2021年4月30日 星期五

On Tech: How Big Tech won the pandemic

A year ago even the tech giants were anxious. Now they have so much money it's awkward.

How Big Tech won the pandemic

Erik Carter

In the early months of the pandemic in the United States, businesses were closing or were thrown into chaos. Millions of people shut their wallets as they were shut in. I wrote in On Tech at that time that it wasn't obvious that America's biggest technology companies would continue to thrive as they had for the last decade or so.

The Big Tech bosses sounded uneasy, too. After all, America's five tech titans didn't do so hot in the Great Recession nearly 15 years earlier. Maybe they'd suffer this time around, too.

Hahahahaha. Yeah … They were fine. Really, really fine.

In the last year, the five tech superpowers — Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft and Facebook — had combined revenue of more than $1.2 trillion, as I wrote for The Times on Thursday. It was a strange and amazing year for Big Tech. I can't believe it, but some of the companies are growing faster and are more profitable than they have been in years.

The pandemic has made the tech giants and their bosses unfathomably rich. (Even more unfathomably rich than they were before.) Apple has so much extra cash that it's spending an additional $90 billion to buy its own stock, nearly the equivalent of Kenya's gross domestic product. Of the 10 richest people in the world, eight made their fortunes from tech companies. The man at the top, Amazon's Jeff Bezos, alone is worth more than one-and-a-half Goldman Sachs.

ADVERTISEMENT

I have seen a lot of bananas financial numbers, including from these five tech giants. But I promise you that Big Tech's numbers are now so wild that I am running out of non-curse words to explain them.

How did this happen? I'll give you two explanations. First, the pandemic created a peculiar economy that benefited some people and industries, including in technology, even as it battered others. In the last year of crisis, people and businesses had even greater demand for what the tech giants were selling.

That might seem obvious now, but it wasn't necessarily a year ago. Americans' love of home shopping became a safety necessity for some people. Families bought iPads and Macs as work and school went virtual. Any business that still had money to spend on marketing spent it on Google, Facebook or Amazon. Companies might have cut back in other areas, but they definitely bought software from Microsoft and Amazon.

Second, the tech giants used the pandemic as a moment to get stronger. In some cases, that meant cutting costs where it matters less, like on travel, entertainment and marketing. Google said it was saving more than $1 billion a year on those types of expenses.

ADVERTISEMENT

On the flip side, the tech giants spent big in areas that extend their advantage. Amazon spent $50 billion in the last year on big-ticket purchases like warehouses and cloud computing hubs. That's more than double what Exxon Mobil spends to dig oil and gas out of the ground each year. Again, bananas.

As the economies in the United States and some other parts of the world come back to life in 2021, the tech giants are lean, mean and ready to make even more money. The questions that I have now: Are America's tech powers invincible? And are they winning at everyone else's expense?

The first is impossible to answer, but it sure feels that way. And I put that second question to Thomas Philippon, a professor of finance at New York University, who studies the growing power of dominant companies.

Philippon told me that the pandemic and the digital adaptations it forced did help smaller businesses. Restaurants, for example, had to quickly adapt to sell web orders and do deliveries, and many of those investments will help them in the long run, too.

ADVERTISEMENT

But he also believes that the pandemic probably widened the gap between the big and rich companies, including the tech giants, and everyone else. "Definitely there is a sense that it's a recession that happened to be good for companies that were already doing well," he said.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

Before we go …

  • Big Tech's success is awkward, though: The European Union accused Apple of breaking the law by using control of its iPhone app store to stifle competition, my colleague Adam Satariano wrote. This is one of approximately four billion antitrust lawsuits or investigations involving the tech superpowers.
  • Is this the office or "The Office"? Google, the company that has set trends for office work and employee perks, is now trying to reimagine the post-pandemic workplace. Dai Wakabayashi and Cayce Clifford detail Google's plans, which include robots that inflate temporary, cellophane balloon walls and camp-themed outdoor work spaces.
  • Read this to feel totally uncool: Invented out of the blue by people on TikTok, the term "cheugy" is a new and not-quite-definable shorthand for things that are a bit generic, trying too hard or out of date. Instagram's once dominant aesthetic is peak cheugy. Lasagna is apparently cheugy, too? Just read Taylor Lorenz's explanation of all this.

Hugs to this

Prancer found a home! The Chihuahua that a pet adoption volunteer had described as a "rage machine" and a "vessel for a traumatized Victorian child" now lives with a woman in Connecticut, Ariel Davis.

The photos of Prancer enjoying the flowers almost make him seem huggable. And of course, Prancer has his own Instagram account.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/

2021年4月29日 星期四

On Tech: Don’t ignore ransomware. It’s bad.

