2021年6月1日 星期二

On Tech: The human toll of bearing witness

Smartphone videos are tools for bearing witness and holding the powerful to account. But they come at a cost.

The human toll of bearing witness

Glenn Harvey

Bystander smartphone videos, like the one that Darnella Frazier took a year ago of the murder of George Floyd, have provided powerful documentation of acts of racism or police brutality. Phones and social media have also empowered people to tell their own stories and helped bring more attention to the mistreatment of Black Americans.

But Allissa V. Richardson, a professor of journalism and communication at the University of Southern California, says that it's enough already.

Videos like the ones of the deaths of Floyd and Eric Garner in 2014 are important legal and historical records, Dr. Richardson said, but those videos can repeatedly re-expose crime victims, their family members and witnesses to their worst moments. And they can make it seem like Black Americans need to provide proof of racist violence to be believed.

"We in the public don't need these videos anymore," Dr. Richardson said. "They belong in the realm of the families and juries."

Technology puts in people's hands the tools to bear witness, hold the powerful accountable and better understand our world. Dr. Richardson is asking us to balance those benefits against the costs of what happens to the people involved after the recordings end. Talking to her broadened my thinking, and I hope her comments do the same for you.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr. Richardson, who wrote the book "Bearing Witness While Black," put the current era's bystander videos of police violence in historical context. She said there is a long track record of Black Americans forcing awareness of racist violence, including Ida B. Wells's accounts of lynchings, Mamie Till Mobley's insistence on showing the public her son's mutilated body and civil rights marchers' beatings in Selma, Ala., in 1965.

In the past, however, Dr. Richardson said that Black Americans were sometimes able to choose for themselves whether and how to tell their stories publicly. That control is now more elusive. Philonise Floyd, a brother of George Floyd, has written about how he saw his brother die a thousand times in the last year. Frazier and Ramsey Orta, who recorded a video of Garner's death, have spoken about the toll the experience took on them.

And Dr. Richardson said that photos or videos of violent attacks against mostly white Americans, including the 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas, aren't typically replayed on endless loops. She also said that the videos of police violence against Black Americans create a cruel feedback loop in which future victims are expected to provide visual documentation of violence against them.

"How many times do people need to see the same thing reiterated?" Dr. Richardson said.

We can't ignore the benefits of technology that let people show their points of view to the world. But we also can't overlook the unintended consequences when life — particularly our darkest moments — is so public.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jeffrey Middleton, a judge in Michigan, recently attracted attention for lamenting that no one asked defendants or crime victims if they wanted to be in court proceedings that were webcast publicly. "Some of these have become embarrassing, perhaps humiliating," Judge Middleton said last month.

I asked Dr. Richardson what we should do to mitigate the hurt of violent videos. She has written that news organizations should not show videos of people's death without the permission of the families, and that they should be more judicious about how often images of racist violence are shown.

As for the general public, she suggested reconsidering watching or sharing videos of violence against Black Americans. It might be more productive to take actions like pushing for police reform laws or supporting political candidates whose policies you agree with.

"We should celebrate the people who have the bravery and the presence of mind to record them," Dr. Richardson told me about bystander videos. "We should question the system that requires them to record them in the first place."

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

ADVERTISEMENT

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

Before we go …

  • The rural-urban digital divide: Politicians focus a lot on increasing internet access in unconnected rural areas. But my colleague Eduardo Porter writes that with limited taxpayer funds, making internet service more affordable and relevant in highly wired urban areas might bring more bang for the buck.
  • Why can't we move past our long digital histories? Internet evangelists once predicted that being constantly online would make people more empathetic and forgiving about one another's past mistakes. My colleague Kashmir Hill explores why the opposite has happened.
  • Here's why your Uber is probably more expensive: It's economics 101. There's more demand from riders than supply of drivers, and Uber and Lyft are paying drivers more and passing that cost on to you, my colleague Kate Conger reported. (Supply and demand imbalances are why lots of stuff, including lumber and rental cars, are more expensive right now.)

