2021年6月17日 星期四

On Tech: China isn’t the issue. Big Tech is.

Don't be distracted by the fear mongering.

China isn't the issue. Big Tech is.

David Szakaly

We need to have a vigorous debate about what Americans might gain or lose if government officials succeed in forcing changes to technology services and companies as we know them.

One thing that's standing in the way of such a debate is fear mongering by tech companies and their allies. They tend to decry anything that might alter how Big Tech operates as somehow helping China win the future. It's an intellectually dishonest tactic and a distraction from important questions about our future. It bugs the heck out of me.

What prompted my eye rolling was how tech companies have responded to a recent flurry of activity that could profoundly alter life for America's tech superstars, and all of us who are affected by their products. Several Democrats in Congress have proposed new laws to crack down on big technology companies. And the new chair of the Federal Trade Commission, Lina Khan, has advocated for aggressive enforcement of monopoly laws to stop what she sees as big tech companies preying on consumers.

Those steps could unravel the status quo in technology, or not. We're in a messy phase that makes it tricky to predict what Congress, states, courts and government enforcers might do to change the rules for tech companies — and whether it will do more good than harm.

PAID POST: A MESSAGE FROM Deloitte

Women in AI

Despite the surging demand for AI, at least one talent pool that could help businesses achieve their AI ambitions has remained largely untapped — women. This report from The Deloitte AI Institute discusses the state of women in AI, why gender diversity matters and steps your organization can take to enable a more diverse workforce. Read leadership perspectives from top women in AI and chart a path forward.

Learn More

But powerful corporations and people who support them aren't grappling with the nuances. Publicly at least, they have responded as they often do, by essentially implying that guardrails on some U.S. technology companies create the conditions for China to take over the world. Somehow. Don't ask how.

Here's what an official at NetChoice, a group that represents Google, Facebook and Amazon, told The Washington Post about the crop of Big Tech regulation bills: "At the same time Congress is looking to boost American innovation and cybersecurity, lawmakers should not pass legislation that would cede ground to foreign competitors and open up American data to dangerous and untrustworthy actors."

And this is what the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a policy group that gets funding from telecommunications and tech companies, said this week about the appointment of Khan as F.T.C. chair: "In a time of increased global competition, antitrust populism will cause lasting self-inflicted damage that benefits foreign, less meritorious rivals."

Sounds bad! You might notice that these statements don't name China, which is the magic word to make stuff happen in Washington. But that's what they mean by referencing unnamed foreign rivals.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yes, it's reasonable for Americans to want strong U.S. companies in a competitive global economy. But making a handful of tech kings play fair isn't likely to break them.

As for the security arguments, the logic doesn't work if you think about it for more than two seconds. Does preventing Amazon from selling its own brand of batteries — as one congressional bill might do — hold America back from fighting foreign cyberattacks? Nope. How do proposals that might restrain giant companies from doing whatever they want with our personal information weaken America on the world stage? They do not.

There are absolutely legitimate concerns about China shaping global technology or online conversations in ways that clash with America's values and interests. It's right to be concerned about China's participation in swiping America's secrets. That has almost nothing to do with whether Americans would be better off if Facebook were prohibited from buying the next Instagram or whether Apple shouldn't be able to give a leg up to its fitness and music services on iPhones.

Restraining U.S. corporate powers from enriching themselves at the expense of Americans doesn't weaken the country's ability to restrain abuses by China or support competitive U.S. companies. We can do all of it.

ADVERTISEMENT

I get worked up about tech lobbyists' policy statements because I fear that they're a sign of tech superpowers' refusal to engage in essential debates about the future.

Remember that behind the chaotic attempts in Washington and beyond to reimagine how these companies operate are meaty questions about technology in our lives: Would we have more control over our personal information, better shopping services and a more fair economy if Big Tech wasn't so big or if there were more rules about how the companies operate? And how do we limit what we think are downsides from those companies without ruining what we think is helpful?

Those are the kinds of questions that policymakers are wrestling with, and they're difficult ones. Everyone needs to be involved, including the tech companies that might be affected by new rules. That's why tech companies do themselves and the public a disservice by distracting us with glib talking points.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

ADVERTISEMENT

TIP OF THE WEEK

What to do on Amazon's Prime Day

Prime Day, an online shopping holiday invented by Amazon, will be this Monday and Tuesday. (Yes, Prime Day refuses to be confined to 24 hours.) Our New York Times personal technology columnist, Brian X. Chen, has suggestions on what to consider buying and what to avoid.

The first rule of Prime Day: Most deals promoted during annual shopping bonanzas like this aren't great deals at all.

