2021年9月1日 星期三

The Secret to Raising a Resilient Kid

The ability to bounce back is more important now than ever; here's how to impart it.

The Secret to Raising a Resilient Kid

By Erik Vance

Joao Fazenda

In my early teens, my dad took myself, my best friend and our neighbor on a grueling backpacking trip connecting California's Yosemite Valley to Half Dome to nearby Clouds Rest mountain and back again.

By the second day — halfway up Clouds Rest, on wobbly legs and besieged by mosquitoes — we finally mutinied. The three of us made it clear to my father that we were done. Nobody had heard of Clouds Rest and nobody had the juice to see the top.

"OK, I understand," I remember Dad saying. "You guys stay here. Erik, let's go."

There was no point arguing. Even today, my only memory of the top of Clouds Rest is the blue sky I saw flat on my back, panting and praying for a speedy death. Later, of course, I described the hike as an epic victory of teenager over nature. Which, I suspect, is why my dad pushed me to do it.

Whether he knew it or not, Dad was a big believer in the concept of resilience, the ability to engage with a challenge, risk or impediment, and come out the other side with some measure of success. It's a psychological principle blending optimism, flexibility, problem-solving and motivation. It's the job you got through pure determination, the game you eked out against a far better team or the mountaintop that made you want to strangle your father. Dad called it "character."

"It is about the ability to bounce back even when times get tough. But that implies it's only about survival," said Dr. Kenneth Ginsburg, a pediatrician and the author of the American Academy of Pediatrics's book "Building Resilience in Children and Teens." "Resilient people not only bounce back, but also thrive in the best of times."

ADVERTISEMENT

Never has resilience — be it physical, mental, emotional or financial — been more important to our society than in the past year and a half, and never have I been so determined to pass it on to my son. He may not climb mountains, but life will always have a disaster, disappointment or pandemic to throw his way. If he can't roll with the punches, his life will be very, very hard.

Thankfully, most experts say resiliency is something that can be fostered, nurtured and developed in children from a very young age. You just have to build a safe foundation, find challenges and watch kids thrive.

Build a stable, safe foundation.

Creating resilience in children isn't just chucking them into the deep end of a pool to see if they can swim, it's about the bedrock of support you give them every day.

"Having a relationship with a caring parent is far and away the most powerful protective factor for children," said Ann Masten, a psychology professor at the University of Minnesota and a pioneer in the study of resiliency in children.

ADVERTISEMENT

Children need to feel they have a stable home base before they can take risks and learn to bounce back. If a child skins her elbow falling off a bike, the best way to help her get back on is to make sure she knows she's loved no matter what.

Dr. Masten said resilience is less a specific trait and more a network of overlapping ones, like flexibility, confidence and even societal supports, like health care and schooling. But the crucial part is that children feel safe and supported. In order to weather a storm, you need a solid shelter.

Model behaviors for your kid.

Part of teaching your child to be resilient is first projecting resilience yourself.

"You're on a plane, there's turbulence — you don't look at the guy next to you who's hysterical," Dr. Ginsburg said. "You look at the flight attendants, to see if they're still serving snack mix."

ADVERTISEMENT

Losing your temper when a child refuses to go to sleep, breaks your grandmother's heirloom teapot or just freaking can't get out the door in the morning, only tells him that it's useful to have a fit when something goes wrong.

It can be hard, especially when you know he's misbehaving, but regulating your own emotions goes a long way to teaching your child to do the same.

"You are always teaching by how you handle things yourself," Dr. Masten said. "What parents do when they get upset, their kids are observing that."

Make the most of small challenges.

If you put the word "resilience" on a poster, it would probably be under a photo of someone climbing a mountain, fighting a forest fire or perhaps tending to patients in a Covid ward. But, in fact, it's the small disappointments or frustrating moments that truly build resilience.

Let's say your child comes home from school with an "F" in math, and you know he didn't work hard on that assignment. Rather than making it clear you think he's lazy, focus on cause and effect — he didn't study and was thus unprepared — and how he can do better next time. Cause and effect can be controlled, and having a sense of control is a core element of resilience.

