2021年4月6日 星期二

Why did “infrastructure week” become a joke?

A theory of Republican policy haplessness.
The Brent Spence Bridge on the Ohio-Kentucky border is considered to be "functionally obsolete" due to the amount of daily traffic it carries, more than its original design.Jeff Dean/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Author Headshot

By Paul Krugman

Opinion Columnist

Today's column is about Republican attempts to discredit President Biden's American Jobs Plan by insisting that it really isn't an infrastructure plan. As I explain in the column, they're wrong on substantive grounds: Investing in the future should include a lot of things that don't match a narrow definition of infrastructure.

But I also believe that they're messing up the politics. If they really wanted to sabotage Biden's plans, or at least make him pay a political price for moving forward, they should be offering a halfway plausible alternative — a real if grossly inadequate infrastructure plan of their own. Whining that nothing besides roads and bridges qualifies — not even rail, or water, or the electrical grid, or broadband — just highlights their own unwillingness to be serious.

Better yet, they could have passed a minimalist, steel-and-concrete-only bill while their own guy was in the White House. If they had, he might still be there, and in any case they might have pre-empted the expansive initiative currently on the table.

So why didn't they? Why did "It's infrastructure week!" become a running gag line?

Part of the answer was the sheer incompetence of the Trump administration, in which almost nobody had any idea how to do policy substance (as we saw, tragically, in the administration's Covid-19 response.) Beyond that, however, the modern G.O.P. is allergic to any proposal to spend taxpayer money to advance the public good.

ADVERTISEMENT

Way back in November 2016 I looked at the sketch of an infrastructure proposal offered by the Trump team and was struck by their almost pathological unwillingness to just do the obvious thing and, you know, build infrastructure. Instead they suggested a complicated scheme that would offer huge tax credits to private investors who would then be rewarded with user fees: build a highway, mainly with taxpayer dollars, then collect all the tolls for yourself.

As I noted at the time, this scheme wouldn't work at all for infrastructure spending that can't be monetized, like repairing levees or cleaning up hazardous waste. And even where it might have been possible to collect user fees, the scheme would offer huge potential for abuse and cronyism (although that might have been a selling point to those proposing it).

It's not surprising, then, that infrastructure never happened. But why the Rube Goldberg nature of the proposal, such as it was? Why not just build infrastructure?

The answer, I think, comes down to a blend of ideology and cynical politics.

Today's G.O.P. is the party Ronald Reagan built, a party that always sees government as the problem, not the solution; people who've spent decades steeped in that mind-set just can't wrap their minds around the idea of using government spending, not tax cuts, to solve a problem. For a time, people in Trump's inner circle, like Steve Bannon, seemed ready to break out of this box. But they couldn't free their minds — and even if they could have, people like Mitch McConnell would have stood in their way.

ADVERTISEMENT

For smart Republicans — McConnell may be a destructive force, but he's no dummy — believe that there are political spillovers when government acts effectively. Once voters see the government do something well, they worry, the public will be more inclined to have it do other things they don't want it to do, like reducing poverty and curbing the accumulation of wealth at the top. To be fair, the Biden team has the same belief: it wants to use the popularity of its pandemic response to advance a broad center-left agenda.

Still, the odds are that Republican obstruction will end up empowering the very things the G.O.P. wants to avoid, just as it did on stimulus. Republicans might have been able to hold Biden down to half a loaf. Instead, by insisting that he could only have crumbs, they may have given him the whole thing.

Quick Hits

Republican selflessness?

How much is $2 trillion?

Was the Obama stimulus secretly a new New Deal?

Or is Biden bringing the real Deal?

ADVERTISEMENT

Feedback
If you're enjoying what you're reading, please consider recommending it to friends. They can sign up here. If you want to share your thoughts on an item in this week's newsletter or on the newsletter in general, please email me at krugman-newsletter@nytimes.com.

Facing the Music

How can it feel this wrong?YouTube

Since we're talking about infrastructure

IN THE TIMES

Robert A. Mundell, a Father of the Euro and Reaganomics, Dies at 88

His insights on global finance earned him a Nobel, while his more iconoclastic theories fostered the adoption of a single European currency and supply-side economics.

By Tom Redburn

Article Image

Billions in New Obamacare Subsidies Are Now Available on Healthcare.gov

Nearly everyone with a marketplace health plan can seek more financial help. Many uninsured Americans and people who buy their insurance elsewhere can also benefit.

By Sarah Kliff and Margot Sanger-Katz

Article Image

Democrats Win Crucial Tool to Enact Biden's Plans, Including Infrastructure

A ruling from the parliamentarian appears to clear the way for Democrats to bypass Republicans and fast-track at least one more fiscal package through the Senate on a majority vote.

By Emily Cochrane

Article Image

Biden and Democrats Detail Plans to Raise Taxes on Multinational Firms

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the U.S. would support a global minimum tax, while top Democrats unveiled their own plan to raise taxes on multinational firms.

By Jim Tankersley and Alan Rappeport

Article Image

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Paul Krugman from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/

2021年4月5日 星期一

On Tech: What’s good about tech bubbles

Plus, how to score a cheap airfare.

What's good about tech bubbles

Nicholas Law

Let's talk about what Britain's bicycle bubble more than a century ago has in common with current crazes for nonfungible tokens, technology start-ups and electric vehicle companies.

We're more than 10 years into a technology gold rush that in some corners makes absolutely no sense. If and when the zaniness fades, people could lose a fortune. But collectively, tech manias do bring some good. As my colleague Erin Griffith said: "Bubbles, while messy, lead to progress."