It's not unusual to see discounts on products that hardly anyone wanted to buy. (Imagine the clearance section of a Sur La Table.) And for more desirable items, the discounts sometimes aren't as steep as they have been other times of the year.

My rule of thumb for faux shopping holidays is to skip what any company describes as a "sales" section. Instead, jot down a list of items you are eager to buy and check to see if they're available at lower prices during the shopping event.

To see if you're getting a good deal, you can use price tracking tools like Camel Camel Camel, which shows the price history for a product listed on Amazon. Our product recommendation site, Wirecutter, will also be scouring Amazon and other retail sites during Prime Day to unearth the truly good deals — stay tuned on its deals page and read more of its tips.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

Before we go …

  • She went from being an outsider to the boss: As a law student in 2017, Lina Khan published a scholarly article that helped sway many Washington power brokers to more aggressively regulate technology giants under antitrust laws. My colleagues David McCabe and Cecilia Kang write that in her new job as chair of the Federal Trade Commission, Khan may find it tough to put her ideas into action.
  • "Do you guys understand who Xi Jinping is?" Doug Guthrie believed in China's economic potential, and Apple hired him to help the company navigate the country. My colleague Jack Nicas writes that Guthrie's views evolved and that he came to believe that Apple's reliance on China made the company vulnerable to government-imposed compromises that undercut its values.
  • Are you ready for ads in virtual reality? Too bad. Facebook said that it was testing ads that pop up in people's field of view when they use Oculus, the company's virtual reality goggles. (Facebook does, after all, make 97 percent of its revenue from selling ads.)

Hugs to this

Would you describe a moray eel as cute? Maybe? Researchers caught a moray eating on land, using a special set of jaws. Most fish need water to feed. Also it took the researchers more than five years to train the morays to eat this way. (I spotted this in the Today in Tabs newsletter.)

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here. You can also read past On Tech columns.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

2021年6月16日 星期三

The T List: Five things we recommend this week

An exhibition of work by Hurvin Anderson, silk scarves from Como — and more.

Welcome to the T List, a newsletter from the editors of T Magazine. Each week, we share things we're eating, wearing, listening to or coveting now. Sign up here to find us in your inbox every Wednesday. And you can always reach us at tlist@nytimes.com.

SEE THIS

Scenes of Jamaica, Painted by Hurvin Anderson

From left: Hurvin Anderson's "Jungle Garden" (2020) and "Flat Top" (2008).© Hurvin Anderson. Courtesy of the artist and Thomas Dane Gallery. Photos (from left): Richard Ivey; Hugh Kelly

By Megan O'Grady

T Writer at Large

ADVERTISEMENT

The British artist Hurvin Anderson is best known for his "Barbershop" series — colorful, nearly abstract paintings inspired by the parlors he visited with his father as a child — which earned him a nomination for the Turner Prize in 2017. His new show at the Arts Club of Chicago pairs a handful of these works with newer paintings made after a trip Anderson took to Jamaica, where much of his family is from, four years ago. These works depict the lush Jamaican landscape: Eruptions of foliage are rendered in shades of emerald and avocado, marigold and fuchsia, and envelop abandoned-looking structures of concrete and limestone — modern ruins hidden behind jungly overgrowth. Anderson, the youngest of eight children, was born in Birmingham (he now lives in London) and grew up listening to his family reminisce about their lives in the Caribbean before they moved to England in the 1960s. The exhibition's title, "Anywhere but Nowhere," was lifted from the Jamaican musical artist K.C. White's 1973 hit, and provides an emotional through-line, suggesting the longing and loss that keeps certain geographies alive in us, elusive havens of memory and imagination that, over time, become almost mythical. "Anywhere but Nowhere" is on view at the Arts Club of Chicago through August 7, 201 East Ontario Street, Chicago, artsclubchicago.org.

BUY THIS

Summery Scarves Made in Como, Italy

From left: M. Finley's Camille and Violette scarves.Bono Melendrez

By Angelina Venezia

T Contributor

In these scorching summer months, accessorizing can be a challenge, which is why the recent launch of M. Finley — a line of silk scarves produced in Como, Italy — by the artist Meghann Stephenson is particularly exciting. Having noticed that existing brands weren't making scarves that befit her style, Stephenson saw an opportunity to create her own: Think Hermès but with a palette and aesthetic influenced by, Stephenson says, "California's poppy super blooms and the color field paintings" of the 1950s and '60s, along with the art of Ellsworth Kelly and Katrin Bremermann. The line comprises four delicate patterns in sumptuous swirls of mauve, burnt orange, pale pink and soft white that are perfect for any season. Like Stephenson says, M. Finley scarves infuse any outfit with "playfulness, intrigue and glamour." $96, mfinleystudio.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

READ THIS

5 Books That Celebrate Emerging Artists

The inaugural set of books from Just an Idea.Yorgo & Co.

