2021年7月14日 星期三

‘Mommy Brain’ Is Real

How to deal with forgetfulness, and embrace your mind's new 'superpowers.'

'Mommy Brain' Is Real

Jam Dong

I've been playing a not-so-fun guessing game lately: Is my inability to form a coherent thought a result of pandemic fogginess or "mommy brain"?

Like many other vaccinated adults, I've been dipping my toe back into being social again. But on top of having spent a year-plus largely at home, I'm also adapting to motherhood after having my first child in October.

As I gather once more with friends and relatives, I often find myself pausing in the middle of a story because a word has completely escaped me. The other day, I was trying to describe a mask I saw someone wearing but couldn't remember the word for "fabric." I frantically waved my hands across my face and finally landed on "pattern covering" as a close-enough substitute.

I'm not alone: I've heard from new moms who forgot words for the washing machine ("dishwasher for clothes"), subtraction ("reverse math"), and thirsty ("water hungry"). These slip-ups are, admittedly, funny. But they can be concerning, too. What happened to our minds?

I decided to reach out to some experts for answers, starting with Abigail Tucker, the author of "Mom Genes: Inside the New Science of Our Ancient Maternal Instinct." Ms. Tucker, a science writer and mother of four, has found that "mommy brain" isn't just a figment of our imaginations.

"The hormones of pregnancy, childbirth and breastfeeding prompt a host of genetic changes that ultimately shift our brain architecture," Ms. Tucker said. She noted that while we give a lot of attention to the physical changes of pregnancy, "there's also a kind of metamorphosis that invisibly happens inside of us."

ADVERTISEMENT

Studies have shown that pregnancy results in a loss of gray matter in mothers' brain areas involved in social cognition. Or, as Ms. Tucker put it: "Scientists have found that moms have trouble with verbal recall and the kinds of skills that are in the fancy-pants part of the human brain."

Two of those scientists are Liisa Galea and Cindy Barha, who work at the University of British Columbia.

Dr. Barha told me that while many women are motivated to get back to their pre-pregnancy bodies, it's not possible to return to our pre-pregnancy brains.

"It's a scary thing for people. We don't know a lot about the brain and don't want to think that it might not go back," Dr. Barha said. "But it doesn't need to go back. It shouldn't go back because it's changed. It's evolved."

ADVERTISEMENT

Yes, we might have trouble recalling certain words or remembering the name of an obscure actor, but there are plenty of silver linings to the ways mothers' brains change, Dr. Barha said. The upsides can include a heightened capacity to stay calm and focused during stressful situations, the ability to interpret what different newborn cries mean, and enhanced vigilance around potential dangers.

Ms. Tucker cited a study published in 2016 that found that mothers who showed the biggest drops in gray-matter volume also reported the warmest relationships with their babies. "We're paying attention to this nonverbal creature and are entirely focused on that," Ms. Tucker said.

I hadn't considered that perspective. My baby isn't looking for me to have a robust vocabulary at this stage. She's relying on me for comfort, protection and care — to pick up on her myriad nonverbal cues.

Still, that doesn't mean that mommy brain isn't frustrating or even frightening when it happens. I sometimes worry about how these cognitive changes might impact my work performance and know other mothers who share similar concerns.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr. Galea and Dr. Barha, who both live in Canada, where maternity leave is much longer than the 10-week average in the United States, said those fears are valid. Still, they urge new mothers to try not to worry too much about their cognitive abilities. "I think we need to get away from that idea that these changes are bad," Dr. Galea said. "When you look later on in life, you actually see some really positive changes that occur in terms of memory and in terms of the plasticity of the brain."

In a study published in 2019, Dr. Galea, along with researchers Paula Duarte-Guterman and Benedetta Leuner, discovered that female rodents got better at completing mazes after they weaned their pups, which suggests that, with time, mothers' brains improve. "This is one of the major messages: Our brains actually get better," Dr. Galea said.

In the meantime, though, those brain blips can be maddening.

Samantha Servidio, a 26-year-old single mother in Decatur, Ga., remembers a moment on her way to work when she had gotten her fussy then-5-month-old into his car seat but couldn't get her vehicle to start.

"I kept cranking the ignition and cranking it and cranking it, and couldn't figure out what was happening. Is it my battery? Am I out of gas?" she remembers wondering.

Finally, after calling her partner at the time for help, Ms. Servidio discovered that she was trying to start her car with her iPhone charging cable instead of her keys. "I couldn't believe it," she said. "I don't know why I sat there and fumbled with it for as long as I did."

Ms. Servidio chalks up that blunder to a classic case of mommy brain fueled by sleep deprivation.

Dr. Galea, a mother of two, said that lost sleep plays "a huge role" in mental cognition and that some of the forgetfulness and fogginess that new mothers experience will subside with better shut-eye.

"This time is really a flash in the pan," added Dr. Barha, who has a 2-year-old and an 8-week-old. "Yes, there are brain changes, but you also become more efficient," she added.

For example, a mother's ability to keep track of multiple appointments, schedules, responsibilities and other tasks that require executive functioning is a "superpower" that comes with giving birth, she said.

Whether we're new parents or have been at this for a while, we're all feeling a bit of fogginess as we come out of Covid-lockdown life. Ms. Servidio, whose son will soon turn 3, said she uses her smartwatch and other technologies to help her remember what she might otherwise forget. "Honestly, I would be nowhere without my Google calendar and all of the reminders I set," she told me.

