2021年3月31日 星期三

Open Mic for Two

Bringing my baby on stage helped me forge my identity as a new mom.

Open Mic for Two

Sol Cotti

I'm on vacation, so I'm handing over the newsletter to Kaitlyn Greenidge, a frequent contributor to NYT Parenting and the author of a magnificent new novel, "Libertie." This week, Kaitlyn writes about grappling with her identity as a new mom.

— Jessica Grose, columnist, NYT Parenting

So much of how you parent is determined by the stories you tell yourself about being a mother. I had a child later in life, after my friends did. In the many years between their kids being born and my own, I listened to how they talked about motherhood. Some seemed to self-soothe on narratives of constant near-catastrophe: Forgetting snacks for preschool or buying the wrong color tights turned into an epic tale of self-flagellation and damning of the patriarchy.

ADVERTISEMENT

Others reveled in their own nonchalance. I will always be in awe of a friend who casually mentioned watching old episodes of "Unsolved Mysteries" on her way from work to day care pick-up. "I just put my phone on the dashboard and go. It's like a visual podcast," she said, while our mutual friend looked on horrified and admonished, "That's called watching TV while you drive."

My daughter is not even 2, so I'm still figuring out what story to tell myself. Before she was born, I had fantasies, like all parents do. I wanted to be a cool Brooklyn mom. I wanted her first food to be beef carpaccio, like someone once claimed to me their child's was. I wanted to casually take her from the park to the museum to the beach all in one day, only stopping for photogenic snacks at sleek cafes, where she definitely wouldn't try to eat the dirt out of the pots holding the monstera plants.

But her birth was hard. It was an amorphous event that didn't fit the scary stories I'd read before I went into the hospital, but it still managed to be my own personal medicalized horror. After she entered the world, I was desperate to fill myself up with experience, any experience, to know that my life could move on, that motherhood could feel different than that.

I threw myself into ambitious projects. When she was about a week old, I saw a flier for a block association meeting and spontaneously decided to join. Sitting in the meeting, still sore and bandaged from my C-section, I volunteered to help fund-raise for the annual block party. "You just had a baby," my neighbor gently pointed out. Another said: "That's good, though. She can bring the baby with us when we go door to door for money. People will open the door then."

ADVERTISEMENT

That neighbor was right. She and the baby and I walked up and down the block and collected something like $700 for a bouncy house and some hot dogs. It was such a success that it became a new myth I could create about myself: I went through a terrible birth and a painful C-section and not three days after being home from the hospital, I put myself and that baby to work.

This is, in retrospect, unhinged. I feel bad for that past self, so committed to using work and service as a coping mechanism that I couldn't give myself even a week off. Even in the moment, as I told this story to myself and friends, it felt wrong in my mouth, like biting down on a tin spoon.

I kept looking for different experiences, different selves to try on. The fliers in the neighborhood helped. One of them was for a baby music class that I started taking my daughter to as soon as it made sense. We found ourselves in a storefront with a bunch of toddlers, my daughter the only child there who couldn't yet raise her head. Still, the class leader welcomed us.

About 20 minutes in, another mother burst into the room. She was all bustle and bright colors — her hair was topped in a large yellow head wrap and she had the confidence to wear dangling, Africa-shaped earrings around a roomful of toddlers. Her son joyously jumped into the middle of the circle. I saw her and thought, I need that energy. I hoped she would be my friend. After many attempts to make eye contact with her and her son, she noticed me and immediately clocked me as a first-time mom. "I was just like you when he was your daughter's age," she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

She invited us to join her and her son for smoothies after class, and it would become a weekly ritual. That first time we talked about trying to make art and be creative with young children. She told me how much she loved live storytelling events, how she was drawn to them, but that she was always disappointed by how white the lineups were. "I want a storytelling series for us," she said. "I want one where we can just talk about us, and our story won't only be about something some white person did to us."

She is a powerhouse, so she had organized a storytelling show for her friends and family in another storefront in the neighborhood. "I have a vision," she announced to me, "You are going to come and you are going to strap your baby to your chest and you are going to tell a story for us. Nothing prepared. You will stand up there and do it."

This was unlike the public speaking I do as part of my job as a writer — always preplanned, or from written remarks. The thought of speaking unguarded in public was terrifying, especially imagining doing so with my baby. But I wanted to be the type of mom this new friend imagined me to be. I wanted to be the mom in that story. So I said I would come and maybe I would try.

After an awkward hour of lurking by the snack table at the event with my daughter in her carrier, realizing I knew almost no one there, my friend called me to the stage. I stood up there in front of strangers, supremely nervous, and just started talking.

I can't remember what story I told; I think it was some rambling thing about walking past an old workplace. When it was done, I fled the stage and headed home to make dinner. But I do remember walking home in the dusk, telling myself over and over again, "This is possible, this is possible, this is possible."

Kaitlyn Greenidge is the author of the new novel "Libertie" and the features director at Harper's Bazaar.

Want More on Motherhood and Identity?

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let's celebrate the tiny victories.

Now that my 16-year-old is on camera all day, her bed is not only made but has a throw draped artisanally across the foot. Naomi Mercer, Arlington, Va.

