2021年5月28日 星期五

The Daily: Where’s Michael?

We explain why we've had so many guest hosts lately, and introduce you to one of them.

You've probably noticed something different about The Daily over the past few weeks.

There are new hosts. Several of them, actually. What gives?

Here's the back story: My wife and I had a baby, so for the next few months, I won't be working every day, giving you a chance to hear from a broader set of voices on the show — colleagues (and frequent guests) like the political correspondent Astead Herndon, the national correspondent Sabrina Tavernise and the technology columnist Kevin Roose.

I'm not going anywhere — I'll still be hosting the show several days a week and telling you, in a weirdly inflected way, what else you need to know today.

And over the coming weeks, in this newsletter, I'll introduce you to our guest hosts by asking them the kind of questions I'd ask anyone on the show.

Today, we're starting with Astead, a reporter whose work I've admired for years.

Astead's answer to my Olive Garden concern? "Only on never-ending pasta week," he said. "That's legit."Michael Barbaro

Michael: So Astead, within your aggressively Midwestern, not-quite-al-dente-pasta-loving world growing up, what were your early journalistic influences? Who did you read or watch and say to yourself, oh, I want to be THAT person!

Astead: I read The Chicago Tribune growing up, but mostly for the sports section. Early sports columnists were really my first introduction to the profession — particularly those who covered the Chicago Bulls and the N.B.A. In high school, I joined the school newspaper and had a column called "Get in Astead's Head," where I wrote about expensive prom costs and candy sales and other important issues. But when I went to college I thought I wanted to work in politics — particularly as a speechwriter — not write about politics.

Michael: OK, I'll bite.

Please give me a sample line from "Get in Astead's Head."

Astead: LOL — I'm not sure I have a sample line on hand. And looking it up would be really, really embarrassing. I will say I asked my high school girlfriend to the prom using the column. We made a graphic of us both in formal clothing and it was a huge success.

Michael: Bravo.

So you wanted to be a political participant, not just an observer? Did that ever happen?

Astead: That was the plan. But I really hated political science classes and the small interactions I had with political campaigns during my freshman year. I switched to become a journalism major, but the big change for me was doing AmeriCorps and teaching small groups of kids on the north side of Milwaukee. And that led to an education reporting internship that I loved at The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. It merged the journalism I knew from sportsland with the social issues I cared about.

ADVERTISEMENT

Michael: Ah. So that feels like a pretty pivotal moment — you start to see journalism as a kind of social good?

Astead: Yeah! And the experience in the newsroom was way different than the one I had in class. I felt like journalism classes were sterile, and that they were teaching us that being dispassionate was a requirement for success. At The Journal Sentinel, that wasn't true. I met so many people who cared a lot about their beats and about systemic injustice. Journalism was a way to speak truth to that — in a way that's more cleareyed than campaigns or political parties.

I've talked about this on The Daily before, but my father is a pastor. Basically I think I needed a job that felt like a vocation in that way, and journalism started to fulfill that.

Michael: Gotcha.

You make your way to Boston, which I swear is not me trying to get you to tell the story of The Bribe. But could you, in brief?

Astead: I appreciate you teeing this up!

I had an internship at The Boston Globe after college that turned into a full-time gig. And that first year I was a general assignment reporter that really focused on local crime, politics and just the news of the day. The story you're referring to was one day at an arraignment I was assigned to cover an alleged real estate scammer. At the courthouse, the alleged scammer's father offered me $10,000 to leave the building and not write the story.

ADVERTISEMENT

I refused and we wrote a two-part series about the family's history of real estate fraud that ended with an attorney general investigation.

Michael: Now that's turning lemons into lemonade! And I have to say that's an extraordinary sum of money to NOT do something!

Astead: If he had the editor that I had at the time, he would know 10k was not enough to incur his wrath.

Michael: LOL. So, hosting! You've been doing it for a few weeks, marvelously. How has that been, to go from guest to host? Weird? Wonderful? Both?