Ransomware attacks can bring down schools and hospitals. It's time we took them more seriously.

Don't ignore ransomware. It's bad.

Adam Ferriss

Ransomware attacks can be devastating, and they're only getting worse.

This form of cybercrime involves hackers breaking into computer networks and locking up digital information until the victim pays for its release. Hospitals crippled by ransomware attacks have been forced to turn away patients, and a natural gas pipeline was forced offline for two days last year.

My colleague Nicole Perlroth has spent years chronicling the proliferation of cyberattacks, including ransomware. She spoke to me about steps that the U.S. government and individual organizations could take to better prevent it. Nicole tried to be hopeful but she has a discouraging diagnosis of ransomware's root cause: America has failed to invest in its defense.

Shira: Have ransomware attacks become more common or does it just seem that way?

Nicole: It has gotten worse. We've seen a surge in attacks, more types of organizations targeted and ransom demands up to the tens of millions of dollars. And ransomware gangs are hitting us in ever more visceral ways.

The pandemic made things worse. Companies, schools and other organizations had to accommodate employees working virtually. That created more opportunity for criminals.

Just in the last few months in the United States, ransomware gangs have hit big businesses, schools and universities, local governments, hospitals and the police. And they're getting more brazen. A relatively new twist is criminals threatening to release organizations' data publicly if they don't pay.

What are some of the consequences of ransomware attacks?

Criminals recently targeted a police department in Florida and leaked records including a folder labeled "dead" with photos of bodies from crime scenes.

ADVERTISEMENT

The worst that I've seen happened at the University of Vermont Medical Center. The hospital couldn't treat some chemotherapy patients because an attack wiped their records. Nurses said it was one of the worst experiences of their careers.

How can anyone justify hurting cancer patients or leaking photos of dead people?

I have no words for this that could be printed in a family newspaper.

What is the United States doing to stop or slow ransomware?

We're not trying very hard. The United States is the most targeted country by cybercriminals and nation states, but we're not acting like it. We're mostly outlining guidelines for companies and government agencies to prevent ransomware attacks and hoping for the best. It's not working.

What should be done instead?

There is no silver bullet, but there are some steps that could help. The U.S. government could designate ransomware as a national security threat on par with terrorism, which would funnel more intelligence resources to combat it. Countries that are safe havens for ransomware gangs such as Russia could be subject to sanctions or restrictions on travel to the United States. That would pressure countries to go after ransomware criminals inside their borders.

ADVERTISEMENT

We could also require that companies and government agencies that are hit by ransomware attacks disclose them publicly. The Treasury Department could consider prohibiting victims from paying ransoms. Most ransomware gangs demand payment in Bitcoin, and it could help trace criminals if banking industry "Know Thy Customer" rules and anti-money-laundering laws were enforced with cryptocurrency exchanges.

And we need a 911-type hotline for ransomware victims. Organizations often don't know who to call when they are targeted.

What can organizations that are targeted by ransomware attacks do to prevent them?

If companies, government agencies and organizations required all employees and others who access their computer networks to use strong passwords, password managers and multi-step authentication, it would go a long way to prevent cyberattacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

It would also help if organizations were required to have copies of their digital records and to back them up regularly. Victims wouldn't be in the position to have to pay to recover their own data. The government could also create tax credits or other financial incentives for companies and government agencies to take those steps.

I don't want to blame victims, but why aren't companies and public agencies taking those protection measures already?

A lot of essential services are operated by small organizations that don't have the resources or the capabilities to even do the basics. American hospitals, schools and governments are common ransomware targets because they tend to use older software with security holes that can't be repaired.

This sounds grim.

I don't want people to feel hopeless. But yes, ransomware and other cyberattacks are only going to get worse. The central problem is America's lack of urgency and investment to protect digital systems.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

Before we go …

  • Beijing could be the final arbiter of its tech industry: China is trying to force major technology companies to change behavior it considered anticompetitive. Instead, Chinese internet companies are using the threat of government action to browbeat their rivals, my colleague Li Yuan wrote in her latest column. She said that could further strengthen the Communist Party's authority over China's digital industries.
  • His menacing rant was illegal: A jury in New York concluded that a man who posted online threats against members of Congress but didn't act on them was not protected by the First Amendment, my colleague Nicole Hong reported. Last week in On Tech, Nicole described this case and the line between hateful free expression and illegal threats.
  • Big bucks for Big Tech: Apple and Facebook made so much money so far this year. And Amazon, which has been on a hiring spree, will raise hourly pay for about half a million workers.

Hugs to this

Cellists played concerts for some music-loving cows (and humans) in a village near Copenhagen. The cows didn't seem to like Dvorak.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

歡迎蒞臨:https://ofa588.com/

娛樂推薦:https://www.ofa86.com/