2021年4月26日 星期一

On Tech: What’s behind the Apple-Facebook feud?

The fight between the two tech giants might remodel the internet as we know it.

What's behind the Apple-Facebook feud?

Brenna Murphy

Starting on Monday, people with iPhones will begin to see pop-up messages on their screens asking whether they will permit companies to follow them from app to app.

Currently, Facebook and companies like it track the ways people use their phone, picking up bits of information such as how often they open their yoga app and what they buy at Target. Facebook then uses that information to help companies target their ads.

Apple says that it wants people to have a choice about participating in this information-harvesting system. Facebook says these ads help make the internet free for all. These two companies have incompatible views of the future of digital life, and they really don't like each other, as my colleagues Mike Isaac and Jack Nicas detailed.

Jack talked to me about why we should pay attention to a fight between two tech giants, and which company is right. Spoiler alert: They're both a little right, and a little gross.

Shira: What does this new iPhone feature do, and why is Facebook so mad about it?

Jack: With the latest iPhone software update, companies and advertisers must ask explicit permission — in the form of yes-or-no messages that pop up on the screen — to track people from one app to another.

ADVERTISEMENT

Many app companies, including Facebook, have predicted that large numbers of people will say no. And that means companies that rely on showing people online ads may have less data to fine tune the ads based on our activity and interests.

Why should people care about this long-running beef between Apple and Facebook?

The winner could decide the shape of the consumer internet going forward. Apple's view is that people should pay a premium, often to Apple, to have a private, safe experience in digital spaces. Facebook's position is that the internet should remain open and free, and that advertisers have made that possible.

So who's right: Apple or Facebook?

Facebook is right that billions of people have been able to get access to social networks, email, news and entertainment because they're paid for by ads. The company's message is that this system needs data on us to advertise effectively and efficiently.

ADVERTISEMENT

And Apple is right that digital advertising largely operates without people's true consent or knowledge.

Apple's message seems simpler.

That's true. Apple's view is that it's simply giving people a choice of whether to be tracked across apps or not. Facebook's argument to the public is more complex — that they have to be tracked for the internet to work, and that people don't know what's good for them.

Wait, let's go back to the hypocrisy part.

Facebook is worried about its own profits being hurt by Apple's new feature. It has mostly focused, though, on making the smaller businesses that advertise on Facebook the face of its opposition to Apple's app-tracking feature. Yes, smaller companies could be hurt, but it's fair to ask whether my local pizzeria needs to know what I'm doing on a fitness app to effectively advertise to me.

ADVERTISEMENT

And Apple won't admit that what it's doing is great for the company, not just iPhone owners. It's good marketing to be able to say that iPhones are the place for privacy. Apple also says that targeted digital advertising is dangerous, but it gets billions of dollars each year from Google, the biggest targeted ad company.

Is it possible that this iPhone app-tracking feature won't be a big deal?

To be honest, yes. It's not easy to predict the impact of this iPhone change or whether companies will counter it with different information-gathering methods. There's a chance that lots of people say no to app tracking when iPhones offer the choice, but the advertising industry keeps chugging along.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

TIP OF THE WEEK

Meet the new Siri

Brian X. Chen, the consumer technology columnist for The New York Times, is here to guide us through new capabilities for Siri that are also part of the updated iPhone software:

In my latest column, I dived into some of the most notable new features in Apple's iOS 14.5, the software update for iPhones and iPads that Apple plans to release on Monday. (Look for the update in the Settings app and the "Software Update" menu.)

But there's lots of other new goodies in the updated software focused on Siri, Apple's voice assistant.

For one, you can now ask Siri to call your emergency contact. To set someone as an emergency contact, open the Health app, tap on your picture and select Medical ID. In this menu, you can add an emergency contact from your address book. Now when you say, "Hey Siri, call my emergency contact," it will ring the phone of that person.

Also, for fans of Apple Maps — I know there are some of you out there — you can now report a road accident that will pop up for other Maps users by saying, "Hey Siri, there's a crash up ahead."