ADVERTISEMENT

Astead: There is a real difference between hosting and guest, and I think as a host I've learned to appreciate different ways to influence an episode. It's not YOUR thoughts or YOUR ideas, but I've learned to take real pride in talking to reporters and making them feel comfortable in a medium that can be hard (in the same way you helped me when I was first going on).

I've also just come to appreciate the extreme work ethic of The Daily team. You are juggling multiple topics at once, and for me there's a real fun in talking about things that aren't politics.

Michael: It's a pretty amazing team.

Astead: My favorite part, to be honest, is talking to reporters who I didn't know across the NYT newsroom. People like Jan Hoffman and Coral Davenport were bylines I knew and enjoyed, but connecting with them to do an episode really helps you feel like an ambassador for the newsroom. That's been the most unexpected joy.

Michael: Well, on behalf of everyone on our team, I want to thank you for being so game to work with us and humbly ask that you keep doing it, with your permission.

Astead: Offer accepted! I'm really excited.

Michael: Thanks, Astead.

(And that's a wrap!)

Astead: This was fun!

Talk to Michael and Astead on Twitter: @mikiebarb and @AsteadWesley. And check out this throwback of Astead doing his version of car pool karaoke to Beyoncé's "Irreplaceable."

Introducing: Day X

Franco A. in his basement in Offenbach, Germany.Laetitia Vancon for The New York Times

A few years ago, a worker at the Vienna airport came across an old black pistol in the bathroom. A police sting operation revealed that the weapon belonged to an officer in the German military, known as Franco A. His story, however, would turn out to be darker and stranger than it first appeared — and part of an alleged far-right assassination plot to bring down the German government.

This is the story we tell in our new series, Day X, hosted by The Times's Berlin bureau chief, Katrin Bennhold.

Over five episodes, Katrin and the producers Lynsea Garrison, Clare Toeniskoetter and Kaitlin Roberts attempt to pick at a nationwide network of far-right extremism within Germany's police and military. Some have called it a shadow army, a loaded phrase that evokes the nation's dark past. Now, Katrin explains why this moment isn't just a reckoning for Germany, but instead raises a question that democracies across the world are waking up to: What happens if the threat is coming from within?

The music in this series was composed by Hauschka, an Oscar-nominated German composer and pianist. You can check out his website here.

You can expect to hear more of the series on Thursdays at nytimes.com/dayx or every Friday for the next month on The Daily feed.

The Daily, Live: Meet the people behind the Odessa series

This year, we followed one Texas high school's reopening during the pandemic. But where are those teachers and students now? And what lies ahead? Join Michael Barbaro and The Daily team as we catch up with them and mark the end of a school year like no other in Odessa. Times subscribers can R.S.V.P. for this free event on June 10 at 6 p.m. Eastern.

On The Daily this week

Monday: Could an investigation into financial misconduct be the undoing of America's most powerful gun rights group?

Tuesday: The story behind one of the most important student free speech cases before the Supreme Court in half a century.

Wednesday: A look inside the origins of Hamas.

Thursday: Why the leader of Belarus forced a commercial airplane to land in an effort to arrest a journalist.

That's it for The Daily newsletter. See you next week.

Have thoughts about the show? Tell us what you think at thedaily@nytimes.com.

Were you forwarded this newsletter? Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox.

Love podcasts? Join The New York Times Podcast Club on Facebook.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for The Daily from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

On Tech: Facebook takes on superspreaders

Internet companies are making it harder for those with big followings to spread misinformation. Finally!

Facebook takes on superspreaders

Jinhwa Oh

Hello, friends! On Tech will not publish on Monday for the Memorial Day holiday.

Big internet companies are finally taking misinformation "superspreaders" seriously. (All it took was a global health crisis and the great lie of a rigged election.)

I've written about influential people, including former President Donald J. Trump, who have been instrumental in spreading false information online about important topics like election integrity and vaccine safety. Some of those same people have repeatedly twisted our beliefs — and internet companies have largely given them a pass.

Let's dig into why habitual misinformation peddlers matter and how internet companies have begun to focus on them — including the new rules put in place by Facebook this week.