Hugs to this

Why did the moose cross the road? (You know how this joke ends.) Check out this great article with video clips of deer, a GIANT alligator, and coyote and badger buddies using tunnels and overpasses created for animals to safely cross major roads.

We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you'd like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you don't already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here. You can also read past On Tech columns.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Tech with Shira Ovide from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

2021年5月29日 星期六

Children Make You Old in the Face

The allure of plastic surgery TikTok.
A roundup of new guidance and stories from NYT Parenting.
Golden Cosmos

Lately I have been watching TikTok videos to unwind after a long day of parenting and working. I resisted the lure of the Tok for months, thinking it was like a high-pitched sound that only people under 30 could hear and enjoy. But I have succumbed to the social media network's frenetic joys, and have been particularly mesmerized by posts featuring plastic surgery and cosmetic injections, probably because it feels like my face has aged 10,000 years since March 2020. (Though to be fair, even before the pandemic, I used to joke that the tagline of NYT Parenting should be: "Children make you old in the face.")

ADVERTISEMENT

In an article I wrote about the "surgerytok" phenomenon this week, I investigate the allure of these videos, part of which is their authenticity and transparency. We are constantly bombarded with images of celebrities and influencers that defy the reality of aging, and many of these posts lift the veil. As Dr. Lara Devgan, a board-certified plastic surgeon put it to me, "Nobody believes it's kale and lemon water keeping you wrinkle-free."

In an essay, Glynnis MacNicol writes that after spending "the last 14 months staring at my neck," she has learned to embrace her natural self at 43, rather than go the route of aesthetic enhancement. "When I think about beauty standards these days — the ones my mother followed, the ones I have — what I mostly consider is all the space the not feeling good took up," Glynnis decides. As the mother of two daughters, I can only hope that my girls are filled up with that good feeling, rather than endless, soul-sucking critique.

Also this week: Moderna's vaccine has shown promising results in kids ages 12-17. As Emily Anthes notes: "The Moderna results are not a surprise and match what Pfizer reported in its trial of young adolescents. But they add to a growing body of evidence that the vaccines are safe and effective in children." Pam Belluck reports on a small study of children with Covid inflammatory syndrome, or MIS-C. These children appeared to recover from their most serious symptoms, but still had muscle weakness and emotional difficulties six months after their illness.

Mara Altman explores why the art world may make it difficult for mothers to thrive. And finally, the world says goodbye to Eric Carle, the genius behind "The Very Hungry Caterpillar." He was the author and illustrator of more than 70 books for children.

ADVERTISEMENT

When asked why he thought "The Very Hungry Caterpillar" had such lasting popularity, he responded that the book gave children hope for the future:

"Children need hope," he said. "You — little insignificant caterpillar — can grow up into a beautiful butterfly and fly into the world with your talent."

Thanks for reading.

— Jessica Grose, columnist, NYT Parenting

P.S. The Daily team followed one Texas high school's reopening during the pandemic in a four-part audio series. Join Michael Barbaro as he catches up with the people behind "Odessa," and marks the end of a school year like no other. Times subscribers can R.S.V.P. for this free event on June 10 at 6 p.m. E.T.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tiny Victories

Parenting can be a grind. Let's celebrate the tiny victories.

We play a game called "Night Night, Mama," where I lay on the floor and my 2-year-old pats my back. — Tara Kotagal, Chicago

If you want a chance to get your Tiny Victory published, find us on Instagram @NYTparenting and use the hashtag #tinyvictories; email us; or enter your Tiny Victory at the bottom of this page. Include your full name and location. Tiny Victories may be edited for clarity and style. Your name, location and comments may be published, but your contact information will not. By submitting to us, you agree that you have read, understand and accept the Reader Submission Terms in relation to all of the content and other information you send to us.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for NYT Parenting from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018