection in an upcoming newsletter. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

Before we go …

  • Getting to Facebook's core problem: An MIT Technology Review writer wondered why the Facebook team responsible for fairness in computerized decisions wasn't changing the automated rankings of posts that polarized people. Her question led to this nuanced article about the root problem of Facebook seeking to maximize our attention.
  • China can't get enough of Elon Musk: China's technology workers are feeling pessimistic about their industry and disillusioned about the country's technology tycoons. Instead, my colleague Raymond Zhong reported, Musk has become the tech figure of the moment in China.
  • Yes, Netflix knows that 10 friends share the same password: The company hasn't wanted to mess with people sharing passwords, but now it's testing a way to nudge some people to get their own account, The Streamable reported.

Hugs to this

"I told him my name is Tony, to which he replied sarcastically 'like Tony Hawk haha.'"

The most famous skateboarder in history met a kid at a skate park who didn't recognize him. It was wonderful. (This happened in 2019, but the whims of the internet made Hawk's Twitter thread popular again this week.)

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/