Help your child stretch herself.

Once a kid feels safe, supported and has a good model of resilience, it's time to challenge her a little.

For Tyler Fish, resilience is a delicate balance between success and failure. Mr. Fish works for the outdoor education company Outward Bound, helping set educational priorities for, say, youth backpacking, dog-sledding or canoeing trips across the world. A 25-year veteran of the company and former instructor, he said that resilience is a principle that helps them change the lives of kids from all kinds of backgrounds.

"It's not just about being tough — that's not resiliency," Mr. Fish said. "It's about doing things that you're not sure you can do. And with other people."

When teaching canoeing, for instance, he starts by putting a kid into a boat to see if she can figure it out. Then, after a little frustration, he gives some instruction and lets her try again. Then he repeats the cycle, so that she can balance success and failure. It's the same for other lessons, like making friends, teamwork or leadership.

"One of the great skills of parenting is knowing how to challenge, when to challenge, how much to challenge," Dr. Masten said. "There's no one right way to foster resilience, just like there's no one right way to parent."

Three weeks ago I had a perfect opportunity to teach resilience to my 5-year-old son. We had reserved a campground in Colorado's Rocky Mountain National Park about four miles from the trailhead. I thought about my dad, and those mornings picking rocks out of oatmeal after two days on the trail.

When we arrived, we learned that the next 48 hours would be plagued with thunderstorms, downpours and even a flood warning. We could trudge for hours through the rain, set up a miserable camp and shiver in the tent to get warm — what a fantastic opportunity to build resilience!

But those treasured trips of my youth, my wife reminded me, were in my teens and our kindergartner just wants to be on vacation with his parents. So we canceled the hike, went to the zoo and spent a night in a nice hotel watching a superhero movie. We'll save the downpour death march for another time. Teaching resilience, it seems, has its limits.

To learn more about coping with kids, Covid and back-to-school, join Tara Parker-Pope, the Times's Well columnist, on Sept. 1 at 2 p.m. E.S.T. for a New York Times Instagram live conversation with Lisa Damour, an adolescent therapist and Times columnist. They'll be taking your questions, sharing the latest science and offering guidance for parents and families navigating the uncertainty of pandemic back-to-school.

Want More on Kids and Resilience?

Subscribe Today

We hope you've enjoyed this newsletter, which is made possible through subscriber support. Subscribe to The New York Times with this special offer.

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let's celebrate the tiny victories.

My 6-year-old has decided he loves the game "vacuum monster," where I vacuum the living-room floor and, occasionally, try to get his toes. The other day he volunteered to pick up all the toys on the floor so we could play. — Cara Leone, New London, N.H.

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

2021年8月31日 星期二

The buying of the American mind

Government officials can be corrupted — but so can their critics.

For Times Subscribers

View in browsernytimes.com
New York Times logo
Paul Krugman

August 31, 2021

Newsletter Notice

Beginning in September, the Paul Krugman newsletter will be available only to Times subscribers. Subscribe to The Times to continue receiving it.

A selection of our newsletters will soon be reserved for Times subscribers. Subscribe now for $1/week for access to Times journalism and all of our newsletters — to follow your interests and discover others.

John Taggart/Bloomberg
Author Headshot

By Paul Krugman

Opinion Columnist

Today's column was inspired by the latest twist in our still shambolic response to Covid — the continuing refusal of many Americans to get vaccinated and the insistence of some of them on swallowing horse paste instead. I tried to link this horrifying, if comic, development to the long relationship between right-wing extremism and patent medicine. But I didn't have space to put this in the broader context of how money influences politics and policy.

The simple fact is that none of us are saints. Even those who claim to be working for the common good can be and often are influenced by the prospect of personal reward. As conservative economists like to say, incentives matter.

Indeed, it's usually conservative economists who make this point most strongly. Half a century ago George Stigler of the University of Chicago published a hugely influential paper titled "The theory of economic regulation," which argued that government regulators — like the boards setting rules for electricity generation and pricing — weren't like the wise, selfless guardians of Plato's "Republic"; they were human and hence subject to influence, which in practice meant that regulators were often captured by the very industries they were supposed to regulate.

