| | Illustration by Tomi Um | | | I was recently given a diagnosis of prostate cancer by my urologist. During the consultation, I was told I have a Gleason score of 8, indicating an aggressive form of the cancer. I had been going to this doctor for years and felt I had a good rapport with him. On the day of the diagnosis, I asked him for advice on which of the two courses of action he offered — surgery or radiation — I should take. His response was, "You have to do your research and decide yourself." I tried to reassure him by saying, "I realize no option is 100 percent guaranteed, and you must have had at least dozens of other patients during your career with a similar condition," but got the same result with the add-on "Be glad it's not brain or pancreatic cancer — they are always fatal." | | I have had the feeling since that he let me down; I had no knowledge about anything regarding prostate cancer, and from that day until my treatment my anxiety and stress were highly elevated. | | My treatment for the cancer has so far been successful. But am I wrong to feel let down in my hour of need, or is this a common strategy to prevent a future lawsuit in this litigious society? Name withheld | | Read the Ethicist's reply here. | | |
沒有留言:
張貼留言