2021年9月8日 星期三

A Hate Group Targeted My Kid Online

How caregivers can protect children from vicious trolls.

A Hate Group Targeted My Kid Online

By Misha Valencia

Jamiel Law

Extremists targeted my 12-year-old son online.

He was playing a virtual game with friends over the summer when another child let a user into the group who they had not played with before. That account then ushered in other users, and several days later they launched a toxic tirade of harassment and flooded the chat with anti-Semitic vitriol, swastikas and neo-Nazi propaganda.

When my son pushed back, they bombarded him with aggressive, hateful messages. As soon as we blocked and reported one abusive account, another disturbing message would appear within seconds in a seemingly coordinated attack.

My son and I had previously discussed what to do if he was ever targeted online, or witnessed harassment, and we were able to respond quickly, but his experience is not unusual.

Hate speech and online abuse have been pervasive in digital spaces for many years, but the use of gaming and messaging platforms by extremists and the alt-right to target younger users is increasing as more children play online. A 2017 Pew study found that 90 percent of teens now use gaming platforms; and a 2019 survey from Common Sense Media found that 64 percent of tweens 8 to 12 years old play online games.

"Extremists are moving more and more into gaming spaces and targeting a young audience," said Mark Potok, an expert in domestic hate groups and former senior fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center. "This kind of access is what they have wanted for years."

Virtual hate speech also increased during the pandemic as online activity soared, according to a report issued by L1GHT, a technology company that identifies toxic speech online.

ADVERTISEMENT

"It's not men in white hoods on the street anymore," said Laura Guy, a clinical social worker in New York City who works with children who have been targeted online. "They don't always begin with overtly hateful language. Oftentimes, they try to engage youth with edgy, dark humor and provocative jokes."

Caregivers can use privacy settings as a first line of defense against online harassment or recruiting, but extremists find workarounds to gain access to children. For instance, they create misleading or fake accounts to lure children and their friends into accepting friend requests, or to join their games.

In Discord — a popular messaging platform where gamers can chat while playing — extremists have espoused hate and created servers glorifying Nazis. Users can organize "raiding parties" that encourage their members to barrage another server with hateful messages.

Children can unknowingly let extremists in if they post their server link on Disboard (a site not owned by Discord where people can search for Discord servers). Extremists can use that posted link to infiltrate.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hate groups frequently use video games to recruit members, but they have also become a prime space to harass children. "If you are not one of them, you are an enemy, and they enjoy trying to make people miserable" Mr. Potok said.

A 2020 Anti-Defamation League survey found that 68 percent of online gamers experienced severe harassment. Fifty-three percent of respondents said they were harassed based on "race/ethnicity, religion, ability status, gender or sexual orientation"; and 51 percent received threats of violence.

Mr. Potok said that online abuse is a problem all children can experience, but marginalized groups are at particular risk.

Lydia Elle, an African American business owner and writer in California, said her 11-year-old daughter began playing the online game Roblox during the pandemic to connect with school friends. Her daughter put an avatar of an African American girl on her profile and was quickly targeted, her mother said. "Virulent racists quickly honed in on her and called her horrible names," Ms. Elle said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Some platforms report they are taking steps to address extremism, such as using artificial intelligence to detect offensive content and increasing moderation, but many users say it has taken far too long for tech companies to address the harassment, and that it has not declined.

Representatives for Discord and Roblox each said that their platforms have zero tolerance for hate speech and "violent extremism."

Discord uses "a mix of proactive and reactive tools to keep activity that violates our policies off the service," the company said in a statement. These include automated search tools like PhotoDNA and ways for users to report violations. Roblox reported that it uses a "combination of machine learning and a team of over 3,000" people to detect inappropriate content.

Lori Getz, an internet safety expert and the author of "The Tech Savvy User's Guide to the Digital World," said that caregivers can't control everything children are exposed to, but parents can empower children to handle difficult situations online. Here's how:

Start the conversation early.

Talk with children in age-appropriate ways about hate — including overt and covert signs, such as words, symbols and images — and trusting their instincts if something doesn't seem right. "If caregivers don't talk with their children about these things, someone else will, and it may not be a credible source," Ms. Guy said.

If children are harassed online, ensure they have support, said Robyn Silverman, a child and teen development specialist. Online abuse should be taken just as seriously as other types of abuse, she said, noting that children and teens who are targeted "can experience anxiety, depression, difficulty sleeping, stomach aches and other physical symptoms from cyber abuse."

Maintaining an ongoing, open dialogue about online safety is crucial. Even if children are not allowed to play certain games at home, they may be exposed to them in other places. A British survey of 20,000 children ages 11-18 reported that 57 percent said they have accounts that "adults don't know about."

Children may withhold information from caregivers, especially if they are targeted online, out of fear of losing their games, Dr. Silverman said. "Share with your children that they won't be in trouble if they come to you about this," she suggested. "Let them know that you are there to support them."

Check content and review settings.

Review online content and the accounts that your children interact with, as well as privacy settings and parental controls. Be transparent so your children know you will be checking.

