2021年3月26日 星期五

The Daily: The Forgotten Sense

Regaining what the coronavirus took from you.

By Lauren Jackson, Mahima Chablani and Desiree Ibekwe

Hi everyone, phew, we made it to Friday. There was some heaviness in our coverage this week — including some of the neurological symptoms of long-Covid and the King Soopers shooting in Colorado. In between, we tried to splice in some brightness: the prospect of widespread vaccination and a nursing home's first day out of lockdown. To keep the optimism going, we'd love to hear what you're most looking forward to in a post-vaccination future. Shoot us an email and we might share your update in a future newsletter. (And if you're still questioning whether a vaccine is for you, take a look at this guide answering your questions about vaccine safety and access.)

In this week's newsletter, we talk to our California restaurant critic, and Tuesday's guest, Tejal Rao about what she's cooking now that she has her sense of smell back. Then we introduce you more formally to our fabulous politics producer, Rachel Quester.

ADVERTISEMENT

Willing your sense of smell back into existence

Ryan Jenq for The New York Times

On Tuesday's episode we heard from Tejal Rao, a food critic for The Times, who embarked on a journey to regain her sense of smell after contracting the coronavirus. In the episode, you heard about smell training — a long and tedious process few knew existed before the coronavirus stole the sense from millions of people. We wanted to ask Tejal a little bit more about that journey and what helped her along the way.

Based on your experience with smell training, what scents would you recommend trying to our readers who might have also lost their sense of smell?

ADVERTISEMENT

The original studies of smell training were done with four specific essential oils, but all the researchers I spoke to when I was reporting encouraged me to use scents that were meaningful to me, whatever those might be. So I worked with spices from my kitchen — cardamom, cloves, cinnamon. I sniffed everything I could — snuffed matches, my dogs' breath. I even ran outside to get a whiff of the garbage truck on trash days. I tried absolutely anything that might give my nose and brain more information as I healed, whether it was a "good" smell or not.

What was it like to keep doing your job with a limited sense of smell?

I didn't work in those few weeks, mostly because I was too exhausted by my other symptoms. When I came back to work, I still had a fragmented sense of smell, so I focused on stories I'd started reporting before I got sick, and relied on our team of recipe testers and editors for their notes on anything cooking related. It took about two months to totally regain my sense of smell — that's when I finished up a story about the West Coast bagel boom, which I'd started reporting before the pandemic.

What have you been cooking lately that you'd recommend?

Food is glorious and nuanced and delicious again now that my sense of smell and taste are back, and I'm so grateful for it. I've been making Yewande Komolafe's delicious, crispy bean cakes with harissa, and right now I've got my eye on Von Diaz's pollo en fricasé with garlic and olives and capers. The second I get strawberries from the farmer's market, I'm making Clare de Boer's strawberry and sesame swirl soft serve.

Talk to Tejal on Twitter: @tejalrao.

ADVERTISEMENT

Meet Rachel Quester: senior producer and politics powerhouse

The audio producer Rachel Quester.Eric Krupke

For this month's producer profile, we're talking to Rachel Quester, a senior audio producer. The Florida native has been with The Daily since its earliest days and is one of the politics experts on the team.

What were you doing before you came to The Times?

I was a producer for the NPR Politics podcast, which I joined at the beginning of 2017 as the Trump administration was getting underway. I spent a few months there before I turned on The Daily for the first time and fell in love with the show's approach to the news. Before NPR, I spent three years at the Scripps Washington Bureau producing a weekly podcast called DecodeDC.

You were one of the first few hires on The Daily in 2017. What can you tell us about those early days? Any memorable moments?

Where to begin? It was exhilarating! We were such a small team trying to tackle nonstop breaking news in a format that was new to the institution. We were like a pack of nomads, finding whatever open space in the glass conference rooms of The New York Times that we could cram into to make the show each day.

I'll never forget one moment in May of 2017. Our small crew was sitting in our studio on the 16th floor, which was a converted storage closet. Suddenly, our executive producer Theo Balcomb gasped and read aloud the breaking news: President Trump had just fired James Comey, the F.B.I. director. It feels as if we've lived decades since this moment in May 2017, but at the time this was huge news. We knew we had to throw out the show that was almost done and start the next day's episode from scratch — something that has happened several times in the history of The Daily.