Out of all of the advice and information I heard, there was one bit that stuck with me most. Ms. Tucker reminded me, and all new mothers, to be self-compassionate. Instead of lamenting mommy brain, she suggested trying to embrace it.

"Your body has gone through this literally mind-boggling transformation and your brain has undergone a hidden Renaissance," she said. "You have become a different version of you."

Katie Hawkins-Gaar writes a weekly newsletter called "My Sweet Dumb Brain."

Want More on How Parenthood Affects Our Bodies?

Subscribe Today

We hope you've enjoyed this newsletter, which is made possible through subscriber support. Subscribe to The New York Times with this special offer.

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let's celebrate the tiny victories.

I "taught" my kids that thunder was the sound of two clouds high-fiving one another. I would smack my hands over my head (like a jumping jack) and call out "high five!" It worked so well that they were never afraid of thunder! — Marissa Kalman, Glencoe, Ill.

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/

2021年7月13日 星期二

The deadly triumph of the paranoid style

The crazies were always there, but now they've taken over a whole party.
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, at a news conference in June about her bill to audit the correspondence and financial statements of Dr. Anthony Fauci.Andrew Harnik/Associated Press
Author Headshot

By Paul Krugman

Opinion Columnist

"Vaccination," declared a featured speaker at last weekend's Conservative Political Action Conference, "is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot we have ever had to face." The crowd cheered.

Oh, wait. That wasn't a speech at CPAC; it's a line uttered by General Jack D. Ripper in the Stanley Kubrick movie "Dr. Strangelove," and it was about water fluoridation, not Covid vaccines. (Anti-fluoridation conspiracy theories were a real thing in the 1950s and 1960s.) But Ripper's line wasn't much different from the content of many actual CPAC speeches.

The point is that the madness we're now seeing on the right is, in one sense, nothing new. Richard Hofstadter wrote a famous 1964 essay titled "The Paranoid Style in American Politics," tracing McCarthyism all the way back to the 18th-century panic over the Bavarian Illuminati. As he documented, there has always been a streak in our political psychology that sees elite institutions, from government to education, as secret fronts for a vast global conspiracy.

So if you marvel over Ronny Jackson, the former White House physician, declaring that the Democratic Party of Joe Biden — Joe Biden! — is "socialist Communist Marxist," remember that Robert Welch, founder of the John Birch Society, insisted that Dwight Eisenhower was a "dedicated, conscious agent of the communist conspiracy." And while the Birchers were a fringe faction, they weren't as fringy as all that; if they had been, William F. Buckley wouldn't have felt compelled to spend time trying to excommunicate them from the conservative movement.

ADVERTISEMENT

What's different now, of course, is that bizarre conspiracy theories have become totally mainstream on the right. These days you're excommunicated from the Republican Party if you don't embrace the Big Lie that the election was stolen, don't denounce modestly center-left Democrats as the second coming of Stalin and, increasingly, don't declare that mask mandates are the equivalent of the Holocaust and vaccines are a globalist plot to achieve mind control.

How did that happen?

Most of what I've read emphasizes real changes in American society that have put defenders of traditional order on edge. Our economic center of gravity has shifted away from rural America to big metropolitan areas. Racial diversity has increased, as has social tolerance; religiosity, especially the strength of the white evangelical movement, has declined; we had a Black president. What we're seeing, the story goes, is a backlash against these changes.

And all of these points probably have some validity. But watching things play out, especially since the Jan. 6 putsch, makes me wonder whether we're overthinking this. How much of what's going on is simply group dynamics that have given pre-existing craziness license to express itself?

ADVERTISEMENT

Put it this way: Surely there was always a significant faction of Americans willing to believe in dark conspiracy theories. But they were restrained by a conservative political establishment that considered conspiracy theorizing bad politics and, not incidentally, bad for business. So people who might have been inclined to spout Bircher-type rhetoric weren't just excluded from power; they were inhibited in their willingness to state their views because it would have been bad for their careers.

Then came the elections first of Barack Obama, then of Donald Trump. Neither election changed the fundamentals of American society very much — but they changed things enough to produce a sort of tipping point, giving political paranoia the critical mass it had previously lacked. The crazies no longer felt the need to moderate their tone; on the contrary, they began a sort of arms race, in which they competed to out-crazy one another.

And as far as the incentive to hide one's true views is concerned, the upper hand is now on the other foot. These days it's the sane Republicans who have to adopt protective camouflage, pretending to share the dominant paranoia (and perhaps, people being what they are, starting to believe the crazy themselves).

The result has been a remarkable, and horrifying, transformation of American politics. One of our major political parties has, quite simply, gone mad. This madness will kill thousands of Americans in the next few months, because politics is by far the best predictor of who is still refusing to get vaccinated. But Covid deaths may be only the beginning of the deadly effects of the triumph of the paranoid style.

ADVERTISEMENT

Quick Hits

The strange link between paranoid politics and quack medicine.

The return of "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion."

Before Covid denial, there was the climate hoax.

Kristi Noem, a CPAC star who managed Covid by telling South Dakotans that "personal responsibility was the best answer."

Feedback If you're enjoying what you're reading, please consider recommending it to friends. They can sign up here. If you want to share your thoughts on an item in this week's newsletter or on the newsletter in general, please email me at krugman-newsletter@nytimes.com.

Facing the Music

There is indeed something happening here.YouTube

Paranoia strikes deep.

Subscribe Today

New York Times Opinion curates a wide range of views, inviting rich discussion and debate that helps readers analyze the world. This work is made possible with the support of subscribers. Please consider subscribing to The Times with this special offer.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Paul Krugman from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/