I spoke recently to William Quinn, a lecturer at Queen's University Belfast and co-author of "Boom and Bust," a history of financial bubbles including the 1929 stock market crash in the United States and the financial crisis more than a decade ago.

The book identifies three root conditions present in bubbles: Borrowing money is cheap or people have a lot of money saved up. It gets simpler to buy and sell assets, like what's happening now with stock trading apps including Robinhood. And there's a mentality that the prices of assets can only go up.

All of those conditions, as Griffith recently wrote in a hilarious and useful article, are present now. That's partly why we're seeing repeated spikes of "meme" stocks such as GameStop, hype about NFTs, and eye-popping IPOs including the one that left Airbnb's chief executive speechless.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Quinn also told me that technology-related bubbles are different in important respects to other boom-and-bust cycles. For one, they don't tend to ruin the world. "I'm not worried about NFTs causing the next financial crisis or anything like that," he said.

Unlike the housing market bubble, technology bubbles aren't typically inflated by borrowed money that can cause cascading effects. Speculative technologies are also often somewhat disconnected from the rest of the economy.

And, Quinn said, when tech bubbles burst, they can leave behind something positive. Enter the bicycle bubble.

The invention of the "safety" bicycle in the late 1800s was a revelation, and the basic design lives on today. We might not think of the bicycle as technology, but it was a significant innovation for relatively reliable and affordable transportation.

ADVERTISEMENT

It also kicked off a mania of British bicycle manufacturers that went public, posted soaring stock prices and then collapsed. What was left behind, Quinn says, were people and companies that, in some cases, helped usher in new innovations in cars, motorcycles and road tires. Some of the bicycle pioneers are still around.

Like the bicycle bubble, good things happened in the wake of the late 1990s dot-com bubble in the United States. Companies including Amazon survived and thrived. Bankrupt telecommunications companies left behind cheap and useful internet pipelines that enabled an online explosion.

More recently, a cryptocurrency collapse several years ago got more people curious about the benefits of the promising underlying technology, such as the blockchain.

"The bubble mania can be distracting," Griffith said, but she added: "The perspective of a lot of people in tech and finance is that a mania or a frenzy drives attention, excitement, enthusiasm and talent to something new."

ADVERTISEMENT

I don't want to ignore the harm of tech busts. When bubbles burst, people lose their jobs and, in some cases, all of their savings. Quinn said that he believes regulators should do more to prevent hucksters from cheating people and walking away with millions. Griffith said she's worried that people who go broke on tech fads might become embittered.

Quinn said he believes that bubbles, which were relatively rare between the 1920s and the 1980s, are now happening more frequently. Money and information travel quickly around the world, which helps fuel manias. Bubbles may be a fixture of modern life — with all the potential harms and benefits that come with them.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

TIP OF THE WEEK

How to score a cheap airfare

As more of us prepare for when it will be safe to fly, the New York Times consumer technology columnist Brian X. Chen tells us how to save on airfare with his favorite ticket price prediction app.

If you're like me and desperate to go somewhere, it might be a great time to start hunting for travel deals — even if you don't plan to travel until the winter because … pandemic.

There are nifty apps that use algorithms to predict when airfares will dip. I've scored some remarkable deals, saving hundreds of dollars on flights to Hawaii, New York and Taiwan. These algorithms might be a bit less dependable during such an unpredictable year, but it's still worth checking them out.

My favorite app for saving on flights is Hopper. The free app on iOS and Android lets people register for price-alert tracking that recommends whether to buy a plane ticket now or wait for prices to drop for your destination. (Hopper also tracks prices for hotels and car rentals, though I haven't used those features.)

Here's how to use the Hopper app:

  • Tap the Flight button and enter the airport you're departing from and the airport at your destination.
  • Select your preferred travel dates. Hopper will show you a color-coded calendar, with green dates showing the least expensive days to fly and red for the highest prices. You can choose to view ticket prices only for nonstop flights.
  • Sit back and wait for advice: Once you select the travel days, Hopper will send notifications to suggest whether to buy tickets now or wait for the price to drop. I tend to look at the Hopper flight alerts and then purchase tickets directly through the airline.

(Be aware that when large numbers of flights were canceled during the pandemic, Hopper was overwhelmed with complaints from people who booked tickets through the app and had trouble getting help.)

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

Before we go …

  • Pushback against Amazon's zeal for control: The company needs to lower labor costs and increase productivity, which is why Amazon measures every moment of a worker's existence, my colleague David Streitfeld wrote. The pushback against Amazon's desire for control is showing up in restive warehouse workers, Congressional oversight, labor regulatory attention and tweets about bathroom breaks.
  • App filters may be a real-life social experiment on girls: MIT Technology Review examines the risks of app features that "beautify" people's appearance by erasing blemishes, changing eye color and recoloring faces and bodies. Some of these filters can be playful and helpful, but some researchers and teens worry that it's skewing the self-image of women and girls.
  • When Facebook is the local news channel: A Facebook group dedicated to local information in and around Beaver County, Pa., helps spread news about potholes, closing businesses and shoplifting. But NBC News wrote that the police have also had to intervene to dispel exaggerations and falsehoods in the group, including false rumors about a killer on the loose that needlessly frightened people and tied up officers.

Hugs to this

La Verne Ford Wimberly, an 82-year-old woman in Tulsa, Okla., has been wearing her Sunday best each week for virtual church service. Her selfies on Facebook of her colorful attire (including hats!) have made her a star.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/