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for NYT Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/

2021年3月30日 星期二

On Tech: How big is Amazon, really?

Plus, what is TV for the smartphone age?

How big is Amazon, really?

Igor Bastidas

I'm fond of repeating a shopping statistic that often surprises people. In the United States — even during the pandemic — only about $14 out of each $100 worth of stuff we buy is spent online. Amazon is responsible for roughly $5 of that.

So is Amazon a giant that dominates our internet spending or a blip in America's shopping universe? It depends on how you look at the numbers. Amazon is huge in internet sales, but puny relative to all the goods Americans buy.

Our perception of Amazon's size influences how the public and policymakers think about the company. And yet while the company's share of spending matters, it also doesn't tell us everything.

Permit me to get a little nerdy about numbers. Without a doubt, Amazon is the king of online shopping in the United States. The research firm eMarketer estimated that Amazon will be responsible for more than 40 percent of Americans' e-commerce spending this year. The second-largest internet store, Walmart, is far behind at about 7 percent.

Back to my point, though, that internet shopping remains relatively small. The picture is a little different depending on how you count.

U.S. government data on online shopping plus those eMarketer estimates put Amazon at about 5 percent of all U.S. retail sales. The number glosses over huge variations. In some categories, like books and electronics, online shopping is well over half of all purchases, and Amazon is getting the biggest chunk. In major categories of consumer spending like groceries, cars and gasoline, Americans are still buying almost everything in person.

PAID POST: A MESSAGE FROM NCTA

America's Cable Broadband Network Is Ready for a Future of Possibilities

The 10G network will power the "fourth industrial revolution," enabling creators to develop life-changing innovations that consumers will be able to use every day.

Learn more

(For more on Amazon's market size, check out this report by the news outlet The Information, as well as past work by the technology analyst Ben Evans and me. And there's a wrinkle: A trade group for retailers recently told me that there could be inaccuracies in the government counting of shopping that blurs the line between stores and online, such as picking up online orders in person.)

Data can be a weapon. Amazon often uses a version of the 5 percent sales figure to counter critics who say the company is too big and powerful. But government investigations into big technology companies are looking at the behavior of Big Tech, not just their size. They're trying to answer whether companies abuse their power to get advantages over competitors and hurt us.

Amazon has had a profound influence on people's behavior, the strategies of entire industries and our communities no matter what the numbers say.

What we're seeing in real life from Amazon and beyond are big ripple effects from a small market share. Likewise, Uber and Lyft represent a fraction of the miles driven in the United States but have significantly contributed to increased traffic. If only a tiny percentage of American office workers do their jobs from home when the pandemic ends, it could alter the function and finances of some cities.

ADVERTISEMENT

So, is Amazon big? Yes and also no. And the reality is that no matter what the numbers say, Amazon commands the attention of people, other companies and governments because it's influential in reshaping the world.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

What is TV for the smartphone age?

I love TV. Always have. But I have been surprised that 14 years after the iPhone was introduced, the new forms of TV are still created mostly with computers and TV sets in mind.

T-Mobile said this week that it was ditching a short-lived attempt at making its own live television option for people to watch on their phones. It was a weird strategy. T-Mobile's former TV service and YouTube TV were trying to recreate cable television but over the internet. And yet Americans are quitting cable in droves. Why try to replicate it?

ADVERTISEMENT

But there is a good question buried in T-Mobile's fumbles: Why isn't more video entertainment being built around smartphones?

Phones are where Americans are spending more of our time, and where people in many large countries including China and India already devote nearly all of their screen time.

Sure, people watch America's most popular video-entertainment services including YouTube and Netflix on phones. But we still don't have a wildly successful U.S. video-entertainment service built for smartphones first.

Quibi, a much-discussed but ultimately failed attempt at short, TV-like video series, was built for watching on our phones. But otherwise … is that it?

ADVERTISEMENT

You might say that TikTok, Instagram and Snapchat are video-entertainment services that were built for the smartphone. And maybe that's the future of TV? It's not what I thought of as television that I watched on my old bunny-ear set, but those apps are what entertain us as we wait in line at the grocery store or flop on our sofas at night.

Maybe the future of TV is here already. It just doesn't look anything like old TV.

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

Before we go …

  • The fury of a Chinese boycott: My colleagues Ray Zhong and Paul Mozur explain why China's online outrage machine sprang into action against the clothing chain H&M, including with an image depicting enslaved cotton pickers in the United States. Related: How China's online brigades turned against the wife of a U.S. diplomat.
  • The N.Y.P.D. has thousands of confiscated phones: The news site The City reported that the New York Police Department seized more than 55,000 phones in 2020 and that about 40 percent of them haven't been returned. One defense lawyer described it as a "wild goose chase" for people to get their phones back.
  • Lil Nas X plays the internet to his advantage: The Garbage Day newsletter assessed the musician's methods of turning criticism of his latest music video into online attention, TikTok dances and merchandise sales. (Be aware that there's some salty language in the newsletter.)

Hugs to this

Rain drops hitting a metallophone musical instrument make surprisingly beautiful music.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/