It was a good point, if perhaps too extreme — regulators may not be saints, but they aren't always purely creatures of self-interest either. But it was too narrowly applied. Stigler's followers have used his logic to make the case against regulation, arguing that regulators will be corrupted by special interests. But why restrict that insight to government officials? In particular, why not apply it to their own political movement?

After all, surely the same logic that applies to regulators also applies to politicians and pundits, including those on the right who denounce regulation. And for that matter, it applies to intellectuals too, especially in those situations where the possible rewards for expressing the "right" opinions go beyond prestige and promotion into the realm of cold, hard cash.

And as far back as I can remember, the world of conservative opinion and thought has in fact consisted largely of bought men and women. (I'll talk about liberals in a minute.)

I don't think it was always thus. I'm not a huge fan of Milton Friedman's legacy, but I do believe that he — and for that matter, Stigler — said what they did out of genuine, unforced conviction. Things have, however, changed since their heyday. In fact, they've changed twice.

First came the rise of "movement conservatism" — a highly organized set of interlocking institutions, all backed by billionaires and big corporations, of which the Republican Party was only one piece. There were also media organizations, especially Fox, think tanks like the Heritage Foundation and more. By the Aughts (we never did come up with a better name for this century's first decade) these institutions had created a safe space, a guarantee of a stable and fairly lucrative career, for people willing to say the right things — tax cuts good, regulation bad — and not rock the boat.

I never thought I'd be nostalgic for the era when big money ruled the right. But traditional corporate influence looks benign compared with where we are now. At this point, to be a conservative in good standing you have to pledge allegiance to blatant lies — Democrats are Marxists, the election was stolen, basic public health measures are sinister assaults on freedom.

Why are so many people who have to know better willing to go along with these lies? Again, self-interest — partly ambition, and yes, partly financial reward. Obviously the snake-oil industry doesn't have anything like the resources of more respectable Republican-leaning industries like fossil fuels or tobacco. But it offers more opportunities for personal enrichment: Ben Shapiro is presumably well paid for hawking "superfoods" in a way he couldn't be for, say, promoting oil wells.

OK, what about liberals? They're people too, with all the usual human flaws; there are plenty of prominent liberals who I know personally to be driven by ego and to some extent by monetary considerations, people like … actually, not going there. But they live in a different environment from conservatives.

The old Will Rogers line — "I am not a member of any organized political party — I am a Democrat" — still applies. Political science research confirms that the Republican Party, and conservatism in general, is an ideological monolith, albeit one largely under new management. Democrats and the center-left in general, by contrast, are a loose coalition, and to prosper in that coalition you have to satisfy multiple constituencies. This makes it harder to sell your soul, because it's not clear who you're supposed to sell it to.

In the subculture I know best, politically active economists, those on the left, no matter how passionate they are about their politics — and no matter how self-centered — feel the need to retain academic credibility and, for those who do consulting, credibility with serious business interests. (See, I told you nobody is a saint.) Many of my economist friends look very favorably on President Biden's policies, but they wouldn't risk their reputations by claiming that Biden has Nobel-quality economic insight — or selling nutritional supplements.

So the blend of craziness and corruption taking place on the American right is special, without anything comparable on the left. Don't both-sides this.

Quick Hits

An oil field in the placenta.

According to Rand Paul, scientists advising against horse paste just hate Trump.

But evolution is finally winning the argument.

Reminder: This newsletter will soon be reserved for Times subscribers.

Your access to the Paul Krugman newsletter ends in September. Subscribe now to keep receiving it and to enjoy all the benefits of being a Times subscriber.

Facing the Music

It's devastated now, but remember the joy.YouTube

Hoping that New Orleans comes back soon.

Enjoy this newsletter? Subscribe to keep receiving it.

We've reserved a selection of newsletters, including this one, for Times subscribers. Subscriber support ensures that we have the resources to deliver original, quality journalism in every form — including our newsletters.

Your access to this newsletter ends in September. Become a Times subscriber to enjoy our journalism and to continue to read this newsletter and any others you find interesting.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Paul Krugman from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018