Ms. Getz recommended that caregivers check game ratings. Online platforms for children under 13 have stricter privacy requirements under the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule than platforms that target older users.

Make a plan ahead of time.

Ensure that your child knows what to do if they are targeted. To start with, they should tell a trusted adult who can provide support. It is important to screenshot the comments, block offensive users, leave the game or chat, and report abusive accounts.

Reporting procedures vary by platforms — review with your child how to submit a report before a problem arises.

Reporting may feel futile when platforms are slow to respond, but experts say it matters. "Reporting helps children feel empowered that they did something," Ms. Getz said. "Choosing not to report also means hateful accounts have little chance of being flagged."

Caregivers should report threats of violence to law enforcement.

Encourage your child to speak up.

Kids who witness online abuse can help by making it clear that they will not be a bystander to hate, Ms. Getz said.

Ms. Elle's daughter and her friends have a plan — if one of them is attacked, they all screenshot the comments and report the account. "Standing up to hate doesn't just fall on the person being targeted," Ms. Elle said. "Being an ally can really make a difference when someone is targeted."

Calling out hate is important, Ms. Getz said, but engaging in a toxic, ongoing exchange can be traumatizing for children and gives extremists more attention.

Ms. Getz recommended that when children and adolescents witness online hate they should reply with one clearly worded response: "Let them know that what they are doing is unacceptable and you will not be a part of it — and then disengage and report the account."

Want More on Kids and Online Safety?

Subscribe Today

We hope you've enjoyed this newsletter, which is made possible through subscriber support. Subscribe to The New York Times with this special offer.

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let's celebrate the tiny victories.

I bought my daughter a small, soft alpaca to take to school and help with her social anxiety. When I pick her up at school, I ask her how Alpaca's day went, and she opens up to me about her day. — Summer Koester, Juneau, Alaska

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/

2021年9月4日 星期六

Private Schools Wrestle With Race

The debate over antiracism education; the wait for a kids' vaccine; and more from NYT Parenting.
A roundup of new guidance and stories from NYT Parenting.
Golden Cosmos

Amid the squabbling about proposed mask mandates in schools and vaccine requirements for teachers, it's easy to forget about another hot-button issue still causing contentious debates at school-board meetings countrywide: antiracism curriculum.

ADVERTISEMENT

Michael Powell recently looked at the microcosm of New York private schools and how their attempts to address race and white privilege have resulted in revolts that mirror what's happening countrywide.

"Elite private schools from Los Angeles to Washington, D.C., from Boston to Columbus, Ohio, have embraced a mission to end racism by challenging white privilege," he writes. "A sizable group of parents and teachers say the schools have taken it too far — and enforced suffocating and destructive groupthink on students."

A piece from Alisha Haridasani Gupta this week explains how the U.S. military "transformed what was once an underfunded, scattershot child care system into one of the best in the country." Some see it as a model for civilian child care.

Many parents are eager to get their young children vaccinated against Covid-19, but they'll have to wait a bit longer than anticipated because clinical trials need more time, Tara Parker-Pope explains. In Opinion, Michelle Goldberg calls the wait "intolerable."

ADVERTISEMENT

New York City is introducing a new incentive for kids 12 and up to get vaccinated at some city-run sites: a free special-edition comic book. "Captain America started out as a skinny kid from Brooklyn, OK?" Mayor Bill de Blasio said during a news conference. "Skinny kid from Brooklyn becomes a superhero. You, too, all my young viewers, you too can become a superhero if you get vaccinated."

Finally, Jennifer Krauss lists eight picture books that "explore the many different paths to fall learning," including "Lunch Every Day," about a bully who steals another boy's lunch every day, rather than stand in the free-lunch line.

Thanks for reading!

— Melonyce McAfee, senior editor, NYT Parenting

When it comes to our children and Covid, we have more questions than answers. Times subscribers can R.S.V.P. to watch Dr. Anthony Fauci and Times journalists answer your questions. Join us Thursday, Sept. 9 at 1 p.m. E.T.

ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe Today

We hope you've enjoyed this newsletter, which is made possible through subscriber support. Subscribe to The New York Times with this special offer.

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let's celebrate the tiny victories.

My 2-year-old loves baths, but was afraid of having showers. I told her the water from the shower head is rain, and now she requests to dance "in the rain" with her bath toys. — Mor Rubinstein, London

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/

2021年9月3日 星期五

Wonking Out: A very Austrian pandemic

Friedrich Hayek gave terrible policy advice.

For Times Subscribers

View in browsernytimes.com
New York Times logo
Paul Krugman

September 3, 2021

Newsletter Notice

This is your last Paul Krugman newsletter.

The Paul Krugman newsletter is now only available to Times subscribers. Subscriber support ensures that we have the resources to deliver original, quality journalism in every form — including our newsletters.

Subscribe to The Times now to continue to receive this newsletter, discover other newsletters to enjoy and gain access to the journalism of The Times online and in our app.