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

Before we go …

  • Internet slander is big business: My colleagues Aaron Krolik and Kashmir Hill found that people running websites that smear people's reputations online are often also the same people selling services to delete those lies. Follow along as they unravel the slander industry.
  • Silencing criticism of India's pandemic management: India again ordered internet companies to block some posts that were critical of the government, this time over its handling of the deadly coronavirus surge in the country. My colleagues Karan Deep Singh and Paul Mozur reported that Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are faced with an unappealing choice of silencing people or defying the government.
  • Modern life with less damage to the planet: Tim Heffernan at Wirecutter, The Times's product recommendation site, has tips on more environmentally conscious online shopping, including ordering several items at once and choosing slower delivery when possible.And in our Opinion section, the journalist Damon Beres writes that electronic "devices must be repairable by all and kept compatible with software updates for as long as possible."

Hugs to this

Peregrine falcons are basically avian Terminators. You can watch a live online video feed of a pair of these endangered birds in their nest on a bridge in New York.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

2021年4月24日 星期六

Now My Kid Knows How Dumb I Really Am

The case for learning new things alongside your child.
A roundup of new guidance and stories from NYT Parenting.
Golden Cosmos

There are so many questions my 8-year-old asks me that I struggle to answer, showing her over and over again just how dumb I am. Because lately she's been fixated on learning the names of all the U.S. presidents in order, she has been asking things like, "Was William Howard Taft a good president?" Honestly, I have no idea. The only fact I know about him is that he once got stuck in a bathtub (which, as it turns out, is probably a fat-phobic myth anyway).

ADVERTISEMENT

Instead of just living in blissful ignorance while my daughter asks daily questions about various heads of state, this wonderful essay by Tom Vanderbilt has inspired me to learn about American history alongside her, so we can discuss Grover Cleveland together. (Did you know he's the only president to serve two nonconsecutive terms? Now we both do.) Tom writes about his decision to take on new challenges, from surfing to chess, with his daughter: "Not only would this be a great bonding experience — and just fun for me — but I could model the act of learning itself."

Also new this week, in honor of Earth Day, Michelle Nijhuis tells us how to instill a love of nature in your kids year round. Adam Grant has pinpointed that pandemic blah you're feeling: It's an emotion called "languishing," and he has tips for how to fix it. Gia Kourlas writes about a baby boom among professional dancers — they couldn't perform during the pandemic, so they decided to use the break to become moms. Finally, a preliminary study finds no evidence that the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines are unsafe during pregnancy.

Do you find yourself feeling like the influencers you follow on social media and fitness experts you watch on streaming platforms are your real-life friends? I want to talk to you for a story. Drop me a line here.

Thanks for reading!

— Jessica Grose, columnist, NYT Parenting

THIS WEEK IN NYT PARENTING

Article Image

Jan Buchczik

Want Your Kid to Learn Something New? Sign Yourself Up, Too.

How taking on unfamiliar challenges alongside my daughter benefits us both.

By Tom Vanderbilt

Article Image

Enzo Pérès-Labourdette

Plant a Love of Nature in Your Kids

This Earth Day, show kids they can find refuge in the outdoors.

By Michelle Nijhuis

Article Image

Manshen Lo

There's a Name for the Blah You're Feeling: It's Called Languishing

The neglected middle child of mental health can dull your motivation and focus — and it may be the dominant emotion of 2021.

By Adam Grant

Article Image

Maridelis Morales Rosado for The New York Times

'I Wish I Got Pregnant in March!' Inside the Dance Baby Boom.

Many dancers have taken advantage of a byproduct of the pandemic — time away from performing — to try out a new role: motherhood.

By Gia Kourlas

Article Image

Hannah Beier/Reuters

No evidence that Pfizer or Moderna vaccines are unsafe during pregnancy, a preliminary study says.

Early research suggests that two Covid-19 vaccines pose no greater risk for pregnant people than for anyone else.

By Emily Anthes

Article Image

iStock

Ask Well

What Questions Do You Have About Sleep?

Plagued by insomnia? Waking up in the night? Dubious about supplements? The Well desk wants to help.

ADVERTISEMENT

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let's celebrate the tiny victories.

I played "truth or dare" for a solid 45 minutes with my 5-year-old while cooking dinner. She had a blast "daring" to count the number of steps in our home, setting the table and making a card for her dad. We both enjoyed learning truths about each other. — Linnae Kendall, Marshall, Mich.

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for NYT Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018