We've heard you've started teaching a graduate course. What's that been like?

Teaching has long been a goal of mine, and I'm loving every minute of it! I'm an adjunct professor for a class in Columbia's graduate journalism program. I find that teaching is helping me to become a better producer, because it makes me think intentionally about what I do day in and day out. It's so easy to get lost in the making of the show, but teaching helps me take a step back and articulate the intention behind our work.

Do you have a favorite political story you've worked on for The Daily?

The reason I love politics is because at its core, it's human driven — a lot of what happens in our country and in our world is because of decisions made by people in power. And so I've especially loved working on episodes that dive into the human experience of politics, whether it be a leader grappling with their decisions or someone being directly impacted by those decisions.

I've been part of The Daily for every major political story the past four years — like the Mueller investigation, both impeachments and the 2020 election. But I think the moment that will stick with me most is the siege of the Capitol on Jan. 6 and watching it unfold in real time. It felt like a culmination of all those other stories colliding at once.

Have you picked up any hobbies during quarantine?

I've come to love and rely on taking long walks in the morning. I've relocated to Florida for the time being, and the crystal-blue skies, warm weather and palm trees definitely make walking a great way to start my day.

Do you have any recommendations for our newsletter readers?

If you're looking for a quick, easy and delicious snack, I recommend this salsa recipe. I've made it several times over the past year, in part because I miss going out to restaurants and eating chips and salsa. In terms of fun things to do, I've spent many nights with my family playing Euchre, which is a card game full of strategy and risk-taking. It's a great way to pass the time!

Talk to Rachel on Twitter: @rquester.

On The Daily this week

Monday: We hear from Ivan Agerton, a 50-year old former marine, who started experiencing psychosis last fall after falling ill with the coronavirus.

Tuesday: Tejal Rao's journey to regain her sense of smell after losing it because of the coronavirus.

Wednesday: After two mass shootings in under a week, Joe Biden has called on Congress to ban assault weapons. We chart his three-decade effort to put gun control in effect.

Thursday: A check-in on the latest in the United States' vaccination effort and a look ahead to life after the vaccine.

Friday: After being separated for months during the lockdown, the now-vaccinated residents of a West Virginian nursing home are reunited. Here's what the first day out of lockdown sounded like.

That's it for The Daily newsletter. See you next week.

Have thoughts about the show? Tell us what you think at thedaily@nytimes.com.

Were you forwarded this newsletter? Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox.

Love podcasts? Join The New York Times Podcast Club on Facebook.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for The Daily from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/

On Tech: NFTs are neither miracles nor scams

Plus, tech has changed for the better.

NFTs are neither miracles nor scams

Ben Denzer

On Thursday, my colleague Kevin Roose sold a crypto token of a newspaper column for more than half a million dollars. (For charity!) Someone paid $69 million for a digital file of a collage that anyone can view online.

This is part of the mania of the moment in NFTs, or nonfungible tokens, and they are an example of people rushing to judgment about basically anything new and novel.

I have some straight talk: The proliferation of NFTs will probably not be the world-changing revolution that its proponents claim. And it's probably not an entirely absurd bubble, either. As with other emerging technologies, there is a good idea in there somewhere if we slow down and resist the hype.

Allow me to explain to normal humans what's happening: NFTs are essentially a way to transform a digital good that can be endlessly copied into something one of a kind. When someone buys an NFT, what they're effectively getting is the knowledge of owning an official version of a cat with a Pop-Tart body, a song, a video clip of a basketball dunk or another virtual thing. The records of ownership are maintained on a blockchain. (For more, check out this delightful explanation from the Verge.)

Perhaps you find this confusing or silly. Push that aside for a minute.

Mostly, my beef about NFTs is how people, particularly those who live and breathe technology, talk about them and other emerging companies or concepts including the blockchain, the audio chatroom Clubhouse and ultra fast trains.

ADVERTISEMENT

Almost immediately, people sort themselves into camps to declare that THIS WILL CHANGE THE WORLD or it's TOTAL CODSWALLOP THAT WILL RUIN EVERYTHING. We would all benefit from more breath and less breathlessness.