By Mimi Vu

T Contributor

When the Parisian concept shop Colette closed its doors in 2017, its co-founder and creative director, Sarah Andelman, launched a new project called Just an Idea. Its aim, says Andelman — who is known for championing emerging innovators, from a young Virgil Abloh to Shayne Oliver of Hood By Air — is to "introduce talents from around the world and to give them support to present their work." To that end, Just an Idea facilitates collaborations between big brands and fledgling designers. And it has recently ventured into the world of publishing, issuing a set of five books that each explore the vision of a different creative. The fashion designer Nicole McLaughlin, for example, transforms discarded clothing and objects into sculptural garments — from chunky shoes made of tennis balls to vests stitched together from Ziploc bags — while the Parisian florist and former art dealer Louis-Géraud Castor creates sublime floral compositions that explore the poetic shapes and forms of the botanical world. Other creatives highlighted in the collection are the novelist and artist Douglas Coupland, the Sydney-based illustrator and sneaker collector Eric Ng and the graphic designer Sho Shibuya. Andelman plans to release two sets of these books per year: "They're like a visual portfolio for each artist," she says. About $60, justanidea.com.

COVET THIS

More Than a Bench

The F04 Table Bench from Simon Barazin.Ido Adan

By Gisela Williams

T Contributing Editor

ADVERTISMENT

For the Tel Aviv-based architect Simon Barazin, the past year has been one of change. Tired of designing big commercial high-rises, he quit his firm to start his own small studio, which focuses on interiors and furniture. His most recent project, which he developed alongside graphic designers Tal Baltuch and Tom Melnick, started with a simple need: a bench that would double as a table for their shared work space. But the limited-edition F04 Bench is more than just a piece of furniture: It's also somewhat of an optical illusion. At nearly four feet long, the object is made from translucent panes of treated plexiglass (a material that reflects and refracts surrounding light) so that it emits a spectrum of technicolored shadows. Barazin — whose work plays with this idea of what's real and what isn't — is also releasing an NFT version of the piece later this year. About $2,500, simonbarazin.com.

WEAR THIS

Beachwear for the Bold

Adam Selman's Sandbar bikini top and Synchronized bikini bottom.Adam Selman

By Sean Caley Newcott

T Contributor

The designer Adam Selman isn't afraid to experiment with cut or color: His sporty yet flirty athletic wear, from his namesake label, is made with confident women in mind. So it felt like a natural extension of the brand when he debuted a swimwear collection that promises to outfit those looking forward to what the designer himself hopes to be a "wild summer." The line, which features a variety of styles — from plunging cutaway one-pieces to sporty scoop-neck bikini tops and high-waisted bottoms — comes in bright, punchy hues as well as dazzling patterns, and also includes beach towels, totes and a zipper pouch. Without sacrificing design for support or comfort, the suits are made from recycled nylon and spandex and designed with different body shapes and shades in mind. (An accessories collection of cover-ups and hats is also in the works.) "Adam Selman Swim is not for wallflowers," says the designer. "It's made for women who want to stand out." From $60, adamselman.com.

FROM T'S INSTAGRAM

The Visual Artists Inspired by 'Invisible Man'

Gordon Parks's "The Invisible Man, Harlem, New York" (1952).© The Gordon Parks Foundation

In 1952, the photographer Gordon Parks worked with Ralph Ellison to translate the writer's novel, "Invisible Man," published earlier that year, into a series of images for Life magazine. One of the photographs depicts the book's nameless narrator in his retreat beneath the city, amid the 1,369 light bulbs that, he tells the reader, "illuminated the blackness of my invisibility." In Parks's photograph, the lights are arrayed on the walls behind the figure in a modernist and rhythmic arrangement that reads as an extension of the music emanating from his two turntables (presumably Louis Armstrong, whom the narrator listens to while eating vanilla ice cream and sloe gin). The world up above — represented by tiny lights nearly swallowed up by the night — barely exists by comparison. This sort of creative overlap wasn't unusual for Ellison, who occasionally worked as a photographer himself, was steeped in the arts of his day — and whose novel proved to be a potent source of inspiration for a wide variety of artists. To read Nicole Rudick's full essay on how "Invisible Man" has influenced not just writers but photographers, sculptors and painters all grappling with what it means to be seen, visit tmagazine.com — and follow us on Instagram.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for The T List from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018