Friedrich HayekBettmann Archive/Getty Images
Author Headshot

By Paul Krugman

Opinion Columnist

Remember Austrian economics? In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, a number of conservatives rejected Keynesian economic prescriptions and claimed instead to be devotees of the Austrian School, especially Friedrich Hayek.

It's questionable how many of these self-proclaimed "Austrians" actually knew what they were endorsing. In general, when right-wingers talk about intellectual history, you want to fire up your fact-checking. For example, Mark Levin of Fox News has a best-selling book claiming not just that the current American left is in the thrall of European Marxists but more specifically that they're followers of Herbert Marcuse and the Frankfurt School — except that he keeps calling it the "Franklin School."

And the idea that there was a titanic intellectual battle in the 1930s between Hayek and John Maynard Keynes is basically fan fiction; Hayek's views on the Great Depression didn't get much intellectual traction at the time, and his fame came later, with the publication of his 1944 political tract "The Road to Serfdom."

Nonetheless, there was an identifiable Austrian analysis of the Depression, shared by Hayek and other economists, including Joseph Schumpeter. Where Keynes argued that the Depression was caused by a general shortfall in demand, Hayek and Schumpeter argued that we were looking at the inevitable difficulties of adjusting to the aftermath of a boom. In their view, excessive optimism had led to the allocation of too much labor and other resources to the production of investment goods, and a depression was just the economy's way of getting those resources back where they belonged.

This view had logical problems: If transferring resources out of investment goods causes mass unemployment, why didn't the same thing happen when resources were being transferred in and away from other industries? It was also clearly at odds with experience: During the Depression and, for that matter after the 2008 crisis, there was excess capacity and unemployment in just about every industry — not slack in some and shortages in others.

This time, however, is different. Although we aren't hearing much about Austrian economics these days, the pandemic really did produce an Austrian-style reallocation shock, with demand for some things surging while demand for other things slumped. You can see this even at a macro level: There was a huge increase in purchases of durable goods even as services struggled. (Think people buying stationary bikes because they can't go to the gym. Hey, I did.)

A very weird slump.FRED

You can see it even more clearly in the details: Record vacancies in the market for office space, a crippling shortage of shipping containers.

So we're finally having the kind of economic crisis that people like Hayek and Schumpeter wrongly believed we were having in the 1930s. Does this mean that we should follow the policy advice they gave back then?

No.

That's the message of a paper by Veronica Guerrieri, Guido Lorenzoni, Ludwig Straub and Iván Werning that was prepared for this year's Jackson Hole meeting — an important Federal Reserve conference that often produces influential research. (Fun fact: I've been blackballed from Jackson Hole since the early 2000s, when I had the temerity to criticize Alan Greenspan before it was fashionable.) Guerrieri et al. never explicitly mention the Austrians, but their paper can nonetheless be construed as a refutation of their policy prescriptions.

Hayek and Schumpeter were adamantly against any attempt to fight the Great Depression with monetary and fiscal stimulus. Hayek decried the use of "artificial stimulants," insisting that we should instead "leave it to time to effect a permanent cure by the slow process of adapting the structure of production." Schumpeter warned that "any revival which is merely due to artificial stimulus leaves part of the work of depressions undone."

But these conclusions didn't follow even if you accepted their incorrect analysis of what the Depression was all about. Why should the need to move workers out of a sector lead to unemployment? Why shouldn't it simply lead to lower wages?

The answer in practice is downward nominal wage rigidity: Employers are really reluctant to cut wages, because of the effects on worker morale. Here's the distribution of wage changes in 2009-10, from the linked paper:

Distribution of wage changes, 2009-10.Fallick et al

The big spike at zero represents large numbers of employers who had an abundance of job applicants but didn't want to cut wages, so they just left them unchanged.

However, if wages can't fall in the sector that needs to shrink, why can't they increase in the sector that needs to expand? Sure, it would lead to a temporary rise in inflation — but that would be OK.

Guerrieri et al. argue, with a formal model to back them up, that the optimal response to a reallocation shock is indeed a very expansionary monetary policy that causes a temporary spike in inflation. Workers would still have an incentive to change jobs, because real wages would fall in their old jobs but rise elsewhere. But there wouldn't have to be large-scale unemployment.

Maybe this was obvious from the start — or maybe not, because most of us were so focused on the wrongness of the Austrians' diagnosis of the problem that we didn't spend much time thinking about their solution. Now that we've finally had the shock Austrian economists kept imagining, we can see that they were still giving very bad advice.

And in case you're wondering, the Fed, by accepting transitory inflation, is getting it right.

Reminder: This newsletter will soon be reserved for Times subscribers.

Your access to the Paul Krugman newsletter ends in September. Subscribe now to keep receiving it and to enjoy all the benefits of being a Times subscriber.

Feedback If you're enjoying what you're reading, please consider recommending it to friends. They can sign up here. If you want to share your thoughts on an item in this week's newsletter or on the newsletter in general, please email me at krugman-newsletter@nytimes.com.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Paul Krugman from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/