In life, most things are neither glorious revolutions nor doom. And behind most novel ideas is often the possibility of something useful. The trouble is that hyperbole and greed often make it hard to sort the glimmers of promise from the horse manure. So let's take a step back.

The purported big idea behind NFTs, as Kevin and Charlie Warzel, my colleague in Opinion, each explained this week, is to tackle a problem that the internet created. With sites like YouTube and TikTok, anyone now has the power to make music, a piece of writing, entertainment or another creative work and be noticed. But the internet has not really fulfilled the promise of enabling the masses to make a good living from what they love.

NFTs and the related concept of the blockchain hold the promise to, in part, give people ways to make their work more valuable by creating scarcity. There is promise in letting creators rely less on middlemen including social media companies, art dealers and streaming music companies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Will any of this work? I don't know. Run screaming from anyone who has a definitive answer either way. Basically, everyone should listen to the wise and measured Anil Dash, a veteran of the tech industry who accidentally helped invent the concept behind NFTs and is both furious about the hucksters swarming them and believes that there's a there there.

That said, NFTs will probably not fix the broken economics of streaming music or tear down the power structures of the journalism and art worlds. Sorry to be a broken record, but technology is not magic. Likewise, cryptocurrencies are probably not an effective fix for unaffordable housing. A complicated and expensive train may not be the best solution for global warming and our car addiction.

So, are NFTs a bubble inflated by unusual financial conditions and our brains turning to goo in the pandemic? Definitely. Are they pointless Beanie Babies for rich tech bros who are ruining the planet with all the energy required to create the digital tokens? Not entirely, no.

Maybe they are somewhere in between. And that's fine.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tech has changed for the better

It often feels as if policy debates about technology are a hamster wheel going nowhere. But there is progress if you squint a little.

Tech journalists' reaction to the 4,000th congressional hearing into the power of Big Tech on Thursday was mostly: [muffled screams]. Yes, elected officials and technology chief executives went around in verbal circles. And it felt as if America's policymakers were moving at a snail's pace to resolve whether and how laws should change to make tech companies more accountable, effective and fair.

All true. But let me give two examples of tech companies actually becoming more transparent and effective. We should grumble about what hasn't changed, but we shouldn't ignore what has.

In the last few years, Facebook, Google and Twitter created searchable databases of ads running on their websites and offered some ability to analyze them. The companies' disclosures are wildly flawed and insufficient, but I'd still say that it's better than what we had before: zero visibility into what ads were circulating to billions of people.

That was a problem when Russia-backed trolls spread social media propaganda around the 2016 U.S. presidential election. After that debacle, Congress debated new laws requiring tech companies to maintain online libraries of political advertising. That hasn't happened, but the companies did a version of it themselves.

There are two ways of looking at this. Either America's big corporations are more accountable than our elected leaders. Or the fear of more muscular laws forced tech companies to do something different. Either way, I'd call it measured progress for which elected leaders and tech companies deserve some credit.

Tech companies and U.S. government officials also capably handled attempts by foreign governments to mess with the 2020 election, as I've written about before. Even absent some Big Bang Big Tech law, both our powerful tech institutions and elected leaders were scared enough to address a threat to Americans.

None of this is a substitute for effective law making. But it's also not true that nothing has happened in tech policy besides yelling and screaming.

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

Before we go …

  • Weaponizing shame in money lending: A new breed of online loan apps in India require people to hand over information from their phones. And they bombard borrowers and their contacts with phone calls and social media posts to squeeze them for repayments, my colleagues Mujib Mashal and Hari Kumar reported.
  • How TikTok changed music and us: You definitely want to listen to this podcast with my colleagues Jenna Wortham and Wesley Morris discussing the creative expression of musical challenges on TikTok, and why the app has helped kill the bridge between a pop song verse and chorus.
  • What does it cost to fully replace cable TV with online alternatives? It comes to $92 a month, Bloomberg News calculates.

Hugs to this

Check out this 5-day-old owl being fed VERY carefully with tweezers. My favorite moment is the tiny owl flapping its wings when it swallows.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/