2021年6月9日 星期三

Introverts Vs. Extroverts, a Family Feud

Please don't make me stay at that party.

Introverts Vs. Extroverts, a Family Feud

Sarah Mazzetti

My husband has long had a greater appetite for socializing than I do; this was a semi-frequent clash of ours before the pandemic that was papered over during quarantine because nobody could go anywhere. It would come out in small ways as we were working in the same limited space (my husband likes to chat during the workday; I like to bury my face in a computer in a silent room), but mostly my preferences won out.

Now that we're re-emerging into the world, the clash is back, and I realize it also extends to our children. Our little one is more like my husband, while our older daughter is more like me. She and I don't mind seeing people, though sometimes we need to be coaxed into socializing — and always require downtime to recharge. The more extroverted pair can be endlessly out and about, with less recharging needed. None of us is at the extremes of introversion or extroversion, but there is tension when we're trying to figure out family activities.

When I started talking to experts about how to navigate our differences, the first thing I learned is that not everyone agrees on the definitions of "introvert" and "extrovert," and it's essential to define terms if you're going to assess your own family dynamics. Kenneth Rubin, a professor of human development at the University of Maryland, who has been studying social withdrawal for decades, said that "people throw around terms like 'shyness,' or 'introversion,' or 'preference for solitude,' or 'social anxiety' into one big box, when in fact they're all rather different."

Shyness is being reticent in social company. With preschoolers, Dr. Rubin said, shyness is based on a fear of the unknown; with older children and adults, it is based on the fear of being judged. Social anxiety is "shyness on steroids," as Melinda Wenner Moyer put it in our guide on how to deal with shy children. "It's a diagnosable disorder characterized by a fear of being watched and judged by others that is so intense and persistent that it disrupts daily life," she wrote.

ADVERTISEMENT

Introversion is a preference for solitude, and is sometimes defined as losing energy from social situations, while extroversion is gaining energy from social situations. "I really like energy as a shorthand for talking about the whole thing," said Susan Cain, the author of "Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking." "I tell people to imagine themselves with company they're truly enjoying and think about how they feel at about the two-to-three hour mark. As an extrovert, you're wishing for the party to last. As an introvert, no matter how socially skilled you are, you do start to feel like your battery is drained and you need to recharge." This definition resonated with me — after about two hours of socializing it's like a switch flips inside me and I need to take a break from people, even if it's just five minutes in the bathroom silently staring at my phone.

So how do you figure out whether your family members are shy or introverted, and how do you make sure everyone gets what they need, socially speaking? Here are some tips.

Figure out each family member's preferences. For kids, start by observing them when they're interacting with others. If they are anxious or disoriented at the playground — always sticking to the periphery instead of jumping into the fray, no matter how long you're there — they may be shy, Dr. Rubin said. If, like my older daughter, they need a lot of coaxing to leave the house, but enjoy engaging once they're in an activity, they are likely introverted.

For adults, ask yourself this question, said Ms. Cain: "Imagine if you had an entire weekend to yourself with no social, family, professional obligations. How would you spend your time?" The answer will reveal how much you really enjoy socializing and how much feels obligatory.

ADVERTISEMENT

Working to understand everyone's natures and preferences through observation and discussion may seem obvious, but "it's not obvious at all," Ms. Cain said. "Most families have unspoken, unrealized expectations about what is the right way to be," she said. So if you are an introvert in an extroverted family, or vice-versa, your needs may be overlooked or misunderstood.

Discuss plans beforehand. Having discussions about weekend activities you might do as a family and letting everyone voice opinions is essential, said Kristine Nicolini, an assistant professor in the journalism department at the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, who wrote her dissertation on introversion and family communication dynamics. You might agree to do two social things on a Saturday, but schedule down time in between play dates and barbecues.

It's also worth being aware of the family dynamics when you're socializing, Dr. Nicolini said. Extroverted family members can invite their more introverted siblings or spouses into conversations to make sure they feel included, she said.

Divide and conquer. Doing different activities to satisfy introverts and extroverts some of the time may help get everyone what they need, Ms. Cain said. My husband might take my younger daughter out to her favorite park, while my older daughter and I will stay home and putter and read. Everyone is happy. With us as a couple, my husband will see friends after the kids are in bed, while I stay home and watch TV and fold laundry. We are both living our best lives.

ADVERTISEMENT

That doesn't mean we always avoid conflict. Leisure time, especially when we get to go out together without our children, is a zero sum game. I prefer to spend this leisure time just the two of us, while he prefers hanging out with a larger group.

Sometimes we compromise by going out to dinner alone and then meeting friends later. Sometimes I head home before my husband, but am mildly annoyed about it. In a weird way, the pandemic has made me grateful to be back to these old irritations; I find them comforting, like a scratchy old blanket. I'm just so glad we can socialize again at all.

Want More on Introversion and Extroversion?

  • This article was inspired by a conversation between an introvert and an extrovert at The Atlantic. It is about how friends with different socializing preferences can manage their post-pandemic relationships
  • As more and more folks return to offices, that transition may be tough on introverts who prefer to work from home. Morra Aarons-Mele has a guide to surviving at work for the solitude lovers among us.
  • Father's Day is coming up, and Jancee Dunn has a wonderful piece about why the greatest gift you could give a dad may be alone time.
SUBSCRIBE TODAY

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let's celebrate the tiny victories.

