2019年6月4日 星期二

Has Trump finally jumped the shark?

A tariff too far.
View in Browser | Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book.
An aerial view of cargo trucks lining up to cross to the United States near the US-Mexico border.

An aerial view of cargo trucks lining up to cross to the United States near the US-Mexico border. Guillermo Arias/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Paul Krugman

Paul Krugman

Opinion Columnist
Life isn't fair, and politics is even less fair than the rest of life. Donald Trump has done and is doing many terrible things — inviting foreign influence into U.S. elections, ripping children from their parents and putting them in cages, poisoning the environment, praising murderous dictators and more. In terms of sheer awfulness, his protectionist trade policies are way down the list — and I say that despite being someone whose career was based largely on the study of international trade, and has every incentive to inflate the issue's importance.
Yet Trump's tariff obsession seems to be causing him more political trouble than anything else he's doing. It might even be enough to provoke a break with his otherwise slavish followers in Congress. Trump's famous boast that he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and his supporters wouldn't care may or may not be true of Republican voters, but it's clearly true of G.O.P. members of Congress. Yet there seems to be a real possibility of legislative action to block the new tariffs he threatened to impose on Mexico last week.
So why is this particular vileness the point at which his party's invertebrates show signs of developing rudimentary spines? There are two key points.
First, Trump's confrontational trade policy — unlike his racism, his determination to weaken workers' rights, his efforts to degrade the environment, and so on — doesn't have any important constituency behind it. Neither big-money donors nor guys with Tiki torches chanting "Jews will not replace us" are clamoring for tariffs. The tariff thing is basically Trump's personal obsession.
Second, there are important constituencies — important parts of the Trump coalition — that really, really don't like the prospect of trade war. Farmers have already been hurt badly by the confrontation with China, which has sent prices for crops like soybeans plunging. U.S. industry, which has invested huge sums in a supply chain that sprawls across both our northern and southern borders, is horrified at the thought of a confrontation that disrupts trade with Mexico.
Until recently, business and investors were, in effect, betting that with so much money at stake, even Trump would rein in his impulses, that on trade he would talk loudly but carry a small stick. That's pretty much what seemed to have happened on Nafta, the North American Free Trade Agreement: after denouncing Nafta as the worst trade deal ever made, Trump negotiated a new deal so similar to the existing one that you need a magnifying glass to see the differences.
But now he's effectively reneging on his own deal, threatening tariffs unless Mexico does something, he knows not what, to prevent asylum-seekers from seeking asylum.
Will he really do it? The various newsletters I receive can't seem to believe it. Citibank, for example, writes that "the consequences of this policy could be so extreme we see it as unlikely to happen."
But Trump has a thing about tariffs, and he really hates looking like a loser. So yes, this may really be about to happen. And even the G.O.P. may finally reach a breaking point
Quick Hits
There's a looming confrontation between Italy and the European Union over budget deficits. This is a very big deal. It could potentially even blow up the euro.
People we are told are leading conservative intellectuals seem remarkably friendly with racist authoritarians. Funny how that happens.
Tax cuts don't pay for themselves, Part MMXIX. But claiming that they do gets you a presidential medal of freedom.
The "output gap" — the difference between what the economy is producing and what it could produce — sounds like a technical thing. But it's hugely important for policy, and Europe is doing it wrong.

FEEDBACK

If you're enjoying what you're reading, please consider recommending it to friends. They can sign up here. If you want to share your thoughts on an item in this week's newsletter or on the newsletter in general, please email me at krugman-newsletter@nytimes.com.

Facing the Music
<nil>
There's a lot wrong with social media. But I love the way YouTube lets you watch performances by musicians you'd never encounter otherwise. Reina del Cid does an old classic.
ADVERTISEMENT
In The Times
The Economics of Rihanna's Superstardom
By ALAN B. KRUEGER

The late, great Alan Krueger on the economics of … Rihanna.

Two Centuries of Taylor Swift
By PAUL KRUGMAN

I've also done some calculations myself –– and found surprising long-term continuity in the incomes of music superstars.

Senator Elizabeth Warren speaking at a campaign stop in Salem, Iowa, on Sunday. After five months as a presidential candidate, she is showing signs of success at distinguishing herself in a packed field.
Elizabeth Warren Gains Ground in 2020 Field, One Plan at a Time
By THOMAS KAPLAN AND ASTEAD W. HERNDON

Elizabeth Warren's bizarre strategy: Talk actual substance.

Trump's War on Worker Rights
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD

Why do people still call Trump a "populist?"

ADVERTISEMENT

NEED HELP?

Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

|
Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps. Subscribe »
Copyright 2019 The New York Times Company
620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

沒有留言:

張貼留言