Facebook, Twitter and YouTube deserve credit for beginning to target repeat misinformation offenders. But I also want people to be aware of the limits of the companies' actions and to understand the challenge of applying these policies fairly and transparently.

How big of a problem are people who repeatedly post untrue things?

A lot of stuff that people say online isn't necessarily true or untrue. We want room for the messy middle. The concern is when information is outright false, and we know that some of the same people are responsible for amplifying that misinformation again and again.

ADVERTISEMENT

Last fall, a coalition of misinformation researchers found that about half of all retweets related to multiple and widely spread false claims of election interference could be traced back to just 35 Twitter accounts, including those of Mr. Trump and the conservative activist Charlie Kirk. A research group recently identified the accounts of about a dozen people, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who repeatedly — sometimes for years — pushed discredited information about vaccines or, more recently, false "cures" for Covid-19.

Until recently, it mostly didn't matter whether someone posted junk health information or a false election conspiracy theory once or 100 times, or whether the person was Justin Bieber or your cousin with five Facebook followers. Internet companies typically assessed the substance of each message only in isolation. That made no sense.

How policies are starting to focus on these habitual offenders

The riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 showed the danger of falsehoods repeatedly uttered to a public inclined to believe them. Internet companies began to address the outsize influence of people with large followings who habitually spread false information.

ADVERTISEMENT

Facebook on Wednesday said that it would apply stricter punishments on individual accounts that repeatedly post things that the company's fact checkers have deemed misleading or untrue. Posts from habitual offenders will be circulated less in Facebook's news feed, which means that others are less likely to see them. In March, it enacted a similar policy for Facebook groups.

Twitter a couple of months ago created a "five strikes" system in which it escalates punishments for those who tweet misinformation about coronavirus vaccines. Internet companies have suspended accounts of some of the repeat offenders, including Kennedy's.

It's too soon to assess whether these policies are effectively reducing the spread of some outright false information, But it's worthwhile to end the impunity for people who habitually peddle discredited information.

Here's where it gets tricky

Determining fact from fiction can be challenging. Facebook had barred people from posting about the theory that Covid-19 might have originated in a Chinese laboratory. That idea, once considered a conspiracy theory, is now being taken more seriously. Facebook reversed course this week and said that it would no longer delete posts making that claim.

ADVERTISEMENT

Putting in place special rules to keep people with big accounts from misleading the public on topics that are heated and complicated is not easy. But as the Capitol riot shows, the sites have to figure this out.

Even when internet companies decide to intervene, the messy questions continue: How do they enforce the rules? Are they applied fairly? (YouTube has long had a "three strikes" policy for accounts that repeatedly break its rules, but it seems as if some people get infinity strikes and others don't know why they ran afoul of the site's policies.)

Internet companies aren't responsible for the ugliness of humanity. But Facebook, Twitter and YouTube for too long didn't take seriously enough the impact of people with influence repeatedly blaring dangerous misinformation. We should be glad that they're finally taking stronger action.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

Before we go …

  • Cyberattacks are everywhere: Hackers linked to Russia's main intelligence agency appear to have taken over an email system used by the State Department's international aid agency to tunnel into the computer networks of organizations that have been critical of President Vladimir Putin. My colleagues David E. Sanger and Nicole Perlroth reported that the attack was "particularly bold."
  • "Don't stop mentioning reward for the next seven minutes." Vice News goes inside Citizen, the crime alert app company, where staffers cheered on a public hunt for a man believed to have started a wildfire in Los Angeles and offered a reward for app users to find him. It turned out that the man was innocent. (There is profane language in the article.)
  • Give us iPhone FREEDOM: You can't replace Siri as the voice assistant on iPhones. Data can't be backed up to anything other than Apple's iCloud. And you can't buy a Kindle book directly from an app. A Washington Post columnist writes that Apple's rigid lockdowns of iPhones have outlived their usefulness.

Hugs to this

During the pandemic, Frank Maglio started posting videos of himself playing classic rock songs, with his parrot named Tico "singing" along. These two are very talented. There's more on YouTube. (Thanks to our DealBook editor, Jason Karaian, for spotting this duo.)

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here. You can also read past On Tech columns.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018