My almost 3-year-old was being highly uncooperative with getting out the door in the morning. Now she rushes to get her coat on when I invite the cat to take her place at day care! — Michelle Woznick, Buffalo, N.Y.

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for NYT Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

2021年6月8日 星期二

Policy in a time of political madness

When bad things happen to good governments.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen (top right) and other finance chiefs attending the first day of the Group of 7 finance ministers meeting in London on June 4.Stefan Rousseau/Agence France-Presse, via Pool/Afp Via Getty Images
Author Headshot

By Paul Krugman

Opinion Columnist

Warning: Today's newsletter will be kind of meta. It's a meditation on what people like me, and more important, fine public servants like Janet Yellen, are even doing in an era when malign insanity seems all too likely to swallow our nation.

Today's column was about Yellen's impressive achievement in getting Group of 7 governments to agree in principle to new rules that should greatly reduce the ability of multinational corporations to avoid taxes. It's really good stuff, a model of both good economic policy and effective economic diplomacy. It points the way to a potential future of greater policy fairness and more resources available to deal with society's needs.

But will that potential future materialize? What if by 2025 America is back in the hands of Trumpists — either Donald Trump himself or someone who managed to gain the Republican nomination by emulating all his worst qualities? Clearly this could happen — not just because voters might choose a Trumpist, or because the Electoral College might deliver the White House to the popular-vote loser as it did in 2016 (and almost did in 2020), but because Republican states might simply declare Trump or his stand-in the winner no matter what the voters say.

ADVERTISEMENT

Anyone paying attention to national affairs knows that a nightmarish outcome that might mean the end of American democracy is all too possible. So what's a public servant — or, vastly less important, but relevant to yours truly, an economist/pundit whose beat is public policy — supposed to do? Is there even any point in advocating for and implementing good policy?

There are two facile answers. One of them is that governments can reap political rewards for good policy if they try hard enough to explain to voters what they're doing. The other is that good policy will lead to good outcomes, and in a democracy voters will reward success.

Both of these strike me as political equivalents of "do what you love, the money will follow" — which is, of course, terrible advice for most people, who must do jobs they don't especially love if they want to make a decent living.

I mean, policymakers and those who follow policy should do their best to explain what they're doing in ways large numbers of people can understand; to a large extent that's basically my job at The Times (which, I have to admit, I love. Do as I say, not as I do). But I also write a lot about the persistence of zombie ideas that should have died long ago in the face of logic and evidence, but keep shambling around. Many of us do our best to kill these zombies or at least limit their spread, but their persistence bodes ill for the ability of even the clearest explanation of policy to break through to a mass audience.

ADVERTISEMENT

Oh, and 23 percent of Republicans believe that the world is controlled by Satan-worshipping pedophiles. Can we talk to such people about international tax policy? OK, most people aren't that out of it. But serious political scientists find that voting behavior mainly reflects social identities and partisan loyalties, not issues.

As for voters rewarding successful policy, to the extent that the economy affects elections, that effect seems to come mainly from short-term performance — how fast the economy is growing in the year or less before the election — which has very little to do with the overall quality of policy, and may not be much affected by policy at all. Add to this the real chance that what voters want may not even matter in 2024.

So is there any point in even arguing for good policies? Yes, so long as you don't have illusions about saving the world. The detective novelist Raymond Chandler published a wonderful essay about writing, "The Simple Art of Murder," in which he argued among other things that no matter how important your theme, what mattered was what you could do with it: "Some very dull books have been written about God, and some very fine ones about how to make a living and stay fairly honest."

The point is that there are many people trying to save democracy, and rightly so. But meanwhile things like tax policy must be made, and it's still important that we try to do it right.

ADVERTISEMENT

And I might add a speculation, which political scientists should feel free to mock. I suspect, or at least hope, that while the specifics of policy have very little political effect, a general sense of competence may bring political rewards — perhaps especially after the clown show of the past four years.

So I guess we should all do the best we can, even though you have to be oblivious not to realize that political catastrophe may overtake everyone's best efforts.

Programming note: The newsletter will be off next week. After the hiatus, it will be back in your inbox on June 22.

Quick Hits

The economy affects elections.

But it's mostly just the very recent rate of growth.

Which mainly reflects policy by the Fed, not the president.

Election theft: not a fantasy anymore.

LISTEN: Narratives of the American economy often focus on employers. What would change if they were to focus on workers? On today's episode of The Ezra Klein Show, the policy scholar Jamila Michener discusses the American economy's trenchant reliance on poverty, the potential and limitations of universal basic income, and the political disenfranchisement of the poor. You can listen to the episode here.

Feedback
If you're enjoying what you're reading, please consider recommending it to friends. They can sign up here. If you want to share your thoughts on an item in this week's newsletter or on the newsletter in general, please email me at krugman-newsletter@nytimes.com.

Facing the Music

Music makes it more OK, anyway.YouTube

OK is too much to ask; better, maybe.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

New York Times Opinion highlights a range of perspectives and voices. This work is made possible with the support of subscribers. Please consider supporting The Times with this special offer.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Paul Krugman from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018